What went wrong?

What went wrong?

checked. what the fuck are those bottom pictures from?

hes not qt like eddie

He's too prim and proper.

He needs to grow some stubble, get a 2 on his head and start lifting.

He's got money, start fucking cheap whores in public and tell the police to suck his dick but cover his dick in bribes and they suck the dick but they get paper cuts all over their mouth and little did they know at the base of his dick is some salt so when they deep throat his dick the papercuts on the side of their mouth get salt and really sting

He'll be fine.

Nothing, he's just a Brit.

>rich, successful, a nice guy and is respected

True.

He got DUMBLEDORED

british genes mixed with jew genes

That's what happens when you are the protagonist in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.