This is stealing

this is stealing

your a stealing

No, they paid for them.

I mean, sure you could consider it that, but it takes a lot of talent and a certain ear to be able to make something new with so many disparate samples that were never meant to be mixed like that. There are so many little things that are sampled just for a few seconds and it's just such an impressive spectacle to listen to. It's also fun.

They cleared all the samples before release, though.

did you get their permission to post this album cover??

It's plunderphonics but honestly I don't think you know that's a thing that exists for around 7 decades so it's ok you are an ignorant.

How's the neckbeard and fedora feelin today OP?

>sampling is stealing (but pirating music isn't)

making copies and sharing them on internet isn't crime. profiting by other's works is.

intellectual property is a fucking meme

Sampling isn't stealing if it's transformative tho

>Action 1 lets you take things without repercussions
>Action 2 lets you take things but you have to pay for them and surrender an amount of revenue as royalty
>Bruh piracy isn't stealing but sampling is baka
Really makes me think

Digital media has no monetary value

By that standard then sampling is legal and not stealing either, since the music sampled is digital.

copy right law 101 right here.
the reason parodies that sound exactly the same are ok legally because they transform something about the original content

intellectual property my dude

This is wrong.

by this logic any musician who uses a guitar shouldn't get paid because they didn't invent the guitar.

>>downloads music illegally
>>defends the act of sharing copies

pic related

what is the contradiction?

Smartest guy in the thread right here