Opionions on Bill Maher, Sup Forums?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

lennyletter.com/politics/a613/hillary-clinton-is-more-than-a-president/
m.youtube.com/watch?v=IYF1iy1_-vc
medium.com/@sashastone/ten-reasons-bernie-sanders-would-not-and-could-not-have-beaten-trump-b596674c1c93#.5nbzmzrww
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Who does he want to see?

Naked boys of course

He has some nice symphonies

He says so much dumb shit and is really wishy washy on his political views.

Being anti-Hillary is not being pro-Trump.

No one liked Hillary, ever

you should be wishy washy though, being a hard stance faggot is why so many liberals and conservatives are insane
i'm not saying you should change your mind everyday or something but you have to be willing to understand things and not view things as being wrong or right because someone "on your side" said something

I used to dislike his whiny faggot stance on everything.

Lately he has been btfo of the Clintons and other weak ass liberals.

I enjoy watching his show...which is strange.

His audience is the worst kind of liberal cuckolds though.

>No one
Well that just ain't so

lennyletter.com/politics/a613/hillary-clinton-is-more-than-a-president/

>She is an idea, a world-historical heroine, light itself.
I wouldn't be so sure.

>whiny faggot stance
>weak ass liberals
>liberal cuckolds

Damn, you are deep as hell down the conservative superiority hole.

That made me laugh

Fuck off, cuck.

t. Hillary

Literally 14 years old. Haha.

I see the opposite. He makes some very good points and wraps them in dumb jokes, but he is an intellectual hypocrite whenever logic goes against his politics. Like most people who talk a lot professionally, you can see the line he draws before he loses credibility.

>haha

You have to go back

>mfw shillary will die bitter, alone and depressed knowing she never got what she most desired
>she will never be remembered by history as the first female US president
>mfw it will haunt her until her last moments knowing she is ultimately a failure

Some sick image macros here friend. I'm sure Sup Forums will be super proud of you. Aren't you glad you fit in with other losers that share your point of view?

His audience is of the most meekly indoctrinated liberal kind. "Bluepilled" for lack of a better word, trained by the narrative to accept certain ideas and fiercely reject others.

Maher himself mostly stands outside of this, follows his own narrative, but the same doesn't go for his audience. You can hear their moronic clapping howlermonkey attitude fall silent in confusion when Maher takes an ambiguous stance on Islam and makes a dig at Hillary; "Aren't these things that bad people say? Aren't I supposed to hate this?" They have a hard time figuring it out.

He knows the liberal scene is a sinking ship, don't get suckered in by the jew.

>le anyone who disagrees with me is from Sup Forums meme

Pretty sure it was the reddit, trump, and cuckspam. You guys are so easy to spot it's ridiculous.

>losers
Winners aren't losers, user.

>you should be wishy washy though
No. A certain degree of conviction is important. I know you're saying people should be open to new ideas, and I agree, but being a wishy washy man who stands for nothing is just worthless.

Do you need a safe space user?

Trash human with trash politics.

No, I just wish you would go back to yours.

>His audience is of the most meekly indoctrinated liberal kind. "Bluepilled" for lack of a better word, trained by the narrative to accept certain ideas and fiercely reject others.
9/11 literally killed it, but hisold show "Politically Incorrect" was actually pretty based and provided a decent forum for discussion on a variety of topics. Usual format was 2 entertainment guests and 2 pundits, having a vaguely moderated discussion about various topics.

As a comedian though... He steals A LOT of material.

>No one liked Hillary, ever

Attaching yourself to somebody and claiming you're a winner for being a beta sheep doesn't make you a winner.

She was a symbol, an identity politics candidate like Obama but really just beheld to corporate interests, like Obama.
Problem is trump was a symbol too and the way he's running back his campaign hyperbole pol are going to have to dust off their delusions about this orange turd.

Bruh it's okay, there are people out there that don't think like you and it's okay. You'll learn to live with it someday.

I hate the team sport mentality to politics. It ruined the nuance.

