Am I the only one who is not interested in this at all?
I find the film idea bland and boring.
Blame my school teachers for never teaching me anything about "Dunkirk" I suppose.
youtube.com
I want more WW2 movies like Das Boot. We already have seen so many movies on the Americans, English side. We already know about the "horrors of war" which Gibson perfectly showed in his Hacksaw Ridge. We need more unique WW2 movies.
Other urls found in this thread:
No, it looks like shit. Quite possibly the least exciting looking war movie I've ever seen.
>Blame my school teachers for never teaching me anything about "Dunkirk" I suppose.
No, I'll blame you faggot.
No, I second you. And, as you mention with Das Boot, there's no way this movie will ever compare to classics like that and others (Apocalypse Now, say).
I'd rather him go with original (if flawed) stuff than see this.
Well thank God I am not the only one who feels exactly the same.
I watched the leaked first 5 minutes of the film which was posted in a thread few days ago and I wasn't hyped at all.
What is Dunkirk anyway? The English had to retreat away or something? Wow a big WW2 historical event ay...
I have no idea what the plot is supposed to be from the trailer, but it looks weird. It gives off a vibe like the characters are already dead or some shit. Has a similar feel to it as Inception for some reason
>we need more ww2
No, we already went through that phase of war movies
I'm not interested because Nolan is both a shit writer and director.
Why can't we get more movies on the German side?
I am not talking about just watching serial killers killing (which gets boring in itself) but more interesting films like Das Boot because more of those definitely need to be made than stuff like this which we have seen so many times over and over and watched so many documentaries about the events of WW2.
>Using teen bait singers to attract attention
that's a new low for him
>I'm not interested because Nolan is both a shit writer and director.
I liked his Interstellar.
I think the reason that I did was because I went to see the movie for free in my local cinema and I had no idea Nolan directed it. All I knew was some movie called Interstellar and I was dragged along.
Hell I had no idea it was a sci fi movie at all!
One of the most interesting surprises I've ever had in the cinema as I watched it knowing 100% NOTHING about it, thinking it was about some guy living on a farm until I heard it was about some black hole thing and then when the plot twist happened, I was so amazed.
I disliked the exposition, found the visuals to be lackluster except for a few parts, some of the worst dialogue I'd experienced that year, and the worst last thirty minutes of any movie in recent memory.
How else are they going to get young girls to watch a WW2 movie?
>historyfag here
Hitler trolled them into thinking he'd invade France via Belgium. He attacked through the Ardennes and cut off the BEF and some Frogs. Long story short, a bunch of little ships and the Royal Navy evacuated ~350k soldiers.
Some soldiers held the Germans off, though it's also likely that Hitler called off the all-out assault in the hope that Britain would capitulate. Had this not happened, Britain was probably fucked.
Sick of another Hollywood WW2 movie
>nazi were bad
>British/west contributed a lot guys for realz
Like I said: I went into the theater knowing nothing about the movie at all so that's probably why my experience seeing it was very different compared to others who saw it.
>>British/west contributed a lot guys for realz
Even my polish grandmother got pissed when people consider Americans a hero of WW2. They didn't help to lift a finger until near the end of the war.
I'm more interested in watching Denial.
Can't find it in any local cinema nor online to watch
Fuck off, the American were in the war from the start. Poland were nothing but bootlicking coward cucks who let the Jews die.
>Fuck off, the American were in the war from the start.
nice joke Murica
In the mean time, the Russians invaded my Polish grandparents' house, almost took them away because they were pretty wealthy people.
Americans didn't give a shit at all to help
Wtf i love poland now.
Wondered what the angle was for a while (it's a movie about a defeat after all) and the trailer spilled it.
>young soldier: "I'm not going back [to the beaches]"
>old man: "There's no hiding from this son"
>old man: "We have a job to do"
We're going back to the Greatest Generation in order to tell millennials to get in line and stop complaining, because that's what the Greatest Generation did to succeed.
Trite, but should provide material to shitpost with. Maybe we'll get a Banepost out of it.
>if I take that lifejacket off, will you drown?
>ablububbubuhblub
his only bad movie is the the dark knight rises though
Trailer looked pretty poor.
Here's the thing: Nolan is terrible at creating characters people give a shit about, and that is the whole point of Dunkirk.
>I want more WW2 movies like Das Boot.
>We need more unique WW2 movies.
So you conceive unique to be exactly like a previously made film?
>BUT YOUNG KIDS ARE DYING. WE GOTTA CRY FOR THEM
I'm more interested in this than his usual movies. I always saw Nolan as a fairly bland filmmaker, typically British. Even the fact that he directs in suits and is always calm and diplomatic in interviews reflects this, you couldn't imagine him going batshit like Coppola on the Apocalypse Now shoot. War is not clean, war is pure madness and horror, Nolan cannot depict the spirit of war. He reminds me of those 60's guys who directed Bond movies or all those kinda generic but also charming and comfy WW2 movies. This is exactly what Dunkirk looks like, Battle of the Bulge type of bland WW2 film. Completely forgettable and inoffensive but well-crafted and elegant filmmaking, only fooled plebs with his use of storytelling gimmicks. This is all I see from Nolan, he's completely unable to make films with a real soul, grit or subversive spirit. I doubt we'll ever get war movies like Cross of Iron or Das Boot again, because filmmakers like these don't exist anymore.
