Sup Forums is a racist honeypot

You guys are fucking racist. Prove me wrong.

Protip. You can't

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/PpY46T8t
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974
pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

i have black friends

im black

Nothing is wrong with being racist.

not an argument, probably token blacks

makes you even more of a racist

Racism doesn't exist. Race is a social tonka truck so we cannot discriminate by race. Nigger.

Being Racist is not a negative, or a positive. Prove me wrong.
Protip: You can't.

and whats wrong with it?

Continuum fallacy

I can't, I'm racist

Yet.

2017.

I'm not white and nonwhites can't be racist.

every race is racist, except whites. and thats why whites are cucks.

t. hispanic

not an argument

being one is. ALERTA ALERTA

I'd rather be racist then a cuck

Only against Haitians and Muslims

>Every other race looking out for number 1.
>Race with all the shit stops looking out for number 1 and starts looking out for everybody else.
>Everybody else starts taking advantage of it.
There's literally nothing wrong with being racist.

Not all Sup Forums

But I accept my racist beliefs for what they are, which is racism.

I don't deny it, I just hide it when I'm not anonymous. Just like everyone else.

I had sex with a few black and brown girls, totally not racist

>Prove me wrong.

I was a freedom rider

I'm not racist because this is my first time here lol from what I know this is actually satire

Sure thing Ahmed

>cucked by Japan for decades or even centuries
>basically the Poland of Asia

Muslim is not a race so hating muslims is not only wise but non-racist

Silly Hans, take off your white hood. There is no such thing as race, all the famous pop scientists say so. "Racism" is a paranoid conspiracy theory.

You can't prove a negative.

>Prove you're not a cuck.

>Protip: you can't

definition of Sup Forums

>Using 19th century science

>IQ does not measure intelligence
>an intelligence test does not measure intelligence
What does then? How hard you can suck niggerdicks?

>You guys are fucking racist
You're saying this as if it's an insult? Since when being a realist is an insult?

Implying it is wrong to be racist

IQ test results are extremely influenced by ones education.

Why is racism a bad thing

what does prove intelligence then?

I saw a German guy fasting for Ramadan and didn't offer him a bite of my BLT.

IQ

Because there are no differences between us!
We all da same!
One true human race senpai!!!!!!

Ones ability to solve logical problems

Race doesn't exist :^)

fedora quotient

Thank you for the complement, nigger! ;)

racism isnt bad, saged and reported.

Besides the sage, I'll leave this here.

You filthy Racist Goy

More and more people aren't responding to the word "racist" with negative connotations anymore.

Racism is a "natural law", and the use of the word only goes to highlight the lack of education on the matter.

you, sir, just changed my perspective

...

Everyone is racist, ESPECIALLY the Left.

Prove me wrong.

btw guise, the same exact thread in around 8 hours will be full of burgers and leafs saying HURR DURR IM NOT RACIS, i hate them so much, i swear to god

No they're not.

Spurdo thread?

Have to agree here. Haitians are the fucking worst.

>IQ test results are extremely influenced by ones education.

Educated people are smarter than uneducated people.

Someone call the news! We've had a breakthrough!

IQ tests measure one's ability to solve logical problems.

...

This no other posts needed

How to get all of Sup Forumss statistics on race, by making a bait instead of asking for it

>easy rekt
>good goy

Is it surprising to you that IQ only measures measurable intelligence?

Is an IQ test bad because it fails to measure the intelligence of someone with no arms, voice, eyes or any other way to answer the questions?

Why would tests like Raven's Matrices require any education aside from basic verbal/language skills?

How is it that young children are able to score so high on these tests? And why does getting such high scores reflect on their grades?

Smart =/= intelligent, dumbfuck

How can you be so daft mate?

merely pretending

Explain what's wrong with being racist.

I'm not racist I just prefer white people.

>I was only pretending to be retarded

/thread
/OP's life

i am a racist.

What now?

nothing is wrong with being racist you faggot,
i hate your kin who thinks there is.

You 'guys'? Really?
When people look at me they see a straight white male, but inside I am a demi-queer trans normative polygendered femme-presenting multiple androgyne black african albino lesbian and CONSTANTLY get misgendered and face racism EVERY day, which is incredibly hurtful and triggering.
I bet you're not even a progressive tanned german you hateful shitlord.

It's only a problem if you're white, like me, goy. Heheh

19th century science that's correct.

3
4 vertical lines in the left half of hexagon

while education has some causal impact on intelligence, it is a bi-directional force. intelligence can independently predict educational outcomes in terms of longevity, academic achievement and academic performance. both adult intelligence and childhood intelligence can predict educational attainment, suggesting that intelligence has significant causal impact. recent estimates for heritability of intelligence are as high as 80% in mature adults. the genotype has also been found to regulate environmental contributions to intelligence.

...

...why would they want to prove you wrong?

yeah man race doesn't exist

they're called abstract matrices right?

>current year intensifies

they are raven's progressive matrices

evolution was proved in the 19th century, does that mean evolution is outdated?

post one

is there one that hasn't been solved yet?

all I know is these tests were conceived by Hans Eysenck

reality is racist. "Proving" me wrong makes you look delusional.

>is there one that hasn't been solved yet?
they're abstract problems used to measure cognitive ability, so by their nature none of them can be unsolved. the answer must be known in order to quantify the results.

have a crack at this one though.

I am racist. What now?

underated

>as opposed to using no science at all

I really enjoyed taking the Ravens Prog Matrices test,scored a 132 though,so it could just be another shitty internet IQ test

if you think that the Intelligence Quotient doesn't measure intelligence you're obviously retarded so there's no point

OP BTFO

...

Honestly don't understand why you're heavily invested in Sup Forums's opinion on race.

>call japan honorary white while italy and spain aren't
>claim all the historical achievements of the med. while calling modern meds non-white
>anytime Asian or Ashkenazi superiority and intelligence are brought up they throw hissy fits and claim it's nepotism and cheating
>despise 65-75% of the white race and call for their extermination (slavics + white women/libruls)
It's just a bunch of germano-anglo American/British kids pretending to be tough on the internet

>a progressive matrix of progressive matrices
feels like a cheese grater on the eyes

That is very racist of you germoney, reported to mama merkel

Just curious,what is the best standardised test for I.Q.?
I've always wondered just where I stand on the scale.

Why do you guys actually hate Indians though?

How is not pooing in loo affecting any western countries?

pastebin.com/PpY46T8t

www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974

pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

prog matrices are pretty legit as they're still used in research this date, but unless the test is clinically administered then take it with a grain of salt.

still, even if you did it over the internet it's probably a decent indication of your IQ.

it's probably the most annoying one of the bunch

Can't be racist if theres no such as race

It's not when when every credible scientist today don't bother using it.

>Shopped image

The difference is that Darwin's work is significant today and was mostly right in that his theory is still used today. Phrenology doesn't hold up