Tfw when brexit is happening

>Tfw when brexit is happening
>The netherlands main money source is import/export
>Will netherlands go to shit?

Other urls found in this thread:

dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/02/85713-2/
dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/06/91621-2/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

EU needs cooperation and trade as much as individual countries. Nothing is stopping you from make the sort of trade agreements you want if you leave.
All you get for staying is Polands electricity bill, enrichment, and the slow decay of democracy and your culture as you are absorbed into the EU oligarchy.

NL already trades in and out of the EU.
If England jumped into the EEA, it would by and large be business as usual.
Same thing if they didn't.

>EU needs cooperation and trade as much as individual countries.

Well, in order to import shit into the EU market, you need to obey EU regulations. So if the Netherlands want to sign a bilateral agreement with the UK, the UK would have to agree to make their products comply with EU regulations - in which case, why do the Brexit in the first place?

>in which case, why do the Brexit in the first place?
Because then you get to make your own laws, and decide how many niggers you get annually. If it's not a problem for your products to comply with EU standards and regulations now, why would it be when you leave?

EU doesn't have a future, eastern Europe will stop playing ball as soon as Germany, Britain, and France cut off the money to pay for the Balkan expansion and the EU army(it's coming, i'm not making this up). EU will break, and in it's stead we will simply make a new schengen agreement or the like for decent countries, and use NATO as our military alliance.

>Because then you get to make your own laws, and decide how many niggers you get annually.
They made their own laws already, in which they basically gave free migration to any Indian or Paki who wishes to live in the UK.

>in which they basically gave free migration to any Indian or Paki who wishes to live in the UK.
Jesus H Christ . . . .stop talking bullshit.

But Netherlands already is shit

>in which case, why do the Brexit in the first place?
It's not just about certain goods regulations - it's about Democracy.

Leaving EU doesn't mean that all trade is going to end overnight like eurocrats want you to believe, it just means you get to negotiate your own trade deals independently.

Try to realize that for career politicians, after sitting in local governments the way up is moving to Brussels. So it's not odd for local politicians to have globalist views supported by the EU as this is the main requirement for them to move up in the political world.

And England really doesn't have that much of a disproportionate amount of immigrants, they're just a large country so they end up having large communities of sandniggers.

In any case, if you want to reverse this situation the only way to do it is to remove the EU influence.

Ah yes, because lest we forget, the FPTP elected MPs in the lower house and the unelected House of Lords passing laws is democracy par excellence, but laws passed by the equally (un)democratically elected EU parliament is not.

Just say you don't want to be part of the European project and skip the whole farce about democracy. That's fair to say, and that way you retain plausibility.

Fogh must have been pretty butthurt when EU didn't want him, i suppose he's happy with his NATO position tho.
Shame he had to make it popular to use spindoctors, we could have done without that.

It won't happen. The Global Elites will never allow it

We have a constitutional monarchy .. .the commons and the Lords are part of this process, they are fundamentally British and answerable . . . where the EU is not!.

The EU legislative council (or whatever name they call themselves) . .are NOT elected, there is nothing democratic about it.

>where the EU is not!
Bull. Shit. The EU parliament obeys to similar practices in terms of review, review through the population (elections, remember?), prosecution for illegal activities, ..

The EU legislative body differs at most logistically from most other democracies in Europe, the UK isn't that different. There are very similar rules in terms of how a bill becomes law, if you want to nitpick on those, go ahead, but that's not worth a discussion in my opinion.

The council is appointed by the leaders of Europe. The UK prime minister is not elected either - he is appointed through the house of commons / the queen.

I thought your main money source was the bulldog cafe and drug tourists from the US?

I think he's very butthurt, NATO secretary general has a lot of prestige, but he basically just signs his name on their angry letters. Where the EU would have been the continuation of his career.
And of course we need spindoctors, we're basically becoming Amerilards.

>The UK prime minister is not elected either - he is appointed through the house of commons / the queen.
Why are you talking complete shit??? . . . .was your shill-sheet badly translated?

A prime minister is chosen by the Party members . . .. not by the Commons or the Queen.

Don't try and talk complete crap about how my country works.

Everything you have said is just stupid. . .please just stop wasting my time.

What is stopping us from forming trade agreements? The Netherlands has been a trading nation pur sang before the Eu was formed. In fact, we can undercut our rivals when we are not bound by EU rules. Rotterdam is still the most important trading port in Europe. All we have to lose are the comfy EU jobs for our current politicians in the future.

Someone fell for the Eurojew fearmongering propaganda. This & .

The PM is appointed by the Queen. I see you are very much British in that you do not understand a single thing about the political system that governs the land you are living in.

Quote:
"Appointing the Prime Minister – The Queen is responsible for appointing the Prime Minister after a general election or a resignation, in a General Election The Queen will appoint the candidate who is likely to have the most support of the House of Commons. In the event of a resignation, The Queen listens to advice on who should be appointed as their successor."

Dutch set to lose 4.3% of exports after Brexit A Brexit will cost the Dutch economy €10bn over 15 years: CPB

Read more at DutchNews.nl: Dutch banks ready for Brexit, but central bank chief says ‘no acute risk’

dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/02/85713-2/
dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/06/91621-2/

The study that article is based on, is using false assumptions.

