>Jews belong to a worldwide globalist financial elite and work everyday to destroy western civilization
>Jews belong to a worldwide communist conspiracy and work everyday to destroy westen civilization
So wich one is it?
>Jews belong to a worldwide globalist financial elite and work everyday to destroy western civilization
>Jews belong to a worldwide communist conspiracy and work everyday to destroy westen civilization
So wich one is it?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
haaretz.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
what are jews to do with these ?
Both.
Check the leaders of the communist revolution in russia. Then, check the names of the bankers.
Both. The jew is a sentient parasite. It seeks only the next drink of blood, it doesn't care what or who it needs to pretend to be to get it.
It's both. Look up whom Marx is related to.
What flag is this?
t. Alberto Barbosa
t. Kahn Souphanousinphone
Laos
Both, Mr. Alberto
They've never been communists. They were socialists. They intentionally centralized all wealth and power to themselves. Communism is self-governing and they don't want that
>dat incest
both are the same thing
R A R E
A
R
E
Why must it be just one of the two and not both? It should be fairly evident from Israel's politics and Jewish people's reactions to western civilization's politics that they call for one thing for themselves and another for everyone else.
...
let's investigate
COMMUNISM:
created homogeneous nation states? check
no free travel, unabated immigration? check
discouraged sexualization advertising and homosexuality? check
discouraged degeneracy? check
countries who were communist are most based today? check
jews left in huge numbers because no profit to be made. check
capitalism causes progressivism, allows for progressive ideas... check em
So, are you Chinese or Japanese?
i am not one of those
rage
seported
1 post
shill
Communism:
Jewish led uprisings that slaughtered millions of Christians and siphoned the wealth out of White Christian nations: check
Created by a jew: check
Bolshevik revolution was financed by top "capitalist" Jew bankers
You twit
Globalism and communism have the same goal anyway, one world goverment with no nations or religion
>muh shills
I am here don't worry.
But oh boy, you guys sure are quick to answer to this threads
You forgot to mention that all the shitty low level Jews also get wiped out which is Zionist paradise
>Jewish led uprisings that slaughtered millions of Christians and siphoned the wealth out of White Christian nations
Source?
Also
>falling for central european nationalistic regimes in the 30's propaganda
Both are one and the same.
Banking cannot exist in communist societies
Banking doesn't need to exist if the goys have 0 money
Bold accusations, but without any source
Communism is the anthithesis of banking bro
the financial elite benefits from strong central governments and highly regulated economies because they can bribe legislators to get rid of their competition with more laws and regulations.
it makes sense that they'd try to set up a highly planned/centralized economy (such as the ussr) by financing revolutions
>Source?
Do research dumbass. 85% of first soviet goverment were Jews. Funded By internatioanl jewish bankers.
Lenin was a Jew and so was Trotsky. His real name was Bronstein
topkek
Also communism is a moneyless society iirc. Usury is contrary to communism and socialist ideas
I want to keep on but there's no point in arguing with a "communism is not real communism" historic revisionist since you're just going to keep repeating it
Fuck off Alberto
Barent's wife was Lilith
oh, i noticed you're that lefty pol subhuman portunigger. no wonder you're so fucking stupid. money isn't worth anything. you should know this by now. the only goal is power and control. there is no contradiction because the money part is irrelevant
that's what it said in a pamphlet.
Reality was much different
> 85% of first soviet goverment were Jews.
Atheist jews. And they were quickly ousted from power.
> Funded By internatioanl jewish bankers.
Source?
> Funded By internatioanl jewish bankers.
>Vladimir Putin says
sure buddy
You know how they always say communism has never been achieved? There is a reason for that. Much more profitable to keep the goyim poor and change to state capitalist at the top. Just who do you think is at the top or as the left calls it the 1% Take a look at the names.
>Communism is the anthithesis of banking bro
lol no
> 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
It's both. Every accomplished Marxist thinker is a Jew, and it just so happens that the only places Jews have thrived have been bastions of Capitalism (US, England, Germany before Hitler). The places Jews have been most persecuted have all been Socialist (USSR, Nazi Germany). So the better question is how could you be both Jewish and a Marxist? Here's Milton Friedman explaining this paradox.
Khan soupannewsaphone. Bobby does what he wants.
for fuck sakes, Marxs father was a rabi.
Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel…Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi [Arabic, meaning lord or master] and eat,
Look at affects not non sense unprovable so called "goals" of "achieving" something.
youtube.com
Communism is 100% talmudic kosher, it does everything in Talmuds teachings.
And i don't want to argue with someone who can't even acknowledge simple definitions, and prefer to spout memes
>money isn't worth anything
>the only goal is power and control
money is power luv
>Reality was much different
But it literally wasnt communism.
