Which one would win, Enterprise or Star Destroyer?

Which one would win, Enterprise or Star Destroyer?

Other urls found in this thread:

stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html
youtube.com/watch?v=vFCBwob65Nw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Enterprise is more mobile, however the top speed of a Star Destroyer is greater than the Enterprise's. If the star destroyer ever needs to retreat it would leave the Enterprise in the dust

Most Starfleet ships are absolute dogshit, they aren't even really weapons craft. They're exploration vessels.

The Enterprise would get absolutely shat upon.

One photon torpedo would decimate a Star Destroyer.

Has there ever been a crossover? Like a comic book or something?
If it hasn't happened feel free to steal my billion dollar idea.
Just make it fucking happen!

>Enterprise scans the entire structure and function of the hyperdrive while shrugging off lasers with impunity
>Scotty builds one while Spock derives jump calculations from first principles
>Kirk is getting a lapdance from a curvy yeoman at the time
>once Scotty and Spock finish they beam a 1cm cube of antimatter into the heart of the Star Destroyer and warp away from the kaboom
>the Federation now has hyperdrive and conquers the Milky Way in a few years

lol
a single missile boat could destroy the ent

star destroyers have massive shields

Pretty sure there's some autistic shit that analyzes their power generation out there.
Star destroyer wins I believe.

Hail the star destroyer for communications, Darth Vader answers, suddenly everyone on the bridge drops dead.

Im guessing The Star Destroyer since the enterprise gets obliterated every fucking movie

stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

empire would easily win

This literally happened

youtube.com/watch?v=vFCBwob65Nw

1. TNG clearly shows that laser weaponry bounces off the navigational deflectors without even needing to raise shields due to low energy density. The Enterprise can literally just sit there picking off TIE fighters with the phaser banks and be safe.
2. SW shields don't block scanning of any kind, and thus would be unable to block a transporter targeting process. Beaming a chunk of antimatter aboard is a guaranteed kill on any SW universe ship.

Federation shield are meant to defend against specific frequencies of phasers, not the pseudo-lasers Star Destroyers fire. let alone the ion cannons they have that would lower the shields anyways.

Trek crews literally sleep through intense ion storms. See previous comment about TNG.

>the Slave-1 could defeat the Ent-D
Trekfags BTFO

>nerd fights

is there anything gayer?

*grabs stacy* if you need us, we'll be fucking under the staircase while the hispanic janitor watches

roleplaying with yourself is definitely gayer

Point I'm making is the names of starwars weapons are deceiving. Lasers are actually glorified plasma cannons. it's debatable Federation shields would even work. The biggest argument the Federationfags can make is if the Star Destroyer can hit them, since it seems batteries are incapable of hitting anything smaller than a capital ship consistently.

Trek cucks btfo

Both of those "sources" are non canon and SW as a whole has a bad case of hugely exaggerating numbers. Stick to what's shown on screen and the Federation wins every time.

>comparing sci-fi tech to space fantasy tech
no fair

Plasma weaponry was used by the Romulans for centuries. Fed shields would 100% work.

That page uses things that both Star Trek and Star Wars can relate to, ie destroying asteroids and speed in crossing the galaxy to compare the two ships. By literally any standard SW is superior.

Enterprise is not a warship.

>Stick to what's shown on screen
The hell kind of argument sticks solely to the movies?
It's like eating a loaf of bread and calling it cake.

Except that they don't and Trek shields stop all lasers.

Imma go with the ship with actual shields and teleportation technology over the slow moving thing that required crew turning hand cranks to aim their guns.

Slave-1
Asteroid destruction: Jango Fett's seismic charges destroy asteroids in a radius of 5-10 km in AOTC.

Enterprise D
Asteroid destruction: according to Riker, it would take the entire photon torpedo payload to destroy a single 5km wide hollow asteroid in "Pegasus". In other words, it would take the entire payload of the Enterprise-D (a capital warship with a crew of a thousand) to equal just one of Jango Fett's seismic charges (a bounty hunter's weapon)

You don't understand that Star Trek, when they say "lasers" are talking about earth laser type technology? The blaster cannons on Star Destroyers are lasers only in name. If you compare their destructive capability from official sources the Empire's power is unmatched. You're caught up in semantics lol.

Trek is very clear that if it doesn't happen on camera it's not real. Star Wars should be held to the same standard.

One is taken down by a single fighter ramming it, what do you think a torpedo will do?

They are lasers only in the fact that they are fucking lasers.

Turning it into a semantics argument does not negate the fact that Trek is technologically superior to Wars.

Acclamator troop transport
Heavy guns: 2.4 million megatons (200 gigatons per shot from each turret, 12 turrets)

Ent-D
Photon torpedoes: 64 megatons max theoretical (based on 1.5 kg antimatter payload, p.129)

ur BTFO

But they're not beams of powerful light, they're bolts of plasma. Which explains their size and velocity.

>Push one star destroyer into another and they explode

LUL

Plasma weapons are also easily handled by Starfleet shields. Hell, a magneton pulse from the deflector dish could cause every plasma bolt on the field of battle to lose containment and turn the Empire's weapo s into confetti, since they use magnetic confinement for the tibanna gas.

We know the damage output of a starfleet photon torpedo. We know that if one galaxy class starship was firing on another, they would break through their shields. We know that the empire's heavy cannons do MUCH more damage than photon torpedos. We therefore know the empire would chew through starfleet shields in no time.

Sometimes I wonder why starfleet even has shields. Two blasts from the Romulans and shields are down 30%.

a Star Destroyer got knocked out by an asteroid in ESB, they suck

Sheev could probably turn anyone besides Kirk and Data to the dark side imo.

What if we bring this thing into play?

Star Wars is a universe where tech feels stagnant. Like from the Great Hyperspace War to the Galactic Civil War, what's really changed? Maybe a few upgrades here and there, but then everyone forgets and a war resets everything. Star Trek got on the beaming, replicating, and holodeck technology pretty fast.

>plasma cannon fire at sublight speed doing more damage than guided antimatter warheads at warp
I say again those numbers are fan wank bullshit

Beam a torpedo into the reactor and watch the kaboom. Dead before the main guns can ever fire.

>Beam a torpedo into the reactor and watch the kaboom.
beam through their shields?

It wouldn't be honorable for Worf to join the dark side.

Yes. SW shields can't block scanners, and therefore can't block transporter targeting.

but would he be interested in serving as a powerful warrior in a galaxy wide empire? I haven't watched any TNG in a while though, but I'm sure there are episodes that play on his adopted Klingon complex

Anger is the dark side and Klingons are driven by rage and blood lust. Honor is their system of restraining those emotions. The entire Empire would serve the Sith.

yep. i agree

>*grabs stacey*

This fucking guy.

>stardestroyer.net
>determines empire would win
lol, no bias there, amirite?

but math