He went a little overboard with the election stuff, bet he feels the same.

What speech is he talking about here

>He went a little overboard with the election stuff
Didn't everybody?
That was like the global rule this last month.

There would be no eulogies for hilldawg, no photographs of her body would be sold in sundries stores, no people would crowd the streets in the rain to see her funeral cortege, no biographies would be written about her, no children named after her, no one would ever pay twenty-five cents to stand in the rooms she grew up in. The shotgun would ignite, and Bill would scream, but Hillary Clinton would only lay on the floor and look at the ceiling, the light going out of her eyes before she could find the right words.

Yeah, everybody is a sheep except for you.

This is funny, but no for real, he's a right-wing authoritarian populist demagogue, so Idk why anybody's surprised to see the comparison made.

Although, it's not entirely accurate, Hitler was quite intelligent

>everybody

Nahh, just the people who think Trump winning makes them less of a loser.

Good reference and digits, but I think "Huma would scream" fits better. I doubt Bill would give a damn at this point.

>[Clinton] was [...] an identity politics candidate like Obama

Obama was before identity politics. You can say he was an equality candidate, but he actually had political positions he seemed to legitimately care about. Of course he's such a great speaker he seems to legitimately care about just about anything that comes out of his mouth.

Calling Clinton an identity politics candidate is just a sign of, either, how completely out of touch the political left in the US is with modern politics, or, how completely off the reservation identity politics has gone, depending on how you want to look at it. As people who give a fuck about identity politics are so far beyond "female president" that acting like a female president is a big deal is just an insult to anyone who takes that crap seriously. People deep in identity politics want a transracial genderfluid otherkin candidate. A cis-gendered cis-race white woman is just a slap in the face.

and just to put things in perspective, the same number of people who voted for mitt romney voted for donald trump. In fact, "red" voting has been steady for decades. The only time a "blue" president is elected is when that candidate can energize new voters. Something clinton failed to do on any and every level.

Nothing is wrong with naked boys. They have pretty tight assholes for fucking

>Hitler was quite intelligent
He had an undeniablly high EQ, but the third Reich fell largely because of dipshit decisions made personally by Hitler. From dunkirk to stalingrad, its a a parable of the burden of nescience.

>i trust the government completely on 9/11 so i keep my job!

coward

Also all it takes is a little makeup and they'll look just like little girls.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=IYF1iy1_-vc

>wishy washy on his political views.

its almost as if hes jewish

...

>light itself

Holy fuck what a crock of shit

Bill Maher, not Bill Mozart, you dork.

It didn't help that the only Democratic candidate that actually got young voters fired up was screwed so damn hard by the DNC. And they were shocked when they didn't get all of Sanders' supporters. The only people she bothered with were the people who were giving her large sums of money, fuck off if you only managed to give one hundred dollars or less. Meanwhile Bernie was giving speeches to packed auditoriums.

why did I read that, it's like a teenage love letter with every 'i' dotted with a heart.

Hitchens was a quasi-Marxist prick but GOD DAMN I miss him.

Mahler, not Mozart, you stork.

>His audience is of the most meekly indoctrinated liberal kind. "Bluepilled" for lack of a better word

Kike, pedo, vile "human" being, I hope he and his family and friends die a grisly death that lasts for days, I hope he dies last and gets to see his wife and children beheaded before his eyes. I hope they dismember him one limb per three hours.

>i can't attack your argument, so i'll attack the way it's phrased

>bernie got screwed
I think I love this meme most of all.

>le everyone who disagrees with me is ugly meme

Yeah, the DNC totally didn't rig the entire primary in favor of their chosen candidate.

all liberals are c-cucks!
that's right KEKS!

Ah, of course. The DNC clearly colluded with millions upon millions of voters to win Hillary the popular vote. In the future, we should select winners by the amount of bitching coming from their supporters.

