Not so happy considering it's one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Connor Foster
who knew the BBC board was filled with such cucks?
Christopher Murphy
This is the best pasta on Sup Forums imho
Caleb Collins
>Listening to Philosophers Stone audio-book >All that comfy establishment >All that Slytherin Tsundering >Well done, Well done, HOWEVER
Merry Christmas Sup Forums
Colton Torres
There's nothing more pathetic than autistically making one of dullest shitposts in the history of Sup Forums shitposts. Each shitpost following /lit/ NEETs and their pals from /r9k/ as they fight assorted kinographers has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the lack of film analysis the shitpost's only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of images and pasta to make fantasy unfantastical, to make witchcraft seem plebeian.
Perhaps the die was cast when Quentin vetoed the idea of shitposting on /lit/. Posting the pasta on Sup Forums, he made sure it would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his (You)s. The shitpost might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-intellectual in its refusal of critique and watching for the plot. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the shitposts are f-funny though "No!"
The writing is dreadful; the main text is terrible and the troll jpg isn't much better. As I read, I noticed that every time he shitposts, Quentin writes that "Atlas Shrugged is a God-tier form of art."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that shitpost was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several hundred thousand times. I was incredulous. The shitposter's mind is so governed by spamming and repetition that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of the shitpost by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of: "If these kids are shitposting at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you shitpost you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Wyatt Nelson
superior pasta
Robert Bennett
>Philosopher's Stone >Philosopher's
Hunter Torres
it triggers tumblr and reddit potter tourists so its good, but the meeting X at store is still the best one to come out of this board or the heat legend one
Jaxon Young
Except you fail in thinking that reddit isnt Sup Forums and reddit cant hate harry potter
>but the meeting X at store is still the best one to come out of this board >he thinks that came from Sup Forums
Hello, newfag.
Aaron Ortiz
You're welcome
Wyatt James
>You will never be this comfy with a group of friends
Isaiah Perez
>that pic don't sexualize her user
Jayden Watson
It always was happy, considering it's one of the best franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been distinguishable from the others. Aside from the fantastic imagery, the series’ numerous consistencies have been its lack of plot holes and effective use of special effects, all to make magic magical, to make action seem captivating.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would be a work of art that meant a lot to everybody! Just incredible cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Lucas (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-prequel series in its refusal of annoying characters, boring dialogue and dull plot. We love to face that fact. Now, thankfully, we always can.
>a-and the books were good! "Yes!" The writing is intricate; the books were amazing. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote, instead, that the character "stretched his legs" or some other fantastic idiom.
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by unique imagery and fresh metaphors that she has so many styles of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Adam Rivera
...
Brody Myers
meant for And my bad user
Landon White
...
Logan Brown
...
Camden Barnes
roll
Eli Harris
Rollan for 2
Colton Hughes
6 please.
Benjamin Rivera
roll
Leo Martinez
...
Matthew Hernandez
Anya
Owen Ward
...
Josiah Ross
Just watched the whole series for the first time, loved it. Snapes memories were really emotional, too bad potters reaction after knowing the truth was shit, daniel radcliffe is a bad actor
Brayden Baker
radcliffe was genuinely pretty good in ootp and he will tell you thats what he thinks was his best film but he had some alcohol issues and a little complex for a few years after than and he was not only drunk on hbp but they took a break filming deathly hallows because it was affecting his acting. apparently emma was actually supportive and rupert kind of didnt care
Ethan Barnes
Lmao how old was he when he had alcohol problems.. and he was ok in OOTP, but in all the others he was pretty bad
Jack Torres
He was like 19-21 or older
Caleb Bennett
Also its pretty cool to hear of someone watching it for the first time glad, you loved it, and yea Harry was carried by everyone especially Ron and Hermione. Not all Dans fault as Harry's character is pretty restricted to virtually nothing but he was pretty bad
Jason Collins
Watched the first 2 when I was a kid, don't know why I didn't watch the rest. Marathoned the whole series and loved it, really comfy especially around christmas.
