This is how Finnish genes compare to other European populations, we're neither Western nor Eastern Europeans

This is how Finnish genes compare to other European populations, we're neither Western nor Eastern Europeans.

Other urls found in this thread:

gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/similitude.htm
gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/ancient.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>tfw galician

How does this work.

So we're danes and poles?

O kurwa i'm a danskjävlar

We're our very own kind of people

It's not accurate. The Saami score is too high.
Where did you get this? I guess it could be the DNA results of a Laplander or something but not a proper Finn.

>Finland is red, others are yellow/green

What did they mean by this? What is this map supposed to represent?

so you're slavic

It's based on Eurogenes K36 calculator on Gedmatch.
gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/similitude.htm

Mun omat tulokset, oon melkolailla 100% suomalainen, mutten pohjoissuomalainen.

what's that, genetic similarity? even the one to Estonians is really low, Finns are a really drifted population

>Eurogenes K36 calculator on Gedmatch
Oh cool i can actually use that lol

My genetic similarity to other populations

Post your map here

>most similar to your fellow countrymen and its neighbors

WOW

>Finish students on Erasmus here
>They all look Northern European

Do you have complexes like the Southern Iberians or what.

No mistä oot?

Vähän epäilyttävää kyllä että Lapin numerot on niin korkeita.

I think it's pretty high considering that Estonians are much more mixed with other Europeans, Baltic Germans and Slavs, and even more ancient populations since Estonia is much more connected to continental Europe.

>Literally closer to a chinaman than to a southern french
finns are NOT white

4/8 Karjala, 2/8 E-Pohjanmaa, 1/8 Häme, 1/8 suomenruotsi.

yeah looking at your link I might be talking bullshit anyway, apparently it compares similarity of ADMIXTURE components

what's that sample in north China?

I did average Turk based on Eurogenes results and got this

Appearently we're mostly related to Iranians, Azeris, Turkmens and Tajiks

>what's that sample in north China?
no idea

post the European one too

special snowflakes

>tfw closer related to poles than swedes

Would a Western Turkish person be more European?

Finns are not Europeans

here

Western Turks have high Greek admixture, but they have a lot of Mongoloid dna.

we have official white map with this

>2 is not white

Based basques

are the three Anatolian samples in this one Turkish? why is it getting lower similarity to those than Georgians, Azeris and Turkmens?

>caring about how white you are

Modern Swedes' ancestors used to live in much more South quite recently, so that's not surprising. Swedish migration to Finland wasn't that big as you guys think, the Swedish speaking minority in Finland was formed mostly because Finns switched their language to Swedish when they wanted to pursue higher level jobs.

I am not entirely sure.
Here check it.

Apparently the Fennoscandian component fucks everything up.
Saami similarity seems to peak with about 70% Fennoscandian and 30% Siberian but even Fennoscandian without any Siberian raises Saami similarity a lot.

and this is the Eurogenes results of all Turks

I'll do other Turks too.

OH and by the way i mixed Tungusic Mongoloid dna with Siberian dna because there was no "tungusic" section in the calculator

Suomalaiset ja saamelaiset ovat samasta alkuperäispopulaatiosta, suomalaiset vaan ovat rikastuneet enemmän itä- ja länsieurooppalaisella aineksella, ja saamelaiset Siperiassa poikittain liikkuneista muista paimentolaisheimoista.

I suppose you'd have to look at the ADMIXTURE breakdowns of all those populations to see what's responsible for it

I could dig higher similarity to some Iranian and Central Asian populations to e.g. black sea Turks due to overrepresentation of certain components or something but that lower similarity to black sea Turks compared to Georgians is weird

you are not europeans
turks are more european than you

Oli miten oli, suomalaiset on läheistä sukua virolaisille ja helvetin kaukaista saamelaisille.

>Georgians
Are you sure that they're Georgian?

t. mehmet von stahlhelm

I am a Greek

wait, did you get the Turkish averages from a different calculator?

Päin vastoin, virolaiset ovat osana manner-Eurooppaa saaneet paljon enemmän suht äskettäisiä muuttovirtauksia idästä ja lännestä. Suomalaiset ja saamelaiset edustavat molemmat keskimäärin varhaiseurooppalaisempaa geenistöä.

Mun äitilinja on kyllä U5b1b1a1, eli mulla saattaa olla pieni saamelaisyhteys.

Jesus christ, you again?

Do you ever get tired of shitposting?

thats a neo greek name

100% iberian

we wuz

I got it from a site that used Gedmatch results of Turks.
I also tried to use Eurogenes results but Eurogenes reslts don't mention south central asian etc

I did Ancient Anatolian

u Basque m8

>Switzerland
>Northern Italy
>France
>Ireland

Joopa joo. Saamelaisten eurooppalainen perimä(Fennoscandia komponentti) toki liittyy suuremassa määrin suomalaisten eurooppalaiseen perimään mutta niiden siperialainen neljäsosa on aika vierasta kamaa, suomalaisilla kun on neljästä kuuteen kertaa vähemmän siperialaista perimää.