>I'm an enlightened freethinker, but everyone that holds a different view than me is an indoctrinated liberal
lol

But this is wrong, there are people on the right that are also completely retarded (see: ancaps, libertarians)

Saying that "liberal" is unironically used as a catch all means you're actually just strawmanning

The DNC colluded with the media. They had a clear cut plan on how to deal with Sanders and they even went as far as to give Hillary debate questions in advance. That was all proven by the wikileaks DNC emails. This is an undisputable fact. The head of the DNC resigned over this.

I honestly don't understand how far someone must be gone ideologically to STILL defend this type of corruption. I get it that you had to defend her during the primaries so Trump wouldn't win, but now, there is literally no reason whatsoever why you'd still defend the corruption of Hillary and the DNC.

Wow. Your reading comprehension needs a lot of work. I was talking about the primaries being rigged. Not the election. Super delegates chose her because of DNC loyalty and votes not being counted. If you voted provisionally, your vote wasn't counted. The people working the booths didn't know what they were doing and when they didn't see your name on their list, you got a provisional ballot, which might as well have gone in the trash.

There was no tampering in the actual election because that would be investigated as opposed to the goings on inside of a political party.

>Coulter, Moore, Marilyn Manson
That show was pretty based given it's fucking ABC of all shows

Hillary and Bill are single handedly responsible for destabilizing Latin America in the 90s, mainly Columbia with project Columbia and El Salvador.

Thanks Clintons!

It's because they think recounts will change things or that the electors will choose her over Trump. Wishful thinking. Once Trump gets sworn in, they might actually look into the corruption of the DNC. Or they won't learn a valuable lesson and we'll get eight years of Trump instead of four.

They didn't commit voter fraud. They committed election fraud. There's a big difference.
They changed the rules of a lot of Bernie supporting areas and key states to sway it in favor of Hillary.
In New York, they changed the hours of polling places in pro-Bernie areas so that people working swing shifts wouldn't be able to vote. In a few other states, they closed a lot of polling places. There were reports of lines nearly a mile long. In Massachusetts, Bill Clinton crashed a key polling place and Bernie ended up losing with a very small margin. That specific one wasn't related to the DNC, but it's still stacking the odds against Bernie.

Conviction is important w/r/t principles, and you'd be hard pressed to find an example of Maher being unprincipled. But there's a big difference between standing by your principles and digging your heels in on every specific issue and never changing your mind.

Not to mention the lack of media attention to his movement. He had places packed with supporters , the Shill had private parties with every single supporter that paid the most for her campaign and that was pretty much it for the primary season.

>wikileaks emails
Haha, you mean the from after it was mathematically impossible for Sanders to win? The ones where they were trying to figure out how to stop Sanders from damaging Hillary in the general when he literally had zero chance of winning whatsoever? Hillary was the candidate. Sanders refusal to concede when he'd already lost was the only thing preventing this from being made official.

Super delegates chose her when she ran against Obama, too. But shit, look at that. Turned out they switched their pledges after Obama won the popular vote. But sure, keep pretending that Super Delegates have anything to do with anything.

Hillary creamed Bernie in the primary. The only states he had a shot in were caucus states specifically because caucuses are shitty and reward the candidate with the more rabid supporters. In sane states, that adopt a primary system that's more representative of electorate, Hillary won pretty much across the board.

its already a little late in some ways both the minority leaders of the house and senate are neoliberals.

I agree with this. He gives off a very smug and annoying aura i think is a bit grating, but even though I don't agree with him politically I respect his opinions because he (usually) doesn't just blindly parrot things he's supposed to say. Especially regarding Islam. Also he genuinely has a good sense of humor and his writing staff is very good. I saw his bit on Brexit where he said "It looks like Great Britain chose Pride and Prejudice over Sense and Sensibility". Didn't agree but thought it was an excellent joke.

Well, good thing you democrats are fucking retards and nominated the worst, most scandal-ridden candidate in American history, because Bernie would most likely have beaten Trump.

definitely this. thank you.

damn...

