SHALL

SHALL

NOT

BE

INFRINGED

Any """"American"""" who supports gun control should fuck off to one of their beloved communist shitholes so they can get fucking murdered.

Other urls found in this thread:

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

...

...

I agree.

They are anti-american and should be treated as enemies and traitors.

Preaching to the choir here.

Savage chink lady.

I would fight tyranny with her any day of the week. Afterwards she can suck on my Lo Mein noodle.

>muh poor stoodents!
>muh democracy!
Yeah, cause allowing a bunch of deluded 'Murricaboos to destroy your country and throw it into chaos is such a better alternative!

A couple hundred years of armed patriots hasn't thrown us into chaos yet.

She seems a rittle ronery. She needs her rabia ricked.

kek kys my man. your countr\y is poor shithole

>Any """"American"""" who supports gun control should fuck off to one of their beloved communist shitholes so they can get fucking murdered.

How about you fuck off limey. The 2nd amendment had nothing to do with semi autos or whatever you gun fuckers believe.

>The 2nd amendment had nothing to do with semi autos or whatever you gun fuckers believe.
debunked

>your countr\y is poor shithole
Sure, but at least we don't have those pesky commies in power anymore.
Better ded than red :^)

>their beloved communist shitholes so they can get fucking murdered
The shit holes are safer than the US.

Yes it has.

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state..."


Are you in the Army? Then no guns.

We are going to take all your guns away that can shoot more than one round per minute.

Then we are going to repeal the second amendment.

ty based carol

Based chink woman. Hopefully she won't send her kids off to (((university))) in ignorance.

God bless, Brit. And God bless Britain.

how are those cartels working out Jose?

>We're going to repeal and make millions of people criminals
Yeah okay faggot. pic related.

>Are you in the Army? Then no guns.

States define what a militia is, not the federal government.

>We are going to take all your guns away that can shoot more than one round per minute.

>Then we are going to repeal the second amendment.

Must've been a good dream.

>semi autos and machine guns have early prototypes around time founding fathers were around
>they have no clue they would be made and have nothing to do with our 2nd amendment

if you are going to be retarded atleast try to understand history a little better

...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
because you need might need a militia to keep the state free, the you can have a gun and it shall not be infringed

Be my guest faggot. I hope it's you who comes and trys to take them. We'll see how long you want to keep doing that

Gun control is no solution.

We have gun control in here, guess what? it fucking does nothing.

''Bad guys'' still will have their guns '
''Good guys'' will be disarmed
''Cuck guys'' will be pleased

Must be sad to have lost your dick....

>says the man afraid of guns

Some people like that kinda thing

My compadre knows what's up

In England we say it as preaching to the converted. Makes you think, doesn't it?

Thanks mom.

There's a comma in there, friend.

Just the comparatively recent cultural enrichers.

Is 50 years long enough to say the experiment didn't work?

Far more mass shootings will be prevented if guns are banned. The average American does not have links or contacts with illegal arms rackets. Most of them would be caught in honeypots. A lot of people will be saved. I don't see why anyone has need for a rapid firing gun. You need guns for hunting, take a rifle or a shotgun. Why do you need a sub machine gun to defend yourself?

If you don't own a handgun and/or rifle, you can't call yourself a man. Now go back to mommy and ask her to take you to the mall kid :^)

>india knows anything about gun culture

Take a look at what it takes to get a sub machine gun in the US next time you use the street

>"We kind of need an army but we just finished getting BTFO by a tyrant's. Not good. So we will never take your guns folks. So important!"

Easier for you?

I need a sub machine gun to send street shitters back to their call center in India

And how do you plan on taking them when we refuse to comply?
You're not gonna use guns are you? That would be rather hypocritical.

>We have gun control here...

You have gun laws; you don't have gun control, or control over any of your laws.

But that's not your fault; it is the fault of the USA that funnels guns and cash across your borders.

See, the problem with everyone on this board is that you live in your heads. You think the narrative in your head is the world instead of just a story of the world that can be wrong.
You can't know anything about the world; all you can do is make up a story, then compare it to the world.

And what you don't get is that when you make up a story where you are the pussy victim of the big bad government that doesn't even exist but is merely a story in someone else's head, you end up wasting time trying to corroborate smoke.
This is the way the world works: if you don't do something, it doesn't happen.
No guns to Mexico; Mexico doesn't get guns. No one dies from guns.

