FUCK DRUMPF

FUCK DRUMPF
FUCK WHITE PEOPLE
HE IS RACIST
HE GOT TWO SCOOPS
HIS FACE IS ORANGE

...

This album was OK.

Left isn't good either.

thank you, right-wing capitalist fascist industrial death machine, without you I wouldn't own this computer on which I can browse porn sites and pictures of 1980s fashion models for 8+ hours a day.

Kino album.

...

I wish this album were edgier. It just felt really tame compared to all the post-punk and no wave stuff they were pulling from. Rather just listen to Filth or Cop tbdesu.

>no wave begins and ends with Swans
I really share a board with people like you.

centrism is pretty radical, I'm doing sick rail slides on the fence and none of you bogus ideologicucks can stop my cool moves.

Where did I imply that? Swans is obviously their big influence and it sounds no where near as vicious as that.

COS HE'S A REAL MAN
COS HE'S A REAL
MANNN

I dunno, "right wing capitalist fascist industrial death machine" would be a pretty cool technical metal band

no, tech death and prog don't have long-ass names

You can have some legitimately radical beliefs and still end up "centrist" if you aren't a retarded commie or Ayn Rand cocksucker, it's a limitation of the political compass

yep

collectivism leads to death
anarchy is the way

Anarchy is unsustainable, local powerholders will take liberty from those without power to grow their own domain, collapsing the anarchic state into a system of warlords and feudalism worse than the democracy it replaced.

The Chaudelande albums are much better, especially the second one. It's raw af long noisy jams over a motorik beat, repetitive basslines, and a guy shouting in a echo pedal, done right. I wish I had the opportunity to see them back then.

what is the font

The computer was made by the workers, not an abstract ideology.

Is that why the most advanced computer the Soviets made was a clone of the capitalist Zilog Corporation's Z80?

Anarchy lmao it's like you aren't aware of mankind's evil nature

I guess. The point is, it's made people. How the people are paid and what they are allowed to do it, that's the whole capitalism/communism debate.

made by people*
what they are allowed to do*
Fuck my English, you know what I mean.

The Soviet version of the Internet was proposed but never advanced because it conflicted with the bureaucratic clout of various ministers who had final say over production. In a capitalist system, if it is profitable, it will be produced. ARPANET, on the other hand, is not a product of capitalism but (ironically) the Military Industrial complex.

But more importantly for a consumer, communism has a central governing body attempting to control both prices and production levels. They barely managed to do that for fucking wheat and vodka, how would they manage a trillion dollar semiconductor fab?

helvetica

Interesting. But oh well that's a different matter. I'm just saying, "capitalism" doesn't make anything. At best it's a tool. People will always be the ones to make things.

People are irrelevant to the flow of capital that makes that production viable. Replace people with machines, goats, wizards; all that changes is the cost of labor. Supply and demand are not effected.