>but the third Reich fell largely because of dipshit decisions made personally by Hitler. From dunkirk to stalingrad, its a a parable of the burden of nescience.
Meme history. Nazi Germany was bound to fail the moment they started mass industrialization and borrowing money. Their economy would've collapsed had not been for the war with Poland. Military decisions were moot, Germany never had a chance and got very lucky fighting France and Great Britain.

>Bernie would most likely have beaten Trump.
Shit, I take back what I said earlier. This is my favorite meme.

Keep living in your fantasy land where the admitted socialist who hangs out with dictators on the reg would have a chance in hell in winning any general election in America. I hear that goes over real well the white working class voters who swung the election.

You shills will twist and turn every word until it's in your favor. You deny every single report about corruption. It's no wonder she lost to the most reprehensible candidate in modern history. Keep crying "fair and square" till you're blue in the face, it won't change facts. No one trusts her. Winning the popular vote means diddly when we still have the Electoral College determining who the president will be.

Without the super delegates, the race was much closer (and would have been in his favor if it wasn't for all the DNC interference). The only difference between Sanders and Obama (other than white/black) is that Sanders was an independent running on the Democrat ballot, while Obama has been a Democrat from the start. That (and his plans going against them making money from all their banker friends) is the real reason they worked in favor of Clinton every single step of the way.

Bernie had a higher approval rating than either of them. Even among socialist hating republicans, he was viewed as more trustworthy than Clinton or Trump.

The race would have at least been more interesting between Sanders and Trump than it was with Clinton instead.

Well, it's not like Hillary had any chance getting the white working class vote. The people who swung the election were working class voters who voted out of frustration. They voted for change and against the establishment. Guess what Hillary stood for.

>Posts pic that looks like 99% of progressive numales
What did he mean by this?

Start with George Carlin
Then take away the comedic talent and replace it with a high douche factor and you have Bill Mahr.

>stating the facts is twisting words
You're the one who's engaging in specious argument by submitting shitty evidence irrespective of any context or sense. It's why you just blindly shout about "muh emails" without understanding anything about them. Or your insistence that super delegates have any bearing on the process when they've never voted contrary to the popular vote. Or why you refuse to acknowledge the very clear and understandable reason Sanders only ever did well in caucus states.

It's really simple. Sanders was only popular with a small subset of the population. The vast majority favored Clinton. This is borne out in literally every metric we have. But you'd rather turn to conspiracy theory bullshit because you can't handle the fact that you lost.

Polls mean literally nothing that early in a race. Sanders had faced virtually zero opposition. The Clinton campaign was intentionally going light on him in an effort not to alienate his supporters. This would hardly be the case in the general election against a republican opponent. But I wouldn't expect you to have any real concept of how polling in presidential elections work. I take it this was the first you could vote in?

I'm not talking about the general election. I'm talking about the primary. Hillary lost because she didn't actually offer anything. She didn't seriously push policy, and she didn't hard counter any of Trump's bullshit.

She seemed content to give trump enough rope to hang himself with, and it blew up in her face.

I never said anything about the emails. That wasn't me. I suppose it is easier to assume that there is only one person in this thread who thinks of Sanders as a better candidate than the Shill. It helps your "only a tiny group of people liked him" narrative.

Direct your eyes to
That group of voters essentially cost her the election. Guess who they might have voted for if she wasn't the Democratic candidate. I'm willing to bet they would have had listened to what Bernie had to say with more interest than what the least trustworthy Democratic candidate had to say.

>This is borne out in literally every metric we have.
I like how you say I don't show any evidence and you throw things like this out there without any sources.

I actually voted for Obama for his first term (I was unable to vote for him a second time because I moved and hadn't changed my status) and that was my first time voting.

In the end, your candidate lost and I hope that's the final nail in her political coffin. Everyone who voted for her is pointing fingers at everyone but themselves and they can either find their flaws and fix them, cut out the corruption that they keep denying is there and win back the white house in four years or they can keep struggling to find a viable candidate to trick voters into thinking they have their backs.