Liettualainenkin on geneettisesti läheisempi sukulainen kuin saamelainen.

Se neljäsosa on sitä Siperialaisia rikastusta, minkä mainisin. 3/4 taas suomalaisten kanssa yhteistä, siksi sainkin tuon ~70%.

Romans and shiiet

Okay i found some other source too
i'll try it

>southern germans are more WE WAZ than peninsular spaniards

SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIT

Erottava siperialainen tekijä tosin merkitsee tässä paljon enemmän koska geneettiset erot Euroopan sisällä ovat kymmeniä kertoja pienempiä kuin Euroopan ja muiden mantereiden välillä.

you found specifically "Eurogenes K36" results there, though?

I'm asking because in the pic you posted Turks score 37.51 of "Northwest Asian" while the other calculator uses "West Caucasian", "North Caucasian" and things like that and the components seem to be different/fewer (unless only the relevant ones are listed or something)

the components in the component similarity calculator also add up to only 93% which would make sense if you used those of a different calculator

I misunderstood you a bit

Suomalaisten ero siperialaisiin populaatioihin ei näytä olevan sen suurempi kuin eurooppalaisiin. Meilläkin on vahva muinainen Siperia-yhteys.

of course I want to make sure I'm not wh*te

Greek bro are you here?

yeah

Okay based on Eurogenes K36 results, Turks are closely related to Turkmens, Greeks, Iranians and Azeris

Azeris are the Turks' closest genetical brothers.

cypriots masterrace

aha! well now that makes sense. getting much lower to Georgians than Black Sea Turks

Ei vaan paljon heikompi. Tämä laskuri ei kerro kuinka läheistä sukua Fennoskandia komponentti on esim. kreikkalaisille vain että kreikkalaisilla ei sitä ole eikä ole muuten ole Baskia tai North Atlanticiä.
Mutta kaikki eurooppalaiset komponentit ovat globaalilla mittakaavalla läheisempää sukua toisilleen.


Perussuomalainen, oli sitten pohjanmaalta tai imatralta on noin 5-7% siperialainen. Turun seudulla hiukan alle sen ja jossain korvessa ehkä kymmenkunta.

though that's a discrepancy due to the use of different calculators. if the Turkish user finds Eurogenes K36 results for the ancient Anatolians so we can compare same-for-same, Sardinians will be at the top or close while Cypriots will drop a lot

This, by the way, can vary from Turk to Turk,
I highly doubt the genetic results of some Turks, we have millions of Nusayris, Kurds and Lazes here. They could also be tested.
to detect a non Turk, Mongoloid DNA is necessary, as can be seen here , some Istanbul "Turks" have no mongoloid dna or very low mongoloid dna whereas rural Turks from Aydın, a small city in Western Turkey, has 15% to 25% mongoloid dna.

They could also be tested as Turks*

Turks seem to be closest to populations that have either "Caucasian" or "Central Asian" components or both

there's especially variability in the Turkic-related components even within Turks due to the recent addition of it. I assume some would be somewhat closer to Greeks and Georgians and others would be somewhat closer to Central Asians, Azeris etc

>Turks seem to be closest to populations that have either "Caucasian" or "Central Asian" components or both

Yeah Turks often get Nogai+Jew or Turkmen+Greek or Turkmen+Greek in Eurogenes calculators like pic related

That's not very surprising because Turks are actually Turkmens that migrated from Turkmenistan to Anatolia. And people in Anatolia who couldn't escape to Byzantine Empire didn't magically vanish into thin air.

By the way i found this
gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/ancient.htm

This compares a nation's genetic data to ancient populations/people. They even have gladiators.

>Turkish + La_Brana

heh

100% Fennoscandian has 23 for Andronovo which is higher than for any other non-HGs

WE WUZ ARYANS
WE WUZ ORJA

Can somebody tell me how does this work and how can I use it to see my results?

upload your data to GEDmatch, find Eurogenes K36 on there and run it, copy-paste the results onto the link that has been posted above

this
t. OP

>upload your data to GEDmatch, find Eurogenes K36
That's the issue, how do I get that data?

23andme tai vastaava, maksaapi +100€

Okay i did ancient anatolia for Turks

It seems Turks in Central Anatolia are more related to ancient Iranians than ancient Anatolians

have your DNA tested with 23andme or something

Juuh en aio antaa 100 euroa ja geenejäni jutkuille. Tiputettu

:(

so they're pretty Kurdish then?

Not really since Iranians lived everywhere from Central Asia to Xinjiang to Ukraine.
it's actually pretty surprising how i fucking fell for the hittite meme, fucking k*rds

I wouldn't take it too literally since ancient populations can't be described with modern genetic components as most of them were outside modern variation.

keep in mind that Bronze Age Anatolians had increased Caucasus/Neolithic Iranian-like ancestry compared to Neolithic Anatolians so at least some of that shift probably already dates back to the Hattians. and of course the Turkic migrations decreased the similarity to Neolithic Anatolians even more