There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on track A, there are fifty faggots tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull this lever, the trolley will switch to a track B. However, you notice that there is one person, Omar Mateen, on the B track. You have two options:
(1) Do nothing, and the trolley kills the fifty faggots on track A.
(2) Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the track B where it will kill Omar Mateen.
Which is the correct choice Sup Forums?
The Big Question
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
I pull the lever.
Hate mudslimes more.
Pull the lever. One life for fifty. The conclusion is logical.
MULTI-TRACK DRIFTING!
MULTI TRACK DRIFTING
This. Fags are cancer but Mudshits are ultimate cancer.
Don't pull the lever, then kill Omar myself.
...
The fifty faggots. Then Omar Mateen can go kill another 50 at a gay bar.
THE LITERAL TRUMP TRAIN
This, and faggots tend to not reproduce
Don't pull the lever, then walk up to Omar and stomp him to death.
>tfw outshitposted the shtposter
>implying I would stop the train altogether so they can DIE FUCKING SLOWLY OF STARVATION AND THIRST.
A quick death is too good for all of them.
Isn't this the precise argument that has been used in an attempt to prove sociopathy? The obvious choice is to kill Omar
This is the only logical answer
The obvious answer is the ability to make any choices means you lack empathy. The overwhelming majority of those taking the test couldn't fathom having the right to choose in the first place.
It's supposed to point out emotional decisions lead to unethical practices.
I don't hate fags but I hate pisslam
This is the only correct answer.
If you let either live then they'll come back to bite you in the ass once the general election comes.
How many of the fags are jews
Assume standard fags to jews proportions.
/thread
Shame but, oh well.
The only correct answer is to kill the 50 faggots, then hand over your gun to Omar and tell him Allahu Ackbar.
The only correct answer.
DING DING DING
redirect the tracks towards Sup Forumslution particulates
is it bad if I dont get the point of the original trolley problem?
why wouldnt you save the most people you can?
presuming you're invested in a positive outcome and not a muslim
...
...
It's the issue of authority. Most people rely on it to make ethical decisions, out of habit, culture, or conditioning. When removed people are too scared to make a decision they might be punished for (since the governing body tends to punish people severely for subverting its role).
...
>is it bad if I dont get the point of the original trolley problem?
>why wouldnt you save the most people you can?
Because you've fallen for the false presumption all lives are of equal value.
The one man might be the sole provider and loving father to ten children who with his help and guidance will grow up to be productive members of society who will improve it. The five men on the other track might be shiftless drains on society who damage it by remaining alive.
If you don't know the people concerned, you aren't able to make an informed judgement. The only fair thing to do is nothing and let the accident take it's course.
I laughed for the first time in months.
Haha
>Let the train kill 50 homos.
>let the mudslime go free
>he kills 50 more homos and then gets killed
>everything went better than expected
>not lining the switch halfway so that the train derails and takes out everyone
t. freight conductor
You fell for the utilitarianism meme. Don't feel bad, our culture indoctrinates you in it practically from birth. But acknowledging one's flaws is the first step on the road to correcting them.
We already did that, artistically.
t. multi-track drifting
>multi track drifting
do you have the multi track verion
kill the fags let omar go omar kills more fags win win
Here you go
thanks
The trolley problem is originally that the single individual of someone you know (relative or friend) Vs complete strangers.
Do you kill your relative/friend to save 5 strangers or do you kill 5 strangers to save the life of a single relative/friend?
Its an ethical dilemma.
Watch the train kill the fags.
Muslim will just kill some others for me and get shot.
>Orlando
Move Omar to the other track. Simple.
Pull the level while the trolley is halfway across and cause Multi-Track Drifting.
Omar
Faggots cannot reproduce
And I hate Muslims far more
Pull the lever.
Fags are obnoxious fags, but they aren't trying to kill me and my family, plus they know how to gentrify a neighborhood.
Stupid post.
You kill the mudslime.
Im sure a majority of those faggots slaughtered were productive members of society
this
Leave it. Then kill the slime myself
Well, fags are AIDS'ing themselves to death
But the Muslims are breeding like roaches.
So I solve the Muslim problem.
Do nothing, that way i can have 100 dead fags
the trolley problem looks like something ISIS would literally do
>be homophobe or islamophobe
Honestly this is a hard question for me. I'd feel morally tortured either way.
You're missing about 1.6 billion more Omar Mateens and they all need the trolley.
35pbp
Pull the lever twice so I'm responsible for the faggots deaths
I hate mudshits but Omar "slay da gays" mateen is a fucking national hero.
I kill those gay and give Omar a second chance to best this record.
lol ofc Omar would have to go
(1) Omar is religious fanatic scum
(2) Omar hates western values
brotip, more gay men means less competition for str8 guys!