Is the death penalty appropriate for rape?

Is the death penalty appropriate for rape?

Nah, I'ld say around 6 months to a year is about right.
Which is coincidentally what the limits are on it here.
Which is coincidentally what that swimmer who "got away with it" received.

depends, according to sjws we're all convicted rapist that are running free

Child rape, yes. Public hanging

Not even close. Rape is hardly the most serious thing women need to be a afraid of.

Child rape under 10 but an adult woman nah

Realistically, punishment for rape should be about on the same level as a moderately serious level of battery. A violent crime posing threats both real and imagined of both body and psyche, but it's certainly not a matter of one life weighed against the other.

>Asange potentially getting death sentence
>getting death sentence for a thing that people are emotionally unstable about
>getting a death sentence for a thing a substantial amount of people is regarded as an issue where the victim is always to trust 100%
>opening the flood gates for psychopaths going on witch hunts, with potential fatal outcome

You can do it for child molesters though.

I would say yes, but with all these false rape accusations it wouldn't really work and would turn into a genocide instead.

rape, yes
"rape", no

I'd be fine with it, as long as the penalty for falsely accusing some one of rape carries the same sentence.

i'm against the death penalty because the government can't be trusted, but lethal force is absolutely justified
women need to stop being such cucks and start to carry regularly, and shoot men that try to rape them

rape is just battery with sex
it really shouldn't be considered more of a crime than battery

considering that a women can look at you and acuse you of rape for nothing, i guess not

Death penalty isn't appropriate for any crime. It's a barbaric relict from darker times and I'm glad the majority of civilized nations abolished it.

I'd like to see some of the faggots in this thread get raped.

Battery can't make a baby. Stay in school.

I've always felt that anal rape should be much more harshly punished than another kind of rape. Is this just because I can relate to the fear of it but I cannot relate to the fear of vaginal rape? Or is it credible to suggest that having your vagina violated is likely to be less physically traumatic than your anus?

Not to mention how their time in prison goes.
Sex offenders apparently have the worst stretches.

Nope. There's still the chance they didn't actually do it. Same for murder.
Prison cell to decay. That's what they're for, not small fry criminals.

Yes, mostly because muslims would die out.

Honestly a small fine, maybe $300. "Rape" is literally just touching someone.

Of course if you violently assault someone along with rape, you should go to jail for a long time.

But just touching someone? Get over it.

There should be a death pentalty for child rape.

>The rape that can affect a man should be more harshly punished
Be more obvious.

>Or is it credible to suggest that having your vagina violated is likely to be less physically traumatic than your anus?
Virgin detected

I'd imagine them being the same, if I was a girl and was about to be raped I'd want my ass to be ravaged, less risk overall

Why are liberals so unreasonable?

Rape is forced penetrative sex. You are talking about sexual assault

Rape is literally worse than murder.

I was being serious. I'm not a virgin, but I don't think it's given me a great deal of insight into whether vaginal rape would be less or equally traumatic than anal rape. I just know that a girl I was sleeping with once told me that she felt very sorry for prostitutes, because she imagined that pornography had made 'anal' a more commonplace request.

Kek this

Vaginas naturally lubricate themselves. Anuses don't

>braindead retards actually believe this

Check'd

nice trips

Why?

>okay but
this tumblr generation needs to shoot itself in the mouth

depends if you think a woman's worth is her virginity then yes otherwise it's just uncomfortable sex so no
but for real though if someone tries to rape you there is no doubt it should be legal to kill that motherfucker

I could consider castration in cases without any uncertainty or mitigating circumstances.

>kebab comes to europe for white wimmin
>brutally rapes some poor innocent passerby
>gets castrated and paraded in front of his fellow barbarians

Seeing that their live is pretty much over anyway even after jail time, you might as well cut the middleman and put them out of their misery.

this

rape is a pretty barbaric crime so yeah i would say so, so long as liars who claim to have been raped get the same treatment.

>le edgelords of Sup Forums

We are a developed society that rehabilitates out criminals. If we start calling for shit like this we might as well go full sharia & cut the hands off a thief

No.

