Politico finds that a stunning 90% of Trump's followers on twitters are reliable voters; 11% of which have never voted before.
Politico finds that a stunning 90% of Trump's followers on twitters are reliable voters; 11% of which have never voted...
Connor Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
stirista.com
twitter.com
Hunter Stewart
...
Camden Reyes
THIS IS A SLIDE ATTEMPT
DO NOT RESPOND WITHOUT SAGE
→ →
→ →
Lincoln Mitchell
How can you tell if a voter is reliable if he's never voted before?
Easton Diaz
We are the 90%
Blake Jones
no it's not you dumb argentine nigger
Aiden Adams
Because they voted in the primaries you idiot.
Henry Bell
SLIDE THREAD
L
I
D
E
Adam Clark
sage
Easton Collins
So voting in one election makes them reliable?
Luke Brown
sorry for trying to bring you guys good news
voting in a primary is one of the highest indicators of voting in the general
Robert Thomas
90% + 11% = 111%
> american education
Justin Ross
>they're STILL talking about the taco bowl tweet
Dylan Sanchez
>
Kevin Turner
>german comprehension
Cooper Cooper
>German education
It's 101% if you added it together, and the statement means 11% of the 90% ahmed.
Anthony Wood
Yes. How often do you think someone goes through the trouble of voting during the primaries, has their desired candidate win the nomination, and then proceeds to not vote for their candidate in the generals? Fucking think before posting next time.
Jayden Morris
>voting in a primary is one of the highest indicators of voting in the general
That doesn't turn one data point into multiple data points.
Lincoln Anderson
>90% + 11% = 111%
This adds up
Brody Bennett
>one data point
There are numerous historical data points that suggest people who vote during the primaries much more reliably vote during the general election.
Charles Collins
Oh my god lol you retard
Robert Campbell
Since when did 90 plus 11 equal 100?
Angel Carter
>What in the world is sarcasm, and where has it gone?
Elijah Phillips
>argentine nigger
Isn't that an oxymoron?
Christopher Young
I really hope you're just being wrong ironically. 11% of 90% is 9.9% of the original population.
Daniel Adams
It's 11% of the 90%, the 90% being reliable voters (Having voted in the primaries) and 11% of those people haven't voted before, new voters.
Hope this helps b0ng.
Ryan Perry
The article doesn't say that the 11% is a part of the 90%.
In fact, the study doesn't use the term "reliable" at all.
stirista.com
Nicholas Martinez
>Argentina
>100% Hispanic
Literally not white according to the US census
Chase Roberts
>11% of 90% is 9.9%
I can see where I went wrong, but I'm not sure what happened with you, sorry.
100/90 = 90% = 1.11
11% of 1.11 = 1.11/11 = 0.1
Kevin Phillips
Jesus fucking Christ. The 90% and the 11% are different groups. They aren't mutually exclusive.
>45% of all pens have blue ink
>90% of all pens are made of plastic
>ZOMG THAT'S 135% YOU GUISE ARE DUMB
The dumb fucking study doesn't even say 90% of Trump voters are reliable. This is the most retarded thread I've ever witnessed.
Jayden Moore
>The 90% and the 11% are different groups.
Don't you mean the same group? The 11 is derived from the 90. Anyway, I already knew that, but how the fuck did the other guy get 9.9%?
Kevin Gonzalez
>Don't you mean the same group? The 11 is derived from the 90.
No, I mean different groups, because the 11% is NOT derived from the 90%.
Charles Moore
The 11% is not part of the 90%?
So 11 + 90 = wtf?
I'm confused. Are you saying that the two are not related, that there is item A and item B, fire and water, eggs and rice?
Did OP make a typo? Shit. I might go to bed soon.
Nicholas Myers
>Did OP make a typo?
Yes. The article states that 90% of Trump's Twitter followers are reliable voters and 11% are first-time voters. It does NOT say that 11% of the 90% of reliable voters are first-time voters.
In any case it would imply that at least 1% of Trump's Twitter followers are both reliable and first-time voters, which is nonsensical.
Of course, big surprise, journalists can't read. The study never uses the term "reliable" and in fact the stat that I assume they used to come up with the 90% states the opposite. It says:
>50.44% are regular voters
>38.53% are irregular voters
>11.03% are new voters
These are mutually exclusive categories, so it adds up to 100%. But how are irregular voters "reliable" voters?
Kayden Sanchez
bump