this actually makes a really good point...
its pretty hypocritical of us to want to build a wall to stop Mexicans from invading our land when we did the same thing by invading the southwest
can anybody prove me wrong or are retards on here just going to ignore this and call me a reddiit shill?
Other urls found in this thread:
>1 post by this ID
>1 post by this ID
/thread
reddit shill detected.
This is why Mexicans should have built a wall. Too bad they were too lazy. Now this is our land by right of conquest.
Nobody can prove you wrong because you haven't proved anything.
Didn't Mexico practically invite Americans to move to Texas because it was barren and they wanted the land to be populated so they can start making money off it?
> right of conquest
and this is how I can tell you are autistic. humans are not animals and humanity is more than just darwinism and survival of the fittest
humans have morals and ethics and complex emotions which separates us from animals
It's not hypocritical at all to build a wall
The Mexican people have forced our hand to build it. Your history reason is so weak bruh
A FUCKING SHILL AGAIN!
SAGE AND REPORT
JAN CHRISTIAAN SMUTS DESPISES RAIDING SHILLS
Morals and ethics are literally a weakness when it comes to others outside of the tribe, though.
See: the corruption of my country by Islam.
Those Mexicans were Spanish immigrants.
Exactly humans are not animals, all humans. Why not open up the traffic the other way, offer some assistance to the Americans coming to enrich the Mexican country, we will not speak their language and not pay taxes if that's Better? We could be really good doctors engineers civic leaders of you pay for translators for us
Most blatant slide thread I've seen today
>It's not hypocritical at all to build a wall
I agree, Mexico should have built a wall first to keep the Americans out, but they didn't.
The rule of nature is, whoever builds the Wall first, wins.
Saged.
Gosh that's so embarrassing we better give them money and let them overrun us so we can be good people again
nah, texas was never mexico no matter what revisionists spout
This one post thing is the stupidest shit. Ever heard of a dynamic IP?
People who believe this probably also believe everyone is actually posting from the country that their flag is from.
C'mon, Sup Forumsacks. You're better than this.
>Humans are immune to Darwinian selection, a motherfucking LAW OF NATURE, because I say they are
How about fuck you instead? You can't just declare your tribal group immune to selective population pressures by fiat. That kind of "Our ideology is absolute and our reign eternal" thinking is suicidal and will end western civilization.
I want cheap beach front property where I can open a cock fighting areana! Vivá all in English though. Play creed really loud, serve microbrews & sliders.
Call it
> BROS!
This whole Jewish Israel bullshit and their right to land they made up in their retard heads based on some past that never happened is what caused illogical thinking. Times were different in past, nowadays we have laws, looking at past is retarded argument. The land is American and illegals ain't even legal.
We've had this thread one million times. Get some new rhetoric.
It's not hypocritical at all. It's called being a rational human being.
If you invaded someone why would you not seek to prevent others from invading you?
Is horsey saying the Mexicans were right? The Mexicans ended up losing Texas after all.
1 Dick for this ID
I guess Mexicans shouldn't have let Texans outnumber them
>human's aren't territorial, they're marxist
Marxism was discredited years ago, even ants understand property rights.
>its pretty hypocritical
No, it's smart. The Mexican Texas lesson demonstrates the dangers of and insecure border and wild uncontrolled immigration. We should learn from their example so that the same thing doesn't happen to us.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it, after all.
>ants
Hyperbole or real? If real, link pls.
god you people are fucking idiots
Fuck your mother.
Fucking thirty posts in and nobody has responded with the only correct post. You faggots. AHEM:
>Horsey
>1 post by this ID
>1 Dick for this ID
Nah, man. Let that die.
The only acceptable cartoonist remains A. Wyatt Mann. Fuck Ben. Fuck Horsey.
Marxism isn't what you think it is and ants conquer each other, so you pretty much gone full retard. Before Marxism kings owned everything, all population, mountains, sea and all the housing.
They did build a wall on the south of their border.
That's the point. Horsey is a faggot. Anybody who unironically posts Horsey has their opinions immediately trashed. Hence,
>Horsey
>when liberals make your point for you
I have a soft spot for Ben. He took a real internet lashing and still landed on his feet. Plus he's not all that bad of a cartoonist.
Zizek pls go, and stay go.
What point are you trying to make?
