/éire/

>Then why didn't you just say that?
I wanted to know if you were open minded towards the topic before responding to your other points.

not really, but if its under a week of delivery i can probably ask the owner if its okay no problem
already have headphones (plantronics) but they are not very comfortable and have a mic, id really preffer earphones for my phone when im in the bus
i did have some really good sounding sony headphones for 30€ time ago but the build quality was very feeble and they broke one day.
i should have brought earphones in the first place desu.

Saying that a source is potentially biased doesn't mean that I'm close-minded on the issue. So not only was that underhanded, but it was pointless too.

What's your preffered e-buying system?
strawpoll.me/13539325

You were suspicious of the source without even knowing where it came from, that's not open minded. I wanted to confirm it was suspicion.
Not pointless at all, it saved a long exchange with a far right viewpoint which I don't enjoy.

Did you find a place to live yet or still with airbnb?

adverts.ie desu

>You were suspicious of the source without even knowing where it came from, that's not open minded
Being curious about the source of a figure is not close-minded. Do you take every statistic at face value?

i found an airbnb to stay 6 nights but its kinda fishy, i should have went for someone with a profile picture. im afraid i might have to ask for my money back and look for a hotel if it fails.
gonna check it out tomorrow.

I don't think you were curious, I think you were suspicious. You responded to my source within a minute denouncing it immediately as biased so you couldn't have even researched it to find out what it was or if it even existed at all.

It doesn't really lend itself to a fun chit chat about a news story when you're suspected of posting false information to support a bias in the first response.