Okay Sup Forums I have a serious question. Everytime theres a shooting, theres a Sup Forums thread about how it was completely staged with actors/etc. My question is, if the government is actually setting these things up, why would they bother with actors? Why dont they just get the operators to do a real massacre? It seems like you could save a lot of money and theres a lot less "loose ends"
Thanks senpai
In otherwords, Sandy Hook or Orlando, for instance. Why bother with a fake massacre when a real one would be just as easy?
most people who post these "staged acted massacres" are the same people who believe in Satan worshiping jewish cabals. Seriously, ask any of them what their religious affiliations are, most are not athiest.
Ask a flat earth believer to sit down with a hollow earth believer.
after 10 minutes of talking, im sure they would agree more with each other than a scientist.
In b4 logical argument gets called a shill
Because if there is still a loose end and people find out about it, the government has to deal with the backlash from slaughtering a lot of its own people. That brings rage from the people, as well as the UN and the US's enemies.
If people find out it was staged, there will still be anger, but no one was killed, so it can be better dealt with.
Like how the sole survivor of the Kingsmill massacre claimed he heard British accents from the shooters, even though they were dressed as the IRA.
.....nope
because people don't want to believe that reality is fucked up and brutal
but it is
this
I'm sure some of them have been set up but I think most of the time they just manipulate things in the media to gain more power. But really, who the fuck knows? It could also have to do with the fact that we live in a pretty fucked up world with fucked up people who have fucked up ideologies.
>My question is, if the government is actually setting these things up, why would they bother with actors?
bc patriot act, you ignorant faggot
propaganda is legal
murder is not
Your a fucking idiot. In Kingsmill, they purposefully let the Catholic go
Its not like he escaped. And they were loyalists, not regulars
>the government never does anything illegal
Hey weed, whats up
While I've got you here, how did Moriarty survive?
Sup Forums btfo?
test
>why would they bother with actors? Why dont they just get the operators to do a real massacre?
Because if real people die, there is no guarantee that 100% of them (family/survivors) will spew gun-control propaganda every time you put a camera in front of them. With crisis actors, you know exactly what they are going to say to the cameras, because you give them a script.
>WE MUST BAN DE EVIL ASSAULT WEABONS BEFO ONE MORE CHILRENS DIES LIKE MY BABY!!
Plus real victims families look into shit, and start to figure crap out, very bad for a mass propaganda event like a 'mass shooting' for gun control.
Sup Forums is always BTFO, but never the way you think it will be
Delete this
>niggahs on camera
Thats why you take the 4 or 5 out of 50 people who said the right thing, and play the same footage over and over. And you coach them a bit before interviews. "Is there anything you'd like to say about these things happening in the future? Maybe about education, or *ahem* gun control?"
You wouldnt understand this is you didnt work in the entertainment industry, but putting your average civilian in front of a camera is like a deer in head lights. They will say literally anything you tell them to avoid looking foolish in front of millions of people
Yes, they did let those who claimed to be Catholics go. And the survivor was shot, but pretended to be dead.
Everyone blamed the IRA claiming it was a sanctioned hit, and they denied any involvement. The survivor claims he heard the shooters talking and said they had British accents. He also claims he believes that it was a British false flag.
There is also the information that has come out recently that one of the IRA's officers, who ordered many attacks, (ones that killed many civilians at that) was a British agent, so it's not so far fetched to consider that the British would false flag and blame the IRA.
Where did you get the information that the shooters were just loyalists? Or did you pull it out of your ass?
Where did you get the information that they were regulars?
I never claimed they were loyalists or regulars, I said what the survivor claims. I also said I wouldn't put it past the British to false flag since information has come out that they had a mole in the IRA's ranks that ordered attacks that killed a lot of civilians.
Now answer my question, faggot, or fuck off with your bullshit. YOU made a claim with certainty that the shooters were loyalists, now deliver your source.
that's really a question for the people who coordinate such things, rather than the people who expose them. but:
1. because they don't have to
2. because it's easier to control the narrative
3. because it's easier to find liars than murderers
>logical argument
it's actual an ad hom genetic fallacy