The death penalty is both cruel (the determination of who gets the death penalty is, "As arbitrary as being struck by lightening,") and unusual (only five 1st world countries use the death penalty)

I think the liars of rape should deserve even worst than the rapists.

There was a case in Thailand where some fucknut raped and literally thrown a 14 year old off a train. The impact broke her neck.

Most people wanted him lynched on the spot.

>knowing the current laws and respecting court rulings based upon them is edgy
fuck this gay earth

This.

If rape is worse than death then being falsely accused of rape is worse than rape.

Emma Phipps has rape and murder coming her way (karma) for wishing death upon an innocent man.

So how about after a guy knocks one of your teeth out he tops it off by fucking you up the ass. Same difference?

No. Women are pathological about rape. Keep in mind more than 50% of women fantasize about rape. The thought of it happening to them provokes strong sexual arousal in them and they project this lust onto males with their pathological obsession. With a lot of mentally unstable women this sexual obsession leads to false rape accusations because they want to believe it really happened.

You really can't trust women at all when it comes to rape due to their own mental pathologies.

Would you also apply same kind of punishment for women? e.g forced hysterectomy.

>some drunk dude fingerbangs some drunk chick
>CRUCIFY HIM, RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPE

>hundreds of Muslim immigrants gang up to sexually assault hundreds of women on NYE in Cologne
>MORE MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS, MORE MORE MORE

>b-but that deters actual rape victims because no one will believe them :(((

Absolutely, imagine how many niggers as mudslimes we'd get to execute. It would be like ethnic cleansing.

No.

But what the sentences should be really depends.

If you just fingerbang, 6 months to a year is reasonable but if you brutally rape someone with full penetration and beating, you should probably get at least a decade.

the only appropriate response here is, "If you're not lying then you have nothing to fear."

No, just under punish them and watch society execute them minus the tax payer expense.

>be rapist 1
>get 3 months
>realeased, everyone remember who i am
>get either publicly lynched or my like gets made into such shit that i take my own life
>tax payer cost: only 3 months of housing a prisoner!

>be rapist 2
>get sentenced to 15 years
>get realeased
>am a "literally who" now
>only people who want to lynch me are victim/close to the victim
>most of society looks down on me, but "ive done my time"
>cant get employed
>collect gibs
>die as a disgusting old pervent 60 years after the crime
>cost to tax payer: a life time

Seriously, underpunishing sick fucks and murderers gives a win for everyone.

The usual time served for manslaughter is 10 to 16 months. So you're literally saying rape is worse than murder.

Because false accusations aren't a thing, I'm sure.

What did he get charged for anyways?

All news outlets say secular assault but it clearly wasn't the charge by his time.

You're literally using two different terms at two points in that sentence when they have entirely different meanings. Murder is premeditated, the intent to kill. Manslaughter at worst is still killing someone when you didn't mean to.

>Keep in mind more than 50% of women fantasize about rape.
It's just that. A fantasy. Nobody wants that to actually happen.

>"rape"

He just fingered a chick who lied about being raped so her boyfriend wouldnt find out

rape is less bad than infidelity or nagging

so yeah, if the death penalty is introduced for the aforementioned two then I guess it is okay

Shit man dont say that. It would be like those spiders that kill their lovers after sex

Not the death penalty, but rape should be punished harshly depending on the circumstances. If some guy grabs a girl off the sidewalk and rapes her in an alley with a knife to her throat, that should land him 5-10 years. If a guy finger bangs a passed out drunk girl behind a dumpster, I'd say 6 months is plenty.

time served is about rehabilitation. it has nothing to do with relativistic morality, or ethics, or anything like that.

what YOU are saying is that the government's decisions -- outcomes of thousands of cases where sentencing is decided by thousands of judges -- are a substitute for judging right and wrong by the teachings of christ. that we know X is more wrong than Y because of the sentencing. literally degeneracy and/or autism.

>Stretches

Oh I can think About a few things that will stretch for them

I agree that he shouldn't have mixed up the terms but are you seriously implying rape is worse than manslaughter?