Are you suggesting, as the comic is, that invading someones culture/land is bad? If so, why DON'T you support the wall? Are you not an American? Do you want to see what happened to the Mexicans happen to us? That comic suggests that the Mexicans did not have a safe border, thus got defeated and their culture was lost. They fucked up according to that comic. Why do you want to the same fate for America?
Explain your actual point?
He's a thief. Stole three cartoons from Mann. Prior to that, no one gave him any shit. Then he tried to shut it down with copyright and libel claims... really unforgivable for a self-proclaimed libertarian.
Fuck Ben.
>europeans immigrate to America
>systemic extermination of the native people
>"nah guys, unrestricted immigration is a great idea!"
Ants have a queen, bees have a queen, so it's pretty much like a British Empire queen or Tsar. In early history people conquer each other like kings, queens, tsars, ants. Then when Communist revolution came, people got rights to property, they become more than just property of tsar aka king. If anything Marxism made it possible for property rights to exist.
>picture related before individual property rights under monarchy
Pretty cool. Not sure it means they understand property rights as much as they understand pillage.
Marx does suck though.
You have a king, too....as well as a god.
It's the state.
Instead of a boring, ho hum bureaucracy, it's treated as an all knowing power.
>humans are not animals
highschool dropout spotted
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS NOT A JOKE!!!! CARRY ON READING OR U WILL DIE EVEN IF YOU LOOKED AT THE WORD WARNING!!!!!!!!1
ONCE THERE WAS A LITTLE GIRL CALLED CLARISSA, SHE WAS 10 YEARS OLD AND SHE LIVED IN A MENTAL HOSPITAL, BEACUSE SHE KILLED HER MUM AND DAD.
SHE GOT SO BAD SHE STARTED TO KILL ALL THE STAFF IN THE HOSPITAL SO THE GOVERMENT DECIDED THAT THE BEST IDEA WAS TO GET RID OF HER SO THEY SET UP A SPECIAL ROOM TO KILL HER, AS HUMANE AS POSSIBLE BUT IT WENT RONG THE MACHINE THEY WERE USEING WENT WRONG. AND SHE WAS SAT THERE IN AGONY FOR HOURS UNTILL SHE FINALLY DIED.
NOW EVERY WEEK ON THE DAY OF HER DEATH SHE RETURNS TO THE PERSON THAT READS THIS LETTER, ON A MONDAY NIGHT AT 12:00 SHE KREEPS INTO YOUR ROOM AND KILLS YOU, BUT SLOWLY AND PAINFULLY SLOWLY CUTTING DIFFRENT PARTS OF UR BODY THEN WATCHES YOU BLEED TO DEATH IF YOU DONT SEND THIS TO 20 PEOPLE BY MIDNIGHT SHELL BE COMEING TO KILL YOU! SEND IT SO SHE HAS ANOTHER LOAD OF PEOPLE TO GET AND FORGETS ABOUT YOU DONT BELVE ME HEY?
EXAMPLE 1: JENNY DIDNT BELIVE THIS AND DELETED IT WITHOUT EVEN READING THE WHOLE THING! A FEW DAYS LATER ON THE MONDAY NIGHT SHE WAS WOKEN UP BYE LOUDE FOOTSTEPS AND HEAVY BREETHING THERE WAS CLARISSA STANDING THERE WITH A HUGE KNIFE AND WELL JENNY IS HISTORY NOW.
EXAMPLE 2: TOM ONLY SENT IT TO 5 PEOPLE CUZ HE THOUGHT HED BE SAFE AND IT WAS PROBLY JUST A JOKE BUT OH HOW RONG WAS HE! HE DIED THE NEXT NIGHT ON MONDAY AND ILL TELL YA NOW IT WASNT PRETTY(JUST CUZ HE SENT FIVE HE DIDNT COMPLETE THE TASK)
EXAMPLE 3: JOEANNA SENT IT TO 19 PEOPLE SHE THOUGHT IT WAS CLOSE ENOUGH AND WOULD DO BUT SHE WAS WRONG SHE DIED THAT NIGHT ON A MONDAY AND ONCE AGAIN
Kings still exist, but their knights aren't allow to come in middle at night and rape your wife and burn your house to the ground. Maybe Jewish kings(monarchies of Europe) and Muslims(sultans) would like to go back to those times. Lets not forget how Israel claimed to rights in Israel, because certain British and UN retarded Christian shit called upon fairy tales of kings and claimed that Jews deserve land. You know who also made such claims? Every sultan, king, genghis khan, emperor, tsar, they all though they are god's will. But then Socialism came and took property of monarchies away and gave it to people, it's really that simple.