Trying to spin political humor is hard to do because its out of date as soon as the joke is normally said.

And I didn't only talk about emails in that post, dipshit. I apologize for being thorough. In the future, I'll only respond to the explicit retarded points you make about super delegates and Bernie having any shot in hell in winning the general. We wouldn't want to mistakenly group you in with emailfags. That would clearly be a bridge too far.

>Guess who they might have voted for if she wasn't the Democratic candidate
Not Sanders. That much is obvious. It must be nice that he didn't win the primary. It lets you continue to believe in this fantasy wherein nothing negative is ever seriously levied against Sanders and so he's never forced to answer difficult questions or face a significantly higher level of scrutiny.

Used to watch his show. I even attended a taping when I was given a shirt because I was literally the only person that identified as a republican when asked.

Then I realized he's a shill for Israel and stopped watching or caring about him.

oh so NOW we believe wikileaks emails

in the case of wikileaks emails confirming something i dont want to be true, i'll just deny it and call it fake news, right?

How can someone who is anti Islam be such a cuck?

Ooh. Name calling. So sophisticated. Just what I expect from a Shill. Bear in mind that the name I'm calling you refers to what you type, as opposed to a knee jerk reaction to me telling you that your corporate groveling heroine isn't going to ever become president. I know, it's a fatal blow coming to terms with losing.

I know you said other things and I would love, just love to waste the entirety of my day picking it all apart, but I'm only devoting a small amount of my time to this.

What kind of dirt do you think they would have on someone who has been fighting for the rights of the American people for decades? That he once littered? How scandalous.

I don't know, letting the english leave at dunkirk, and not consolidating the eastern european acquisition, or taking out rssian rails so they couldn't pack their industrial base all fucked them pretty bad.
Not to mention declaring war on the US in a show of solidarity with the nips brought the US into the war which meant an actual 2 front war with two nations that could out produce nazi germany by several orders of magnitude.
I mean a winning campaign wasn't out of the question if they played their cards right. Not Hitler's picture perfect plan, but something damn close.

Do you see me in here bitching about losing? Hillary beat Bernie. You're the one bitching, I'm the one explaining why you're retarded.

>What kind of dirt do you think they would have on someone who has been fighting for the rights of the American people for decades?
It's telling that you clearly know so little about the candidate you're dead set on championing. There's a reason the republicans pushed the emails thing with Clinton so hard. It's literally all they had. Sanders is entirely different. He has serious baggage as an outspoken socialist, who pals around with dictators. The bad kind, the ones that aren't allies of America. His associations with Castro would have cost him Florida alone, much less the rest of middle America.

This shit isn't difficult to find. A cursory google search will provide you with all the necessary details:

medium.com/@sashastone/ten-reasons-bernie-sanders-would-not-and-could-not-have-beaten-trump-b596674c1c93#.5nbzmzrww

Nooo Sanders was perfect and the media wouldn't have called him a communist who writes rape porn 24/7.

Seriously, Sup Forums is not the "pulse" of White, non-urban America.

There is a reason Sup Forums went from RON PAUL to SANDERS to TRUMP GOD EMPRAH, even though that is a senseless journey from an ideological standpoint. 4channers want a White dude that can easily be turned into a meme and makes them feel "different" and avant-garde. Sanders would have been even less ready for media hit jobs.

You don't need to bitch about her losing to detect all the butthurt in your posts. I haven't complained, I've accused. I accepted that it was a raw deal from the DNC. I've accepted that no matter the outcome, one Bernie was out, I wasn't going to be pleased with the election.

And the Shill has connections with big banks and big oil. Which one do you think I find to be more harmful to us?

It's telling that you think I care about any of this. We areally essentially waving our dicks on the Internet. If you want to take this seriously, be my guest. I haven't bothered since you popped up defending the DNC. You keep giving me reasons to reply and that's exactly what I do.

Just because democratic socialism scares you doesn't mean it would scare everyone in America. It appears to work in Europe, but what do they know?