Oh MY FUCKING BAD. Here, while you're stuck in semantics, let me fucking clarify you goddamn autistic piece of shit...

YOU'RE LITERALLY SAYING RAPE IS WORSE THAN KILLING SOMEONE.

There, are you fucking happy now cocksucker? Does this post meet the high standards you demand on fucking Sup Forums you dumb liberal bitch?

>How good

About as good as the refugees who swim to Europe.

The victim literally told the court during sentencing that she did not wish for him to serve a long sentence. She pleaded for leniency. And now all of the sudden the judge is a rape apologist scumbag for heeding her recommendation

we live in a strange world

>digging a deeper hole
repent now.

> You don't need privacy because you have nothing to fear!

>manslaughter
>murder
Liberal education folks!

But if you brutally rape someone, you are committing more than one crime.

>someone mentions christ on Sup Forums

>not turning your enemies tactics back on them

Yea brock will commit suicide anytime now

Yes, deliberately raping someone is worth more time in jail than accidentally hitting someone with your car.

No. It would just lead to a spike in false rape accusations and thousands of people would die for a crime they never committed.

Have a (you).

>pic related

And you somehow think it'll add up to a decade? Go and add it up.

Nice opinion. I'm willing to be the majority disagrees. Including probably all the women who are not feminists.

I'd be more worried about my teeth

I'm not going to apply terms like worse to it but intent should be considered when applying sentencing. If you didn't mean to kill someone it's less bad than that you deliberately intended to rape someone and then did it.

>accidentally hitting someone with your car
That's not manslaughter, that would be negligent homicide. Manslaughter would be deliberately driving someone over with your car after they provoked you.

Would you like us to compare it to the terms for murder? Are you willing to bet the decade you used is still one of the worse levels?

Not by a long shot, rape itself is just sex without (explicit) consent, it doesn't even have to be physically forced or under a threat. It's something that most women enjoy thousands of times in their life, comparable with someone feeding you your favorite cake, just without consent. Though that example is probably even more harmful than the unwanted sex.
First offenders with no harm done and not in connection with assault or something should get away with a small fine or a few hours of community service at most.

Negligent homicide would be allowing someone to die. Fairly certain hitting someone with the car is involuntary manslaughter in US law.

Forced penetration in the ass is a 1000x worse then forced penetration into a vagina. Ass is tighter and dry.

>yfw fairly certain

It's funny because niggas can't swim and the don't get away with anything.

Would you like to stop sperging out for a few seconds and realize I and are different people?

>intent should be considered when applying sentencing
I agree with that.

>If you didn't mean to kill someone it's less bad than that you deliberately intended to rape someone
Can't agree with that, it depends on the situation. For example, if you beat someone up without the intent to kill them but that person still dies because of the injuries you caused, it would be worse than rape and should be punished harder.

What about black on white rape? Shouldn't that have the death penalty?

Release her in Germany, rapefugee problem solved.

>respond to the reasonably worded post (because I recognized that you were, indeed, different people) as "sperging"

Wow. You're a blind cocksucker.

>FUCK RAPISTS KILL ALL RAPISTS

Niggers are the most rape-y by a breathtaking margin

>OMG THE SYSTEM IS RACIST BLACKS ARE OPPRESSED I DONT WANT TO KILL RAPISTS ANYMORE TOO MANY BLACKS IN PRISON FUCK WHITE PEOPLE

That post was reasonably worded, this was what I was mostly referring to And I don't think you did recognize that we were different people, because you directly attributed one of his statements to me in that post.

>year 2026
>10 years after the infamous trial of a fucking white male who was given a light sentence despite being a rapist
>women who previously associated the "feminist" ideology became competitive swimmers after the trial to be able to get away with murdering rapists
>now doing a lot of sports and losing weight, those women realised that life is much easier when you're attractive and fit
>feminism has disappeared

So what? You don't believe it wasn't relevant to what you were saying? Specifically how someone else responded with what I was setting up?