But you morons have to interject things that don't matter, like the boogie man that isn't there.
A B test it. Guns in America = mass shootings. No guns in Austrailia = no mass shootings.

Times America has defended itself from its totalitarian government with guns? Zero.


The number of idiot who will say, "That's because we have the guns!" and think that makes sense? = every moron on this board.

Who will take the guns?

(cont.)

But let's just look at the totalitarian statement of OP. Who the fuck says it cannot be infringed? It obviously can be infringed any time someone infringes it.

See, you morons hide in rights, and defend those rights with force, just like the authoritarians, AND NOT WITH RESPECT FOR THE LAW, which is what the constitution is about.

YOU are the traitors just trying to circumvent the LAW for your totalitarian aims.

Because you are psychotic and think you are persecuted.

Because you have no respect for the law.

Because YOU are the traitors.

SO why should we let you have guns any more than letting Terrorists have guns?

>India is an untapped source of gov shills
It's like seeing the first poo in our loo.

Can you imagine, living in a legal weed state, legal open and conceal carry, growing the plant and rocking back and forth on a chair on your porch with an AR in hands, flying whatever fucking flag on your property that you want...

>Times America has defended itself from its totalitarian government with guns? Zero.
America was created that way bootlicker. Also, see the Bundy standoff.

We have a human right to bear arms, the president is attempting to strip us of that illegally. He is destroying our democracy, this has gone well past the point where debating matters.

What the fuck does it matter if we disagree with a law that king obama has already fucking made? You socialist tool.

Yeah whatever you say faggot, anyone want to play a game?

>See, you morons hide in rights, and defend those rights with force, just like the authoritarians, AND NOT WITH RESPECT FOR THE LAW, which is what the constitution is about.
This is some top tier double-speak fantasy. You're a complete sophist. The constitution guarantees those rights and the second amendment guarantees us the right to defend them with arms. You're a traitor.

Rolls royce

what the fuck is wrong with Piers Morgan he doesn't even live here anymore and he wants us to lose our gun rights fuck him

Fuck off, traitor.

>some of the most enlightened thinkers of the time gather around to found a nation based on the enlightened principles of individual freedom enshrining their values in a constitution to ensure tyranny should never overtake the land and providing protections so that it should never happen
>government has become precisely what was dreaded, a tyrannous surveillance state with no respect for the principles on which it was founded or its citizens, with both republicans and democrats violating constitutional law or re-interpreting it to fit their agenda, and it's only getting worse
>there are people arguing to surrender the final protection the founding fathers provided

It's like two totally different species of human beings. You have people who value individuality and independence, gun owners and freemarketeers, and then you have the left wing spectrum, socialists and social justice warriors, who think with their feels and want to ban guns. The United States was founded on the principles of the first, but it's governed, through the media and universities, primarily by the second. It seems incredibly tense and polarized. One thing is for sure: if they get your guns, you've had it.

(cont)

None of you are Americans. Americans are individuals who work together, not sheep following a leader. And in working together we respect the rules that work, and change the ones that don't.
Individuality requires trusting other individuals.
Individuality requires that you have a story in your head that matches the world, and that that story matches other people's story precisely because the story matches the world, NOT THE OTHER PERSONS STORY.

This board is full of followers and sheep. You don't have the honesty to look at the world.

You are cowards who can only look at your fears.

No wonder you follow a moron like Trump. He is playing you, and that is why we are going to take your guns.

we also have the battle at athens

Ever hear of the Battle of Athens (1946)?
Americans use guns to overthrow a corrupt and tyrannical local government.

...

>Individuality requires trusting other individuals.

That's rich coming from someone who doesn't trust anyone with a gun.

Go fuck yourself.

No we don't you fag.

>We have a human right to bear arms..

Oh? You were born with a gun coming out of your ass? Guns grow on trees and you can pick them?

You disgrace the legacy that made you...

top kek

agreed

HAHAH ! Whose the fucking sophist now? How does a piece of paper guarantee anything you double-moron?

Look up the word "agreement". Then cower from your pathetic stupidity.

17 get

>I don't know what rights are the post

good luck fagit!

>muh ar15

i hate these conformist faggots. Go big, push for de-regularization of full autos and shotguns. the 2nd amendment also covers those. But oh no, you wont hear that from the NRA since they want their autos to stay expensive. Fucking hypocrites

The guns guarantee the constitution, which is a philosophical document that has to be defended. That's why its the second amendment, stupid fag.

