/potter/ general

Name your wand edition.

See which house you belong to at my.pottermore.com/

You're just asking for it

>10 3/4"
>laughinghufflepuffgirls.png

>10 3/4" in length

Why would I bother to name my wand from one of the dulle

>sign up

fuck that. I'd name my wand stick because it's a stick.

>yfw you find out the Elder Wand is 15 inches

Something thats always bothered me is that spells require perfect (english) annunciation so how would world accents affect them?

...

13 inches
Slitheryn

It's ok I'll be fucking your girlfriends over the next 7 years

Please have sex

DULLEST

Repeating from last thread, Draco got the worst outcome in the end, heavily balding, beautiful wife dead, son is a beta male faggot, distant parents, and his rivals are all occupying top posts in the ministry. The only thing going for him is daddy's money. Why did Rowling do this to him?

It doesn't matter what you name your wand when you're stuck in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Fuck off /asp/

why the fuck did Harry destroy the Elder Wand? He could have been a powerful Wizard but instead is just some wagecuck and is married to an ugly ginger

i think from seeing the movies a couple of times you can actually use spells by having a perfectly clear idea of what action you want to do you can do magic without uttering a single word. The most powerful wizzards can do wandless magic 3 people are exposed to do this, Albus with his pyro-magic, voldemord and this guy reading a science book while stirring a cup of tea.

>Elder Wood, Dragon Heartstring, 9&3/4", Unyielding Flexibility wand
>Slytherin House
>Pukwudgie House
>Occamy Patronus
Who else /rarewood/ /rarepatronus/ here?

Big black wand

>that thicc as fuck body
>that butter as fuck face

that's not thicc you virginal fuck

The fuck is wrong with you all? When did Sup Forums become infested with fucking teenage girls?

opened this thread for this only

since 5ever

git gud

in the book he doesnt destroy it

got ravenclaw

>patronus is a dapple grey stallion
At least it wasn't a hare

yeah he shoved it in emma watsons ass for anal and swish and flick her pussy juice out

How does that work with faggot kids?