>Marx invented property rights.
Everyone owns a small piece of everyone else but no one owns himself.
Real pioneer there.
Americans were literally invited to texas by the Spanish because their own people couldn't hack it against the comanche. The fact that Spain lost control of Mexico, at a later point, does not change this.
The rest of the southwest was won during the Mexican War, which they started.
But most importantly, they weren't even fucking using any of that land. They literally COULDN'T even survive there.
They lost the war, the land is ours. Get over it.
>american education
It's almost true you pedantic twat. The only thing he got wrong was that Mexico didn't exist when American immigration into the territory was granted; it was the spanish who allowed it
Mexico started the war
Mexico lost
Mexico can fuck right off.
Wow, retarded logic of capitalist teachings with backgrounds in Jewish monarchy aka Muslim monarchy that is buying USA and filling your heads with shit. Is this why you have so many credits on houses and don't own your industry? Is this why you import so many Mexicans to fuck you up? Yes, Socialism literally invented property rights. Everybody owned a house very easily during Socialism + vineyards and weekend houses, then came EU and American free trade capitalism and now suddenly you have to work for decade(s) to buy all that and rent/credit everything. People influenced the laws during Socialism, they elected people that represented their industry, this is why it's called that people owned everything, since Communistic leaders had to create laws that suit people.
The reason you have to take out credit on houses in america and western europe is because they are a thousand times more elaborate, large, safe, and accommodating than the shack you call home.
Those mexicans are the descendants of spanish inquisitors. Someone before them alredy conquered a native land.
It's depicted that way because it seems wrong and easier to empathize with a civilized society but the thing is that the original habitants of those lands were primitive tribes that didn't "own" the land as much as the flora and fauna did.
What the fuck? Marx didn't invent property rights. he wanted to abolish them.
Whatever. The point is that industry during capitalism is owned by few billionaires who can't be told by people or government to work for country & people, since they work for themselves and profit, they are little kings. While during Socialism you influenced the industry where you were employed and everybody got paid based on work he actually done, not what little kings think.
And WW1 & WW2 wasn't there to remove monarchy, it was because we wanted to burn Jews for nothing. Keep dreaming.
Tejano's were pissed at the Mexican government too. They even fought in the Texan revolution and the Mexican American war.
Centralizing power into an institution is the opposite of distributing it.
...
d
decentralization(Socialism):
People shaping laws in their industry. Get educated at work. Government can pull the plug on corruption. Strict borders and definition of cultures. No foreigners allowed to buy industry. A central financial institution controls all financial transactions, which are public.
centralization(capitalism):
Billionaires own industry (centralization of industry). Get educated before work, going to universities before you even work (centralization of education). Government can't pull the plug on corruption since they are part of corruption (centralization of power aka everybody knows each other). No borders (come people, we don't care). No definition of cultures (centralization of all races aka integration). Foreigners can buy land and industry (centralization of ownership, not even needed to be inside of country). A central federal reserve that is clouded in mystery and central bank is private and private owned by we don't know who (centralization of power and corruption).
This argument really triggers me. The same when Indians use it too. Yes, I understand my ancestors took the land you were living on. That's the way it works. Survival of the fittest. Your people were not up able to keep it because you were lesser than my ancestors. Furthermore, you act like your shitty people didn't take the land from some other fuck at some point. Your people didn't just suddenly appear and live there for millions of years. No, you took it from whoever or whatever was there. Like we did to you later on. Fuck I'm triggered.
You had a war over American migrants moving into Mexico and Mexico ended up losing that war and huge amounts of land.
With historical context this political cartoon is a stark warning against mexican immigration to the US.
War is coming.
The problem with these comparisons is that those invading the West aren't doing it militarily, they're using our cuck politicians against us. If Mexicans were conquoring territory through forced I'd be much more okay with them
Okay, so when are the Mexicans going to leave Aztec land?
You do realize that the vast majority of the Mexican peasant population are the actual natives, and the upper class are all Spanish mulattos, right?
So when are you leaving?
We won, they lost.