Guntards, answer this question for me:
Why don't you support the right to bear nuclear arms?
When your stupid outdated toiletpaper of a constitution was written, the most advanced weapon that the average person could hope to get their hands on was a musket. This put the average person on equal footing against the British and the newly formed government of the United States of America as well.
Even if you morons discount the fact that the 2nd Amendment is about a "well regulated militia" and not simply about everyone owning a gun, you can at least agree that the founders had no clue about assault rifles that can have one crazy sandnigger take out 49 people and injure a bunch more, right? They weren't thinking about the future of weaponry when they wrote this.
But, even if you STILL want the weapons that the founders didn't know would exist in the future, then how do you justify NOT support the idea of the right to have nuclear weapons?
Checkmate, retards.
