/classical/

Ikr. Even his early stuff is amazing, not even to speak about his late stuff when he gets all mystic-mode. I find his early work harder to play properly than Chopin's. While Chopin's work is known for the emotional depth, and difficulty and wide range of freedom in interpretation, I find the harmony's in Scriabin's miniatures to be strikingly harder to grasp than those in Chopin's miniatures.

The emotional depth in these two etudes surpass anything Chopin wrote
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pc0i5HO9j4
youtube.com/watch?v=7AbMxNOWD6k

Ah Staviotslav Richter. I like you

And I agree when comparing miniatures of the two. These are stunningly rich.

Ravel is known for his restraint and studied under him.

strawpoll.me/14960336

strawpoll.me/14960336

strawpoll.me/14960336

Can we make this a Richter appreciation thread?
youtube.com/watch?v=wj5JxtVXMus

but he's an effeminate manlet

This is still one of the most haunting La Vallee des cloches i've heard in my life

I though Scriabin was a Rachmaninov lite when i heard Op. 8, No 12 and No. 5 Op. 42, Richters rendition of No. 5 is what made fall in love with Scriabin

>a bunch of mostly romantic era composers are soy because I don't like them

More like this?

goat scriabin makes me drift away
youtube.com/watch?v=SzYF6kfi2BM