HAHAHA

No.
I'm just saying that they can both produce and both use talented producers to make their music better or more interesting than it would be if they did everything.
This is enough of a similarity between the two to make the comparison valid despite all the other differences (which of course are gonna be there, since they're two different persons).

I think the tendency to discount Bjork's own input into her own music is way worse. She sounds pretty plausible on it all.
soundonsound.com/techniques/inside-track-bjorks-vulnicura

Tue, but I think people's tendency to discount her input is greatly exaggerated.
Everyone knows she's not some DJ Khaled type of musician (that does nothing more than telling others what to do), and that she deserves credit for what she does, but people not that her music is not entirely her own if she employs other producers.
Saying this doesn't equal to saying that she has no significant input.

Whose music is "all their own"?
We don't talk about Bob Dylan or David Bowie like this.

I'll admit I'm not really sure about those two, but if they hired producers whose input is integral to the music they were making, then their music should also be seen as not entirely theirs.

Where is the rest of that interview?