Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong

Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong.

That's just like your opinion man

>inb4 clitoris
Why is it so easy to cut off then, which doesn't affect sex for the male at all?

This kind of thinking is why Sup Forums is filled with edgy virgins
grow up faggots

>politics

>>

uncommon

>shit lanky

>71K FOLLOWERS
lol that bitch is pleb tier
my gf has 175k, and she doesn't even have to show her tits off.

Holy shit how do you have internet? Don't the constant cyclones prevent any kind of first world development over there?

Usually after you state a thesis you back it with research

we ain't Indian
we loo in the loo
try again trumpfags

Public state of calamity in my pants right now.

There is no such thing as a "purpose", unless human beings give something a purpose. And even then it's arbitrary.
/thread

Sri Lanka has Zuckerberg-provded Wifi. Google it.

You're not doing either OP so you must be wrong.

Based Kumar

Your father would be proud

Actually from a scientific standpoint the purpose of humans (and all forms of life) is to reproduce

go make me a sandwich

You fucked it up. You threaded your own post. You could have made a good point and left it at that, but you had to let your faggotry go.

Let me guess. Cheated on or virgin? That's like saying males are just here for procreation. Takes two to tango

They can also ruin things

> Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the chad. Prove me wrong.
Fixed. Most men will never get pleasure from women

...

...

Ha ha. This. If you haven't realised yet, you're a shut in NEET loser

Actually most men have sex on a regular basis you just spend your time interacting with a bunch of other spergs on Sup Forums so you're not getting a real view of society

Everything changed when the Jewish nation attacked

>Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man.

pic related: it's your life story you faggot bitch.

Sorry, my trip didn't change??

CHECK'EM NOW, FAGGOT.

wtf is this flag

shit lanka

femanon here, Fucking black men is purely pleasure, they are generally stronger and last longer in bed compared to white boys. I plan on getting impregnated by a white man but black men are way better at making me cum. Their dicks are bigger and hit all the right spots. Black men can dance, they have rhythm and make good music. Sorry white boys, your time is up. I preach to all my white girlfriends that black men are better and they're starting to leave their white boyfriends and cheat on them They love me because ALL of them are satisfied.

Most black guys I know talk to are very well spoken, more athletic, more handy around the house than you washed up video game playing, anime watching nobodies. You're a fucking limpdick and you know it, you're not worthy of dating white women, that's why so many of us are gravitating towards black men. BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN.

>Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong

>but black men are way better at making me cum

Gr8 b8, m8. I rel8, str8 appreci8, and congratul8. I r8 this b8 an 8/8. Plz no h8, I'm str8 ir8. Cr8 more, can't w8. We should convers8, I won't ber8, my number is 8888888, ask for N8. No calls l8 or out of st8. If on a d8, ask K8 to loc8. Even with a full pl8, I always have time to communic8 so don't hesit8. dont forget to medit8 and particip8 and masturb8 to allevi8 your ability to tabul8 the f8. We should meet up m8 and convers8 on how we can cre8 more gr8 b8, I'm sure everyone would appreci8, no h8. I don't mean to defl8 your hopes, but its hard to dict8 where the b8 will rel8 and we may end up with out being appreci8d, I'm sure you can rel8. We can cre8 b8 like alexander the gr8, stretch posts longer than the Nile's str8s. We'll be the captains of b8, Sup Forums our first m8s the growth r8 will spread to reddit and like real est8 and be a flow r8 of gr8 b8, like a blind d8 we'll coll8, meet me upst8 where we can convers8, or ice sk8 or lose w8 infl8 our hot air baloons and fly, tail g8. We could land in Kuw8, eat a soup pl8 followed by a dessert pl8 the payment r8 won't be too ir8 and hopefully our currency won't defl8. We'll head to the Israeli-St8, taker over like Herod the gr8 and b8 the jewish masses, 8 million, m8. We could interrel8 communism, thought it's past it's maturity d8, a department of st8, volunteer st8. reduce the infant mortality r8, all in the name of making gr8 b8 m8

you are right. pic related.

R A R E
A
R
E

> That pathetic bait

C'mon man, you balkanshits usually had way stronger bantz-game than this.

sure is summer right now.

Men exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the woman. Prove me wrong.

Of course you're right

Everyone who says otherwise need to read their Bible more closely

>my gf has 175k, and she doesn't even have to show her tits off.
Sounds like she's a lot of people's gf mate, just saying.

1/10

>should we tell him why nature devised two genders to further its evolutionary progress

Sri=to shit in ruski
Shit in lanka

They exist for the sole reason of creating children actually. Pleasure is just a way to make it desirable to do so. Men exist for the sole reason of protecting the tribe against threats and ensure the children are safe to grow up.

This thread is fucking stupid. That's my point.

This is actual correct minus the pleasure part

Men are de facto worthless from a reproductive standpoint

1 man can impregnate thousands of women in his lifetime meanwhile 1 woman can only have about 20 pregnancies making her infinitely more valuable

Society could rebuild if there was 1 man left and 100 women
If there was 1 woman left and 100 men then the species would be doomed
This is just an example

And weaning children. After that a man can do everything better.

>Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong.
I won't. Its the most reasonable thing i ve read here since a long time.
enjoy your 'modern and liberate' whores, faggots.

On man, that stings...

If that was the case they wouldn't have vocal cords

...

