What was Jackson thinking?

What was Jackson thinking?

Other urls found in this thread:

moviepilot.com/posts/2581844
youtube.com/watch?v=BEG-ly9tQGk&ab_channel=larsandersen23
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That there was more than 1 female elf in midlleearth

He wasn't. He had no time to think. A suit probably came one day and told him to put some elf chicks because market reasons. Being in a state of sleep deprivation, he agreed.

moviepilot.com/posts/2581844

>For the record, when I took this job, in 2011, I made one stipulation. That's it. I just said… I swear to God, I said, 'I will not do this film if you will not guarantee me one thing. You have to guarantee me there will be no love triangle'.

>And there wasn't. For the whole time I shot. For a year of shooting there was no love triangle… And then, I came back for re-shoots in 2012 and they were like, 'Well, we made a couple of alterations to some scenes and we added a couple more scenes'.

>And all of a sudden manifested a love triangle before my very eyes and the film was shot, and I'm in and there's no getting out and there was no escaping it.


she got cucked by hollywood. typecast FOREVER

Fuck off man, Tauriel is probably the best thing about the Hobbit trilogy.

>muh dick

blame Del Toro not Jackson. the script and characters are all Del Tacos doing.

do elves poop?

about my dick apparently

in my mouth

Not enough 2d porn of her and the dwarves

Oh look, It's another I hate women thread because i'm an autistic virgin thread.

fuck her she got dwarfed shits digusting race mixing propaganda

No shit. He should've hired someone to teach her how to properly draw a bow.

> in a state of sleep deprivation, he agreed

What did this poster mean be this

>hates sexism
>makes fun of mental disability

problematic

There's simply no reason to go adding OC characters to The Hobbit, a book that had an enormous cast of characters (made even more ridiculous in the movie with the addition of Appendices and other fanfiction, which alone added half a dozen superfluous characters).

The only argument that could be made is "well, there are no strong women (actually no women at all IIRC) in The Hobbit so we need to add a woman, because no movie trilogy could possibly be complete without a strong women character." It's just Hollywood ticking a diversity quota box, which is the SHITTIEST JUSTIFICATION EVER for tampering with a dead man's creative work. This is aside from the fact she was put in there explicitly for this retarded "love triangle" subplot which also drains precious minutes from a movie already overloaded with material.

The film isn't the book.

>Hollywood ticking a diversity quota box
why does it anger you so much that they added a female character? would you be just as angry if they added another male character?

>what_if_zelda_was_a_girl.jpg

Not him, but:

Could it be that it's changing the source material? Or that it's done for the sole reason of affirmative action?

I mean, no one cares about Ripley or Sarah Connor

#stopvirginshaming

Yes, I'm annoyed with all the deviations from the book. What's ironic is, I have never watched The Hobbit movies in their entirety. I sidestepped all the bullshit and watched a fan edit and removed everything superfluous. No Legolas floating bricks, no Elves on the barrel-ride; I must have skipped half the movie this was. That's how annoying I find it all: I am not prepared to give it a chance of registering in my brain.

I only did this because of the sheer amount of OC. If Hackson had done one or two movies without all the bullshit, I would have just watched them like a normal human being. But the mendacious nature of the trilogy means I cannot give it ground. I have learned PLENTY about it here from the threads alone, and I know I didn't miss anything special.

there are so many thing wrong in her stance that i cant even

>one day they'll all understand the superiority of the combination of 48 FPS and 3D
>at least James Cameron sees my vision

>redheaded elf
>literally fetish fuel
>they cast a fucking flat uggo

The biggest is the arrow position on the inside of the bow

You always have it on the outside when firing off your hand, with the bow canted a little towards the inside

>quiver position dangerously close to the string
>dat twisting spine
>no anchoring whatsoever
>how is she even aiming?
>the arrow seems to be knocked the wrong way round (the feather would cut her)

Alfrid was shit.

Legolas was an established character and he was equally annoying as a character.

Tauriel has the added offenses of being added purely in a shitty diversity ploy, as well as a pisspoor love triangle.

I'm sure you all know bows better than a 500 year old elf.

youtube.com/watch?v=BEG-ly9tQGk&ab_channel=larsandersen23

He was thinking she was going to be played by Saoirse Ronan.

don't know about elves but Evangeline Lilly doesn't know shit for sure.

>we want the Hunger Games audience

in the woods
wearing a tall pope hat

>Tauriel not being the most important part of the trilogy

fuck off

>they cast a fucking flat uggo
this