So how many shooters do you think were really there?

So how many shooters do you think were really there?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=SAHvLAJ-5aQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

At least 2.

2...the same number of genders there are

It's possible there was only one, but I'm going to bank on two because muzzies like to work in pairs.

he had help from fbi or cia

Fucking bigot. Get on AfD's level:

youtube.com/watch?v=SAHvLAJ-5aQ

Was getting shot part of his plan?

at least one

...

it was very painful

All these no-funz faggots thinking you couldn't shoot 50 faggots dead in a enclosed space.

Is it even possible to hit 100 people with a G17 and an AR 15? I'm not a gun expert, but those guns are cheap and shouldn't have that much stopping power to fully go through 2-3 people per round.

Unless that guy was absolutely loaded with mags, which is unlikely in suicide missions like this, the numbers don't add up to me.

My guess is that "shooter number two" was friendly fire.

probably not

gov has to clean up after themself, don't they?

He was shooting fish in a barrel.

A monkey could excicute 50 people in a nightclub filled with over 300

I think it's not impossible that it was one guy, but I don't think it's likely that it was just one.

1. Media and cops don't really have a good reason to lie and have a huge reason not to lie if there really is a dangerous gunman still on the loose.

For some reason people have a huge problem believing one armed guy can kill a bunch of people. It's really easy given the right location and has happened many times before, often with only handguns.

At least 2 probably 3 or 4

I'm talking about rounds available vs casualties suffered, not accuracy.

Mags can hold different amounts, let's say he has some shitty 25rd mags.

One in the rifle, one taped to it ready to go.

My cheap plate carrier can hold 6 mags.

Plus a few in pocket.

Ammo is not an issue.

Every time someone gives an opinion like this, it is immediately discarded.