Freedom of Art

Does art should have boundaries?

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/vaginal-knitting_n_4386419.html?section=australia
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3598641/Australian-artist-Sophia-Hewson-films-rape-representation-New-York.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no people do

Isn't this cp?

Depends. I mean most art is pretty degenerate nowadays due to the western civilizations decadence but it can also be blamed on youth who have no idea what art means

...

Mods as art .. :(

Yes. It was pretty controversial when it came out, this girl is ten years old.

Yes

She's like 50 or something now. Don't be stupid, Hans.

I thought cp is depicting kids in sexual manner, i.e. : fucking.

So, technically, this is not cp. Just like nudist pictures.

It was found to be literal cp and the guy who did it, their producer, was found to be a pedo.
Which was a shock, because show business Jews are never into attacking children ...

They're just shitposting more than I am.

You're right. It's actually not CP.

kek

this was straight up marketing genius

No
No, non-sexual nudes are not CP.

Only pedophiles would find this sexual.

I assume it's like the chick in American Beauty. You can take nude photos of underage if the parents are ok with it and all

Good album.

That's an amazing album.

The guitar solo on "Catch Your Train" is the greatest of all time.

I love Uli Roth era Scorpions.

...

I agree it may not be cp in the same way Renaissance art is not cp.

But let's be honest. Why would you want pics of naked kids in first place?
Art is a blanket term invented by Jews to justify borderline degeneracy.

Maybe this is not statutory cp.
But 100% she is being objectified and sexualized despite young age.

Her pose is sexy.
And you dudes might reply:
>user, it is your malicious mind that makes her pose look sexy
But that's wrong at many levels.
I.might be biased, but my biases are channelled by cultural hard wiring.
So in 2016, for me, OP's pic is clearly sexual at many level... but that's just because it mimics the way sexuality is depicted in our society.
The "artist" knew it would be controversial and chose to deceive us with this cognitive ploy that exploits cultural stereotypes.

Now shut me down, artsy kikes. Because I know your tricks. Your kike tricks cannot fool me like a generic stormtroopers.

If a woman can knit a scarf soaked in wool from her menses, out of her vagina or invite a man to her house, have [apparently consensual] sex, then say she was raped and call it "art" - why not have no boundaries?

huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/vaginal-knitting_n_4386419.html?section=australia
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3598641/Australian-artist-Sophia-Hewson-films-rape-representation-New-York.html