>What is Hacksaw Ridge
Gibson gave us the perfect WW2 movie already.
Dunkirk doesnt need to be made
DOES ANYBODY HAVE VIDEO OF THE 7 MIN PROLOGUE? !!
>Inception
>good
You need to go back./
>Blame my school teachers for never teaching me anything about "Dunkirk" I suppose.
you never learned about dunkirk?
WATCH IT
Everyone wanted the Jews to die. Hitler only got in trouble by invading other countries.
Back to 2010, when the majority of Sup Forums liked it.
Knowing basic tier history doesn't mean you can just go about calling yourself a history fag. The prevailing reason Hitler pulled the panzer divisìons back was from fear of the royal navy who would have decimated the German armour
> Interstellar
> lacklustre visuals
2/10
No we didn't.
>we
That was the frog who actually kept back the german away during days while the brits were fleeing back to their island.
Brits barely fought during the Battle of France, belgians lost more men than them.
But hey it's now casual with anglo revisionnism to wash away France from its own history, can't wait for the new Napoleon movie where he leads irish and pole soldiers then is stopped by a bunch of english fighting 1v2 in Waterloo.
>this is what the Frogs actually believe
you probably also believe the French Resistance was real
The french get a bad rap here in the states, to the point where they're portrayed as cowards. This is the popular consensus
I imagine it's the same in the UK by the looks of this new movie
I don't see why that is, they've always fought. They might not have always won but they've showed tremendous courage throughout their history
It's a shame desu
>Nolan
>WW2
>Hoyte van Hoytema
It'll be entertaining and look good. Stop trying to look sophisticated on a somalian horticulture imageboard.
>Yet another WWII movie
>muh six millions
>waaaah nazi were badies and allies were heroes
no, thanks, I'm fed up with this stuff already.
Another movie where the good guys lose? No thanks.
Their soldiers were okay but the commanders were shit tier scaredy cats.
Primarily due to Hollywood being a Semitic creation, which they have a monopoly over.
It would have to be an independent film, which could benefit it.
I do agree though, a difference in perspective would be interesting.
Over 100K French soldiers were evacuated as well as British ones if I recall.
Not even a frog, just a swiss guy liking history.
But you are probably a bong thinking you were better than the french during WW2, some of you even think you were hotshit while the only thing that saved you ass was a bit of water.
The only achievement of Britain during WW2 was to not be a peninsula, otherwise the german would have curbstomped you in 2 weeks.
Not surprised about this movie though, only anglo could make a movie about them "bravely" fleeing the battlefield and leaving their allies alone.
The movie isn't even out and you're making a lot of assumptions. Trailers are made separate from the directors influence and they probably kept it all Anglo as a marketing thing.
There's probably a lot of French stuff in there. Almost as many French soldiers were evacuated as British.
Dopey millennials. You're stupid that you're unfit to discuss a Christopher Nolan flick.
>waaahhhhh why din mor brits throw their lives away for france its ssnot faaaiirrr
Most of them had to come back immediatly in Brittany and Normandy, the french continued to fight on their own during 3-4 weeks (evacuation of Dunkirk began during the 27 May and France surrendered the 22 June).
They would have preferred to launch a counter attack instead of evacuating but the brits had already taken the decision to move back on the other side of the Channel, wihout british troops they had not chance to create successful offensive so they complied.
>It's an 'user who is most likely not older than 30 calls others millennials' episode
Why don't Germans make more war movies? Oh yeah, they lost. Also they don't have as much money to throw at film production as American studios do. Damn, must suck being a shit country.
>movie is titled Interstellar
>Hell I had no idea it was a sci fi movie at all!
Thank you to demonstrate us how anglo rationnalize their constant backstabbing of everyone in Europe from Denmark to Spain and Russia.
Is it a reboot of the 58 movie? A new adaptation of the two novels the 58 movie is based on? An original screenplay?
Under Sandet/Unter dem Sand is pretty good if you want a recent movie from a German perspective.
It's basically about some young German soldiers being forced to clear landmines from the west coast of Denmark after the war, while everyone treats them like animals.
at least we agree on you being totaly useless in this part of the war
Is this new Star Trek?
>Attempting to follow Gibson's warkino with this load of shit
Dead on arrival, not even going to pirate it
>Am I the only one who is not interested in this at all?
nah
I fucking hate you more than any word in the English language can describe.
>there are actually people who don't know about the little ships of Dunkirk
i didn't do any history in school after age 13 and even i know this, wtf
Love,user,Love