Is Radiohead prog?

...

No? They are pop-rock.

No.

yes

Maybe

I don't know.

can you repeat the question

Paranoid Android and Bloom are the only songs by them I'd call prog.

If they are, they weren't intentionally trying to be.
>Determined to form his own conclusions, Greenwood listened to the likes of Genesis, King Crimson and Pink Floyd, "though I didn't even bother with Yes, seeing as how they were met with so much derision. It *is* all awful and terrible," Greenwood says, his brown eyes widening. "I found the one good Pink Floyd album, 'Meddle,' which is amazing, though that's supposedly the one that made Johnny Lydon say he hated them. I came out after listening to all these terrible Genesis records with the realizations that the Mellotron is a great instrument, and that you should never have a song with 'unicorn' in the title. So a few lessons were learned."

No. They're Alternative Rock, Art Rock, Experimental Rock and Electronic.

based

So the only Radiohead song I ever listened to was Creep on the radio, but I decided that the first time I ever listen to anything else by them would have to be on vinyl. I found these two at a record store and was mostly pleased by them. Which album should I go for next?

In Rainbows, Kid A then do HTTT, Amnesiac, King of Limbs

Either kid A, or hail to the thief

They are beyond the definition of prog.

Okay, I think that answer is very
simple: bands like the Mars Volta, Tool, and Radiohead - these bands
are the future of progressive music.

Bands like the Flower Kings and Transatlantic? The DEATH of
progressive music. These are the bands that reinforce every prejudice
people have about progressive rock: old-fashioned, pompous,
pretentious, hung-up on sci-fi concepts - that for me is rubbish. But
there's a new wave of bands that for me are being influenced just as
much by hip-hop as they are King Crimson or Godspeed You Black
Emperor and bands like us as well, I hope.

For me, Transatlantic and the Flower Kings - and I have heard these
bands, unfortunately - they're following the blueprint from 1972 so
closely; it's completely pointless and redundant. They're never going
to better the originals, anyway - why bother? Whatever's going around
should be part of their musical vocabulary.

I don't particularly dig generic music, whether it's hardcore metal
or hip-hop, even down to the prog bands you mentioned. They're
following a formula way too closely. For me,being progressive is
about taking the word at face value: it a band is going to try to be
progressive, they shouldn't be looking at the past - they should be
looking at everything that's going on around them now,
from hip-hop to trip-hop to death metal to trance. The
word 'progressive' is about the FUTURE."

lol'd

They are pop-rock and incorporate some gimmicks from these genres.
Not like most pop isn't electronic since the late 70s.

no
no
yes
kid a definetly, then amnesiac, then in rainbows

Going off this, I'll get Kid A, then In Rainbows, then HTTT, Amnesiac, King of Limbs.

Definitely.