>hands of the state
>state
>in communism
topkek
Thank you for filling the hole on my flag map in Indochina Laosbro.
> if we don't call it a state, then it is not a state
come on now
>Atheist jews.
Jews are an ethnicity. Nothing to do with atheism. And considering how they punished anti-semitism by death but persecuted christians something tells me they weren't 100% anti religion.
Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg, both international Jew bankers financed the communist revolution
Communism is a stateless society bro
Anarchy, if you prefer
Laobro when referring to a person would be more correct
>Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg, both international Jew bankers financed the communist revolution
So? Were they the only ones?
Also source?
>make all goyim nations bow to you
Check
>take away all property of goyim
Check
>a goyims life is worth nothing
Check
>if a Jew hits a Goy he is not to be punished but if a Goy Hits a Jew he's to be executed
Check
In answer to your inquiry :
National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.
Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.
In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.
J. Stalin
January 12, 1931
First published in the newspaper Pravda, No. 329, November 30, 1936
>a Jew is not to eat with a non Jew
Check, politiboru
Then who's gonna run the gulags ?
>Jews are the worldwide globalist financial elite conducting the worldwide communist conspiracy
What's so hard to understand?
A georgian
Because Communism is directly against bankers interests
How is laborers living in a non stable financial state with their labor being valued to the whims of the Communism makers?
If there is no state to force me to work then why do i have to work?
ask a communist
...
E como ficou aquela cena da mão do jogador peruano?
I'm not a fan of monkeyball
>Communism is a stateless society bro
that is an oxymoron and you are aware of that
whatever judiciary organism that legislates things as simple as which one is the correct way of the road IS the government
I have no problem with free and proud soviet nighborhoods deciding their destiny, but this is not the case, it is an aggressive conquest of people.
youtube.com
I am personally a big fan of the "soviets" (council) system of local neighborhoods uniting and working in their interests, I am not interested in a large state separated from the people which rules them.
Então é um intelectual braileiro, ok.
HEre, read the definition if you don't believe me
en.wikipedia.org
>inb4 definition is wrong!!!!! Sup Forums memes are right!!!
What it says is irrelevant look at how it's possible to achieve and you will see the true nature of that doctrine.
...
That the definition contains an oxymoron does not imply that the oxymoron is not there
>Communism is 100% talmudic kosher, it does everything in Talmuds teachings.
holy kek
>Khan soupannewsaphone
Souphanousinphone
>how it's possible to achieve and you will see the true nature of that doctrine.
Go discuss it with a communist. I personally don't care
>literally arguing that defenitions are wrong and his memetic education is right
...
Who said that the definition is wrong?
A definition can be correct, it does not imply it does not contain a contradiction
I can define a "gluruplurus" as an elephant that is both large and small
If someone asked you for the definition of "gluruplurus" you would be CORRECT in answer: "an elephant that is both large and small"
Yet the oxymoron would remain there
One central government bank still must exist to distribute the shekles, and it's much stronger than any private bank
Sure mate. What makes you think communism cannot be a stateless society?
the world doesnt revolve around you
reported
...
Okay, so are you Chinese or Japanese?
>announcing reports
that the definition contains an oxymoron
it defines a system of government based around common ownership of production while declaring that itself not a system of government just so Marx could win a few brownie points with the anarchists of 1848
it is a definition that only the mentally crippled could take seriously, and that actual anarchists like Bakunin laughed at
> They [the Marxists] maintain that only a dictatorship—their dictatorship, of course—can create the will of the people, while our answer to this is: No dictatorship can have any other aim but that of self-perpetuation, and it can beget only slavery in the people tolerating it; freedom can be created only by freedom, that is, by a universal rebellion on the part of the people and free organization of the toiling masses from the bottom up —Mikhail Bakunin
both
In the past, was both.
Today is the first.
Again take those concerns to actual communist people.
How? One is the antithesis of the other.
Why? You are the one saying that Jews can't be both a rich elite and want to create communistic world
I am pointing out that can entirely be the case insofar communism is actually a form of dictatorship
>Which one allows for unabated abuse and control under the guises of freedom and inclusivity?
Both mate.
I don't understand why people are so averse to the Marxist critique. Where do you think unions, minimum wages, paid sick leave, annual leave, the 8 hour working day, a social wage come from? They come from organized systems of critique -- such as Marxism. It has played a fairly important role in changing capitalism for the better.
Capitalism was never about the peasantry. It was about the lords and merchants being able to control their own capital independent of the crown. Capitalism seems more Jewish to me than Communism. Not to say I agree with communism, but Marxism as has a definite utility in critiquing capitalism.
It was Karl Marx that said "What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money."
and
"An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society."
Not from Marx.