The ideal Premier League team. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like

The ideal Premier League team. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=t-tVdssbNdQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>no Romero

Can someone give me a kick run down on pacy niggers from 1-5

Wow... so this is the future of England

Ashley Young, Axel Tuanzebe, Timothy Fosu-Mensah, Chris Smalling and Antonio Valencia

It's very diverse, I like it.

>Not knowing who Valencia is

who is right from martial and who is bottom right?

Number 11 knows.

no, this is what peak performance looks like

Eric Bailly, literally scored yesterday.
Cameron Borthwick-Jackson I believe, out on loan at Leeds.

lol i don't get it.

It's up to the white players to be better not bitter. Obviously the managers of both teams feel like the black lads are going to do a better job.

I used to manage an U11 team a couple years ago in London and all the best players were either black or mixed race. If the white players want to progress, they've simply got to do more.

I don't think this really matters anyway.

2 many whyte bois

Smalling and Lingard are clearly not black enough. Get rid of them.

Giroud out
Benzema in

The blacks belong in black land with the rest of the black people

t. pure-blooded abo

>English, English, Dutch, English, Ecuadorian, French, Ivorian, French, English, Belgian, English, English

Not that diverse desu

Nothing I wouldn't expect from a bogan.

>Weakest link is the white guy.

Say it again mate see what happens

Hella diverse.

When was the last time that a team composed mainly of pacy black lads won a major tournament? Either internationally or the CL. Being pacy is a huge advantage at U-17 level but at prolevel it is basically a gimmick

Only spurs are a true white team

Portugal 2016
France runner-up

When have you heard of a team losing because the players were were too fast? If they can play, they can play. If they can play, and are quick, it's a bonus.

>Eurocup
>Major tournament
But pacy negroes have nothing but pace. That is why Brits expected Walcott to be better than Messi due muh pace

It's not just about 'pacy black lads'.

Anyway, Mourinho's Chelsea had a lot of black players as did. Wenger had a few in the early 2000s.

Barca in 2008 had a few too.

You also have to remember that the majority of footballers ARE white so in general, they will dominate major trophies.

btfo

>>Eurocup
>>Major tournament

damage control
you spics literally claim you were the greatest team ever because of 2 eurocups

>If they can play, they can play
the problem is many get chosen because they are faster than the other kids, not because they can play

I guess the idea is you can teach football to a kid but you can't teach speed. But the reality is it doesn't matter what you teach to kids when they are shit pupils

Really gets the noggin' joggin'

>Mourinho's Chelsea had a lot of black players
And they won jack shit outside of England
>Wenger had a few in the early 2000s.
And they won jack shit outside of England
>Barca in 2008 had a few too.
And they were shit period

UK always emphasized the physical aspect of the game over the technical. They are reaping what they've sown. The two latest great white promises that came out of there were Rooney and Bale ffs. Has nothing to do with race, Brits in general aren't technical.

Barca won the Champions league with Abidal, Toure, Eto'o and Henry that was 2008/09

Chelsea won the Champions League in 2012

with Malouda, Bosingwa, Ashley Cole, Essien, Mikel, Drogba, Kalou and Lukaku

so you're wrong

Polish blacks and turks

Walcott was good, and quick as a youngster, but he was expected to develop into a good player.

You don't make it to the top based on just speed.

Now it's just blind racism.

>Boateng, Mustafi and Özil grouped to one side
good
subtle

Only Eto'o was relevant from that lot
>Chelsea won the Champions League in 2012
with Malouda, Bosingwa, Ashley Cole, Essien, Mikel, Drogba, Kalou and Lukaku
That Chelsea side was awful.They fluked the CL.
Your best argument is a fluke CL (Chelsea got stomped the next season in EUrope) and a Barça with niggers that were useless sans Eto'o.
When pacy nogs win tournaments consistently I might take those kind of players seriously.English scouts are just easily impressed morons that believe that pace bullies will remain that against proffesionals.I am still waiting Walcott and Sturridge to become "world class"

Would Hitler approve though? Who would he like here? Is it the pure master race Muller?

Didn't realise Neuer was a manlet

>Has nothing to do with race
while this may be true, one gets the feeling most black players in europe top teams are either
>defensive oriented muscle
>speedy/counter-attack mongs

would be interesting to actually find out the percentage of truth to this by checking each player, but time consuming

and Özil was only there because Reus was kill

>Walcott was good
He was shit.He just had pace
>You don't make it to the top based on just speed.
Walcott,Sturridge,Sterling and all those pacy nigs from England are just pacy.They have 0 technique

>Now it's just blind racism.
>Factz are rasist
No team that has invested on pacy nogs has ever been succesful.

