Hello. Day 4 reminder:
>the quantitative argument: "Fed is the goat because most GS won"
who are Court, Graf, Wills, Evert and Navratilova. or in recent times, if you will, Serena Williams. you are a Fedfaggot
>"b-but Serena is a gorrila"
that's objectively sexist. stats are stats. you are a Fedfaggot
>the quantitative male argument: "ok, so Fed is the goat because most GS won among men"
if your argument was quantitative, then reducing it gender-wise defeats the argument. you are a Fedfaggot.
>the qualitative argument: "Fed is the goat because most GS won, all well earned, highlighting his dominance"
a great number of Fed's GS titles came during a period of great wishwashiness in men's tennis, to which Fed himself added to an over climate of mental intimidation. so basically Fed "earned" GS titles against opponents such as washed-up Hewitt and Agassi, mentally-caved Roddick, nobody-tier Philippoussis, Baghdatis, Gonzalez and Soderling. that counts for 10 out of his 18. by contrast, Nadal faced only 4 stinkeroo finalists (Puerta, Soderling, Berdych, Ferrer) for his 15 GSand Djokovic only one (Tsonga) for 12. two-thirds of Fed's GS titles are objectively shit. you are a Fedfaggot.
>the dominant argument: "ok, but still, being dominant is being dominant"
Fed is 3-6 against Nadal and 1-3 against Djokovic in finals. his only dominance in his career was schooling Andy Mury and countless others second-tiers. you are a Fedfaggot.
>"ok, but Fed won more titles on different surfaces"
so did Sampras. nobody talks about him anymore. you are a Fedfaggot.
>the simplefag argument: "sh-shut up, ok, I just wanted to see Fed win another one"
congrats for you, then. you are still a Fedfaggot
>the simplefag asking for more argument: "ok, I know I said "just one more Fed", but now I want him to take his 19th as well, cause why not"
you are a Fedfaggot.