>And in working together we respect the rules that work, and change the ones that don't.
No we don't, not anymore. There are many, many rules that the majority disagree with and that don't work, are against the constitution, and are still enforced by the government through violence and suppression. Go think for yourself instead of following a communist-totalitarian brain washing philosophy.

You beggar the question. Who says I don't trust others with guns? I don't trust with guns those absolutist who are so stupid as to not notice all the guns they cannot, by law own.

I don't trust those so Platonic and so stupid, they think that the world is run by immutable rules that make things so, like a piece of paper or a bible or koran they worship.

I don't trust anyone who won't change when the world that is, and is immutable, comes and smacks them in the face with the failure of their story to tell them anything useful about the world.

I don't trust the dumb, and that is why we make up rules that fit the world, like, if you don't have a gun that can shoot forever, you can't kill so many people.

When the world doesn't support the story, you change the story.

You know what law is immutable? I'll fucking kill you if you try and take my guns.

How is fun control even plausible in the states? As soon as they are about to ban guns surely the only people not stock piling guns are going to sell them to the people who are. I'm pretty sure those things don't stop working the second they're banned.

[citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed][citation needed]

Action beats reaction. You'll be dead before you reach your gun.

You think you're some kind of genius philosopher but you're just an obfuscating sophist bootlicker.

You know you're wrong and basing things in belief when you can't dispute any arguments, just laugh and then reiterate another aspect of your philosophy like a preacher.

the most disgusting thing is that the NRA got congress to prevent the CDC from actually researching gun violence.

While most gun owners (myself included) would like to find ways to reduce gun misuse while preserving the rights of citizens to bear arms, NRA fanatics won't even let the government conduct research to that end.

I think it really shows you what kind of people the gun extremists are.

Roll iiiin

is she a midget tho?

Continue reading, please. Why do liberals ALWAYS stop reading once they get to the "security of a free state" part?

Your country can't really be compared with the US desu

>Far more mass shootings will be prevented if guns are banned.
This is true, and we're going to end up with the 2nd amendment repealed if the NRA keeps up its extremist bullshit.

87 pls

>See, the problem with everyone on this board is that you live in your heads. You think the narrative in your head is the world instead of just a story of the world that can be wrong.
You can't know anything about the world; all you can do is make up a story, then compare it to the world.

user thats called having beliefs, some based on philosophy, morals, and facts.

>And what you don't get is that when you make up a story where you are the pussy victim of the big bad government that doesn't even exist but is merely a story in someone else's head, you end up wasting time trying to corroborate smoke.
This is the way the world works: if you don't do something, it doesn't happen.
No guns to Mexico; Mexico doesn't get guns. No one dies from guns.

>But you morons have to interject things that don't matter, like the boogie man that isn't there.
>A B test it. Guns in America = mass shootings. No guns in Austrailia = no mass shootings.

You're fucking retarded if you actually believe this. In some instances yes, a disarmed populace will lead to less mass shooting, and less media coverage, but those are muh feels arguments. No one likes to see a crowd of innocents gunned down. Now lets talk statistically. A majority of gun crime happens in low income crime heavy cities. I.E. gang violence. Now are you really going to try and make an argument that criminals wont find guns, illegaly or legally? If theres a demand there will always be a supply. Whether its slavshit weapons brought in a boat or plane from south america, or bootlegged guns, there will always be a market for weapons. Whether its for some nig or spic to settle a score, make quick money, or a citizen trying to protect their family, country and assets.

>Times America has defended itself from its totalitarian government with guns? Zero.

What is the revolutionary war, the entire reason the second amendment was written faggot

Criminals are people too. Do you favor felons having the right to own guns?

You are just mad because you know I am right. You are just wrong because you know I haven't said anything that doesn't make sense. YOU are the one who puts the cart before the horse and has to make up a heaven and Ideal forms and physical laws that are indisputable to confuse your narrative with the world.

I make up and inherit the stories then hold them up against the world to see if they reflect.

I am not fooled by the Sophistry and Platonism that mistakes the Narrative with the world.
I leave that up to the Bluepilled on this board.

The only Red Pill is to know that everything you know is a story, is THE NARRATIVE. And the only way you don't fall into the trap of the believing and BOOTLICKING of your master's Narrative, is to check it out for yourself.

The Pragmatist finds narratives that are useful to be believed. It is useful to be believed that without guns, people wouldn't get shot.
It is useful to be believed that if we restrict by agreement, the ability to kill with guns, then fewer people would die from guns.
It is useful to believe many things in the situation they present themselves, like General Relativity and Newtonian physics, even though they don't agree with each other.