Mertesacker is 6'1, Neuer is 6'0 and the other dudes are all 5'11

True, you just get selected as a kid to go into high level performance training and development

It's like the obese islanders every coach selects for representatives even though they're shit by the time they're 15 and everyone has caught up

Sturridge and Sterling have technique though. You obviously don't watch shit.

>No team that has invested on pacy nogs has ever been succesful.

And teams purely based on pacy whites has been successful?

Why must you group pacy with black all the time. Players like Kante, Makele and Seedorf are not pacy.

>Sturridge and Sterling have technique though
LMAO

Sterling is a top 5 dribbler in the premier league.

Why else would guardiola rate him?

>Sturridge and Sterling have technique though
Kek
>And teams purely based on pacy whites has been successful?
Real Madrid.But white players don't rely just on pace like niggers.They have a higher IQ and have better vision,technique and offball movement.
>Why must you group pacy with black all the time.
There are 2 kind of black players
>Le muscular nig
>Le pacy nig
You can't find me one player that doesn't fall into any of these groups

how old are you?
youtube.com/watch?v=t-tVdssbNdQ

gullit

>sturridge
>pacy
lel what are you on mate

>gullit
>Not le physical lad
The same goes to Rijkaard.Black players have 0 technique and that is why Van Basten was the only good player of the bunch as he was not black and had technique

French academies disregard white players in general because they are less physical and athletic than their black counterparts. Which is why Griezman had to migrate to Spain when he was 12 because no one wanted him in his homeland. And now he's our best player. That also applies to black and arab kids who aren't necessarily the most physical or fastest within their age group.

Marcelo is probably the most technical player in the whole of Real Madrid. You're fucking retarded and conveniently ignoring the existence of Ronaldinho who used to make passes Modric can't even dream of.

>Black players have 0 technique
>what is Brazil

Fucking kek.

Everyone is technical in brazil, to some extent. Their situation is very different from that of England and France. The brazilian approach to the game has nothing to do with ours ( which is shit to begin with ).

>Marcelo is probably the most technical player in the whole of Real Madrid
He is not even top 10 technically.He is black for crying out loud.How is he going to be good technically?
>Ronaldinho
Pacy tircky nigger with 0 substance.At least Eto'o used his pace to score.Ronaldinho was just doing monkey tricks.Modric is way better than Ronaldinho ever was.Stop fouling yourself

ok stop replying to this guy now.

>this is brought to you by 4 years of success out of 100 years of irrelevance, mediocrity and failure

Where is the argument?

Where's yours?

You called Ronaldinho a pacy tricky nigger with 0 substance. I can't discuss football with you.

>Where's yours?
Readmy posts
>You called Ronaldinho a pacy tricky nigger with 0 substance.
What else did he do?

>You don't make it to the top based on just speed.
lmao of course you do, you are clueless if you think you don't

if you are faster than the rest of the kids you'll keep making the cut as long as you can handle a ball good enough. They'll figure out where to play you later

No Griezmann?
No Koscielny?

only 3-4 of those people are quality enough to start regularly on a top 4 epl team

And....only 3-4 of them regularly start for Man Utd anyway so whats your point?

Are spics officially the worst race?

You asked for a team of quick coons that won a major trophy. You've been given loads.

>You've been given loads.
I have yet to get one.

there's no such thing as a black European. You may not like this

last time i checked the ideal team had 11 and the ideal squad has 25.

is there such a thing as a white african?

Are you a white American?

>giroud
france
>mbappe, umtiti
camerun
>lemar
guadalupe
>pogba
guinea
>sidibe, kante, dembele
mali
>varane
martinique
>mendy
senegal
>lloris
spain

yes, it's pretty diverse

>King of the manlets and manlets

Boers and Afrikaners are squatters too.

No eres más tonto porque no se puede.

...

Why don't we force them to play for their home countries again

t.dumb nigger

*dabs*

You have to go back Mohammed

Because all of them minus Umtiti were born in France so it'd be pretty difficult to enforce 2bqh.

you think fifa gives a shit where people are from? they just want the money.
most of our good players are from germany.
diego costa plays for spain. he still lives in brazil.

>blacks
>ever winning

Wasn't euros 2016 and copa American not enough proof that team's mostly blacks can't win?

Que español más imbécil

"Qué" lleva acento en esa frase chicanito

>Lloris looks like scared little white boy about to be gangbanged by blacks