>false assumptions.
such as?

that's just ceremonial

Says who?

Brexit is unprecedented. Brexiters cannot say what will happen, they can only guess.

So assumptions are made all round, by people both pro and anti EU over what will happen if Brexit is voted for.

They are all as false as each other.

It's 'Rubber stamping' . . you idiot.

Again - I know more about the workings of My Country, than you do skimming Wikipedia trying to shill for the EU.

You are pissing me off with your stupidity.

>Will netherlands go to shit?
It's already is.

I think this thread need some American interjection in the discourse.

I have no idea what this is about. Britain is leaving the EU or something?

This.

No reason to stop trading when they leave.

>People actually think the EU is going to sever all current trading with Britain out of spite and protectionism

The EU is stuck sucking London dry with its retarded nuclear projects and whatever other useless shit it can find to invest.

Pretty much all the capital for projects in EU comes from London. The fact we are now waiting for Brexit before the merge vote means that London money is going to be even more important and I don't think the Jews even want it to happen.

Indeed. However the House of Commons bows to that ceremony. There is no direct election of the PM, and the House of Commons has the power to remove the PM at any given time, practically. Very much like the European Parliament can sucker punch any Commissioner.

>the EU has more chance of getting refugees to stop raping and than they do of stopping the dutch from trading

Assumption that people are so retarded they will end lucrative trade deals over feelings.

I think if Brexit happens, Britain will begin sending the navy into the Mediterranean in 'peace keeping' operations to protect the EU, and we'll end up paying even more towards rescuing people / turning away boats to Nigeria and whatever other African nation we still have some influence over.

Care to explain it to me then? You were referring to the EU legislative council as NOT elected, whereas I mentioned that the UK Prime Minister is not elected either. So how does one become UK Prime Minister, and when do you elect him or her?

>and the House of Commons has the power to remove the PM at any given time
Here we go. . . . . talking shit about how another country works.

The party that the PM belongs to, can have him removed (albeit messily).

The Queen could 'In theory' dissolve Parliament (and in doing so the PM) but that will never happen.

If I were you, I would stick to talking about Austria . . .. . .because you are replying to people about British Politics - when you have no clue Whatsoever.

I don't think it's about ending deals, but rather that these deals will become less lucrative.

The article says: "Euler Hermes reached its figures on the basis of free movement of capital, goods, services and people between the EU and the UK. Brexit will mean import tariffs and customs forms which will become an obstacle to trade."

Doesn't seem to mention the end of deals, but increased cost - or less profit.

The EP can only vote down the entire commission

Ironically, joined Dutch/English companies like Royal Dutch Shell and Unilever will probably benefit hugely from a Brexit.

Because then they can pick and choose which legislation to fall under.
Probably put the HQ's in London for lower regulation and set up backdoor offices in Amsterdam to penetrate the EU market.

>and decide how many niggers you get annually
>Europe is the place where shitskins get from

UK has shitskin problems, yes, but it's not EU's fault, they are importing Pakistanis and Indians via their own policy.
Britfags are delusional on immigration issue.

>Here we go. . . . . talking shit about how another country works.

So a vote of no confidence is not enough to force a PM to resign or call for new elections? Maybe something akin to 28th of March, 1979>

anglo-dutch. does it get more perfidious?

> Brexit will mean import tariffs and customs forms which will become an obstacle to trade.
Checked.
Sure, it is all guesses. But that does not imply that mutually beneficial agreements cannot be accomplished. It is not credible to assume those will not be made.

Tariffs are extremely unlikely.

Customs will add costs, sure, but it's a very minor issue and England gets improved security in return.

What bullshit are you taking about?

The European Parliament is the legislative arm of the EU and it is composed of MEPs, directly elected.

The Council is the executive. Equivalent to the Queen and the cabinet. Your prime minister decides on his cabinet, your little Inglunder people do not.

Go back to skool.

Don't worry, you've already cornered the European market on child pornography.

Britain leaves European union..

Blames inflated prices and potato famine on brown people.

Nice thinking forage.

But seriously lot of stuff comes into the country from Europe..

Is that what you were getting at user?

>Pretty much all the capital for projects in EU comes from London
Utter bullshit.

And if a bank handles the financing, it doesn't mean the capital originated from London.

>Britfags are delusional on immigration issue.
This.

I spoke to your typical English drunk last night and he said he will vote Brexit because of pressure on school places, doctors etc.

I explained to him that EU migrants make a net financial contribution and he should blame his own government for not using this money and expanding capacity and infrastructure.

CHAIN REACTION

You don't know much about economics do you? In case of Brexit there will be a time of insecurity, some analysts expect several years. Investors don't like that so you can expect massive capital escape if you vote leave.

>But that does not imply that mutually beneficial agreements cannot be accomplished. It is not credible to assume those will not be made.

It is not credible to assume that they WILL be made.

UK is one single country in the entire world.

Do you not expect ANY punitive action from the EU?

Do you really think you quit a club and free yourself of it's obligations but gain back all the advantages? Honestly?

Tesco may have to pay tax!! Then everybody going to be counting pineapples!

England could be the new Mexico!

...build your own fkin wall trump!!!!

1688 never forget

The eternal anglo will be defeated, the financial services will move from London to Frankfurt.

No your "country" is shit, give back Flanders crossaint.