>Society could rebuild if there was 1 man left and 100 women
A women majority society would never succeed, women don't know what they want, the man would be ostracized, castrated or killed.
>If there was 1 woman left and 100 men then the species would be doomed
In this instance, an aplha male would come up and impregnate the girl only girl his own, the offspring would be left to grow and mature and the rest of the men could copulate with the subsequent offspring while avoiding incest, it'll take time but a functioning society could emerge

Their smaller statue and tiny hands also make them better at cleaning under furniture.

>impregnate the girl only girl his own
Impregnate the only girl left on his own

You are wrong.

Men just exist to inseminate women. Prove me wrong.

women are made for black cox

Women majority societies are destined to fail

This body is made for ________

Men and women exist to feed the giant insects that use pheromones to force hallucinations on us.

It's about rebuilding the species which can't be done with a severe shortage of women

Those 100 men would likely end up killing eachother to get to the woman and she would probably end up dead as well

A woman can only have 20 children in her lifetime

A man can have thousands of children in his lifetime which is what makes men de facto worthless reproductively speaking

...

best post in the thread

>Those 100 men would likely end up killing eachother to get to the woman and she would probably end up dead as well
No, that would not happen

Men aren't women, men know how to think and build societies

A cunt majority society wouldn't know what it wants, EVER

This is not a society that would last very long.
It is there for 1 generation.
If there is only 1 woman and 100 men the risks would be too high. What happens if the woman dies in childbirth, if she has an accident, if she is sick, etc. Also just the numbers. It would take a society with 1 woman around 3 generations to reach the correct gender ratio even if each woman has 12 children and everything works out perfectly. Not even taking into account the social issues that would come with having 1 woman for 100 men.

RARE

Ahh yes I'm sure he other 99 men would just lay down and let the "alpha" take the woman

Also one man can lead 100 women but 100 men cannot build anything with only one woman around
The child-bearing resource is simply too scare

"Women right after fourteen years
are called ladies by the men.
Therefore seeing that there is nothing else for them,
but only to sleep with men,
they begin to beautify themselves
and in this put all hopes.

So it is valuable to make sure they understand
that they are honored for nothing else
than to appear orderly and modest."

Epictetus dissagrees

me

So I guess I'm a chad??
hmmm that was easy !

I wonder what else I can do!!!

Yes of course. And man is intended for the protection and safekeeping of the woman and resulting family. Why would anyone deny this?

That is statistically wrong.

...

They have to nurse the offspring also.
Checkmate.

>What happens if the woman dies in childbirth, if she has an accident, if she is sick, etc
Then we would have a short lived society and nothing else, with ever lasting monuments.
>Ahh yes I'm sure he other 99 men would just lay down and let the "alpha" take the woman
Yes, they would

Men would be able to come up with an agreement since we aren't women

I'm just repeating myself at this point, I feel like I'm talking to my wife right now

Men have built societies and won war...
Only thing women have contributed is making men more comfortable and making more men.

luckily men harvested and controlled this precious resource for their own needs for most of history.

They bleed for men almost every month

White women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring brown men.
Prove me wrong.

>Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong.

They also raise children which doesn't necessarily correspond to procreation and pleasuring the male.

sauce plz

>Then we would have a short lived society and nothing else, with ever lasting monuments.
There you go.
A group of 100 women and 1 men just has higher chances of survival because even if they lose the man at some point some of the women would already be pregnant. A man does not need to wait 9 months.
You just don't seem to understand biology.
>Men would be able to come up with an agreement since we aren't women
Being men is not the only thing that matters when trying to decide something.
It is unlikely that the men would accept effectively working to support the child of the one man that gets to have the woman.

You realize she was paid 4x her normal wage for that photo shoot because a nigger touched her.

>Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation
this applies to men too.

>They also raise children
And they have been doing a shit job at that

Just look at the amount of faggots the world has these days

School staff are dominated by women, you can clearly see how much bullshit is coming out of schools nowadays

She's daffy

She posted some shit on her Twitter about how she liked fucking black guys to get back at her racist parents

That girl is a fucking drug-addled mess and it will be surprising if she lives past 30

No, the only non-streetshitters were the Tamils.

The Tamils fought for decades to retain their loos, but were ultimately defeated, and Tamil territories are now one large designated shitting area.

>School staff are dominated by women, you can clearly see how much bullshit is coming out of schools nowadays

That has less to do with women and more to do with the curriculum used by public schools

I went to a private school and of course most of the teachers were women but we didn't get all that liberal bullshit cause private schools don't have to push the government agenda

Women also cook and take care of children/elderly.

Men exist for the sole purpose of procreation and working for the woman. Prove me wrong.

Men exist for the sole purposes of fertilizing a female. Prove me wrong.

They also exist to raise and nurture children.

It all depends on how you look at the human existence. If everything is relative and every interpretation has the same validity then yes. There's literally nothing to talk about since we are a perturbation in the universe. But if we believe there is some greater purpose for our existence - that we're actually working towards something as a human race then no - it has been (almost always) men that have been pushing the humanity forward (whereever it may lead). So I would say a greater purpose for men can exists, but it depends on you if you consider it valid or real.

No matter what I said to you I can't come up with a thoughtful reply since it doesn't seem to get into your head

I keep seeing that fucking Canadian flag and I'm reminded of the liberal mess your country is in

I give up

Men also hunt, protect and build.

this.
top 10 flag, too

this

tweens btfo

The west is going down, sad