Wake up asshole! The bullshit has got you!

Wikileaks has proven that there was no massacre but rather a few casualties...
(American diplomatic memos)
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html

I personally don't
but you can make the argument that the point of prison is for them to serve their time and then get their rights back when they leave

tl;dr I am a huge cuck pussy faggot that needs to commit suicide at the earliest possible opportunity

Felons lost their rights the moment they committed a felony by taking another person's right.

Stop talking in this fucking bullshit pseudo-intellectual speak, you elitist fuck.

>I don't trust with guns those absolutist who are so stupid as to not notice all the guns they cannot, by law own.

That's why no one can legally purchase a firearm without a background check first. If they cannot legally own a firearm, THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO. If they get one illegaly, THEN GUN CONTROL WILL DO NOTHING TO STOP IT. This is the main problem with you gun-grabbing fucks, you WILL NOT, EVER, ACCEPT this fact.

Prescriptions, for example. I cannot by law buy prescription meds I don't need. If I have a prescription from a licenced doctor, I will legally be able to buy my medication. If I don't need them, and I still want to get high off my rocker, then I will go and illegally purchase them. The law can do nothing to stop me.

I don't trust those so Platonic and so stupid, they think that the world is run by immutable rules that make things so, like a piece of paper or a bible or koran they worship.

So you're saying religion is the problem, not guns. It begs the question of why you want all guns banned.

>Some childs are allergic to some medications, and they will never know they're allergic until they take the medications themselves.
>We should ban all medications just in case.

The rest is just literally you jerking your ego in front of everyone. So go fuck yourself, you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about.

Most people own guns in Australia, actually. We have restrictions, we didn't ban them.

If we didn't live in a fucktarded society, we wouldn't need guns. But here we are, so fuck it, I own two pistols and two rifles.

It's also based on genetics, American Southerners mutated differently than Europeans and Yankees. Southerners have higher levels of aggression which leads to a natural affinity to firearms. My country's gun culture is controlled by short tempered fat rednecks and it's awful.

Communist who is against gun control here, leave it senpai

We're saying the Idealism of the constitution is defended with the hard reality of an armed and informed populace. You need Idealism to fight for, you need practicality to fight for it. They operate as twin systems which sustain freedom. Your real world shit is all nonsense, humanity is always activated and inspired through thought and idealism. Everything you've said doesn't make sense.

Wow take that and shove if up your sorry asses mexicans.

That is a real immigrant.

>But let's just look at the totalitarian statement of OP. Who the fuck says it cannot be infringed? It obviously can be infringed any time someone infringes it.

>See, you morons hide in rights, and defend those rights with force, just like the authoritarians, AND NOT WITH RESPECT FOR THE LAW, which is what the constitution is about.

>YOU are the traitors just trying to circumvent the LAW for your totalitarian aims.

>Because you are psychotic and think you are persecuted.

>Because you have no respect for the law.

>Because YOU are the traitors.

>SO why should we let you have guns any more than letting Terrorists have guns?

You see my pigheaded traitorous friend, the second amendment much like the first was not written to defend your cuck feelings, it was written to give american citizens the power to protect and defend themselves from people who seek to erode our rights as citizens of this country, its a very simple concept user, one you clearly cannot grasp. Like it or not, it is LAW, and will remain LAW as long as there are americans who feel that these are still rights that should be afforded to them. But let me humor your delusion, lets say we do give up these rights. The right to defend ourselves, and the right to speak freely. What then? Do we accept what we see in canada and europe? People being arrested for thought? Being arrested for fucking defending themselves? I think not, you can suck my red white and blue cock commiecuck.

You're the traitor here.

wow i feel so enslaved being able to go to school and nightclubs and not worry about getting shot because guns are all but banned here. And i really hate how my government oppresses me with all that free healthcare and education. Banning guns will never work america

Shall not be infringed you Anti-American sack of shit.

>It is useful to be believed that if we restrict by agreement, the ability to kill with guns, then fewer people would die from guns.

Stop typing a fucking novel and kill yourself

Criminals dont normally buy guns legally, and have their IDs scratched off them. Especially gangs, holy fuck are they retarded up until the point where they get guns from across the border w/ no IDs. Its like they could have been something.

Anyways, why take guns from non criminals? Just make the process tougher.