Your cat is an African immigrant, throw it away

your cat is an African immigrant, throw it away

wtf I hate (((cats))) now

so it's almost every single domesticated animal and vegetable whites eat

Humans are African immigrants

i mean from non white lands

What's the point of this thread?

not all african beings are bad you know, cute tunisian girls are also very welcome

But I am African

log church burner guy vs indescribable horrors guy, who wins

According to prof. Vikernes Europeans are 97% Neanderthal and 3% Asian

Lovecraft's wife wasn't autistic

>lovecraft
>good
kys

>Like dogs more than cats
>Turn your entire nation into a colossal failure

Why do people do this?

Fixed that for you.

>China
>likes dogs
I dont think the study is about food

>implying they don't eat cats too
>implying they don't eat rats too
>implying they wouldn't eat human on a bad day

am i welcome too??

Ooa was recently debunked. Oldest ancestor remains were found in the balkans. The environment of the past, Europe looked like Africa today and no reason exist to support ooa besides he age of bones. Also varg has brown hair, now grey. What a misleadinpost.

Cats are shit. Varg is wrong about 99.9% of everything but he's spot on about this. Of course, treating cats as pest control is okay.

r u a girllllll?

No, but she was a Jew

You can't really use one piece of remains to debunk an entire valley in Ethiopia. Shouldn't there be a trillion remains all over the balkans?

>was implying either were good
was actually implying that both would browse Sup Forums if they were born in the 90s

OoA is specifically about the last 100000 years.
It doesn't change anything that human evolution occurred in both Africa and Eurasia millions of years before that.

There's so many remains in the rift valley because it was ideal for preservation, and if the Balkan population was older, less remains would likely be preserved. The number of remains in different areas isn't the question, their chronology is.

Last month they found another "oldest homo sapiens remains" in Morocco.

at least cats can be trained to poo in a box

No one's claiming it did, this is specifically in regards to OoA II.
I wouldn't be surprised at a North African or general Mediterranian origin for Homo Sapiens as opposed to Sub-Saharan, the Moroccan remains uncovered (as well as other early remains) had general Hamitic features if I remember correctly, the evidence now seems to point to a Med origin for modern humans rather than Congolese or South African. Negroid SSA features are most likely a result of H. Erectus admixture (which I think there has been some genetic evidence for suggested) in the same way that Eurasian features are a result of Neanderthal admixture (I don't buy the ultra-recent origin of features the Neanderthals coincidentally had in the same region) and Australoids are pretty much latter-day Denisovans.

M8 you are dumb. Part of the reason OOA hasn't been "debunked" as you so put it, is because Africa has a giant collection of sapien bones from pre sapien species on top of having a large concentration of sapien fossils.

Homo bones*

Deducing evolution based on the LOCATION of remains goes well beyond the realms of mere retardation.

You know it's all redundant classification, right? Early homo sapiens weren't like us, their brains were small until they invented fire and cooking.

Not surprised this showcase of mental retardation comes from an American

Out of North Africa is still OoA.
Still, according to recent genetic studies the San people of South Africa split from other humans a quarter of a million years ago.
At this point it's difficult to say where this happened but it didn't happen in the Balkans that's for sure.

It would explain their nigger-like personalities.

Deducing evolution from location, chronology (that means what time the bones are from if your English isn't so good), and how population genetics fits into that, actually. Leave it to a Swecuck to mindlessly defend OoA II as if it itself isn't a theory based on the exact same educated conjecture from thin avaliable evidence that is now calling it into question. Evolutionary anthropology has always been a shaky field with hard migration timelines and relations being difficult to pin down and subject to alternate interpretations, the fact you seem so dogmatically devoted to the current prevailing hypothesis suggests you don't really know or care how scientific revision and critique works.
Shouldn't you be inviting some migrants over for pasta?

>...human beings, negroes, or pterodactyls
KEK, now what the fuck could've cows and sheep have done to him