why is it ok for every ethnic group - aside from whites - to approach politics racially? blacks, hispanics, asians, they all openly consider what a politician is doing for their racial community and it's even ok to talk about. but if a white person says "what is this candidate doing for the interests of whites?" its considered extremely racist
I just don't get it. Why don't they feel like whites deserves to think about their own interests?
Other urls found in this thread:
counter-currents.com
vimeo.com
vimeo.com
twitter.com
because jews and cultural marxism. if you just look at the left, and how they view muslims compared to christians, they are clearly anti-white. that's their main thing. anti-white and anti-western civilization
the way to destroy western civilization is to destroy white people
It's pretty obvious why. Because leftists hate white people and therefore their opinion does not matter to them. They're not even subtle about it either, "Only whites can be racist", etc.
>"what is this candidate doing for the interests of whites?
Is this being said all the time here and isn't pretty much a conservative motto?
> Because they want to Genocide us further.
You have to wait until you're a minority.
Shouldn't be long now.
Because 6 million and "literally Hitler."
They are hypocrits anti-whites.
What you have to realize is that modern leftism is based around the idea that when the white man "gives back" what he "stole" then all will be equal and we'll be singing kumbaya around the bonfire.
This is why they take so many contradictory positions. They support Muslim invasion and gay rights because it hurts and disenfranchises the white, conservative man.
want to breed her now/10
>Hispanics
STOP
Hispanic is a really broad term that includes europeans. Using it only to refer to loud fucking california Mexicans is ignorant. Say mexican to refer to those loud beaners not hispanic
There is a self contained trope hidden in your question.
It's a fine term. 80 percent of them subscribe to un American ideals so it's fine to bloc then together.
This piece by Jonathan Bowden sums it up nicely.
White cuckolds do it too, just that It's for the benefit of other races than their own
Its obvious the left hate white men. I don't think they believe they can destroy the West because they have no idea that Islam is everything they hate in conservative values.
>why is it ok for every ethnic group - aside from whites - to approach politics racially?
It isn't ok. But they do it anyway. Leftists don't have to follow "rules" and "laws."
who's this jizz wiz
> Hey user. What's up?
it is okay. multiracial societies aren't supposed to exist anyway
It's like a kid asking, there is a mother's day and a father's day, why isn't there a kid's day?
Every day is already kid's day. Similarity, white people are already the most privileged group. They don't need more privilege.
literally native off a reservation pro trump so is every brown fuck here we hate mexicans more then anything.
Let's see here....
We should take a look at history and see what it can tell us.
When white people first encountered blacks they said something along the lines of " those poor savages, they don't know any better. Ooo! I know! Lets teach them out ways!"
When they saw the Indians. Same thing. Now fast forward centuries later and what do we find out? The white man has lowered his apperent status because he believes he's superior to every other race.
>Every day is already kid's day.
LOL! Tell that to my dungeon birds.
"Master racing' in the 1930s really put a damper on white pride Bob. It's not going to change any time soon.
Enjoy
>Africans enslave other Africans for hundreds of years
>Europeans arrive
>Africans kidnap their own countrymen, bring them to coastal trading posts and sell them for beads
>Europeans become the first people in history to decide to end slavery on moral grounds
>Europeans free the slaves and let them remain in their countries
>Europeans people are evil
Except that it's not. Tell that to the millions of whites who don't have that privilege. I swear people like you are so autistic. Here's a thought experiment. The US is made up about 60% whites give or take. Wouldn't it make sense that there will be more rich, poor and in middle? Blacks only make up 10% for crying out loud.
>its the same shitskin Canacuck shitposting in multiple threads
They believe the meme that ALL whites are privileged oppressors and that the systems of government and business and society are built around maintaining some fictional reality(that many seem to think actually exists) wherein all whites are born silver spoon in hand, have everything handed to them regardless of effort or merit et cetera. So they think the idea of white identity politics is redundant and even offensive. They truly believe in some white supremacist power structure that horribly oppresses others that THEY are working tirelessly to disassemble. So they think poor and middle class whites thinking in terms of their own interest is really a continuation of that "oppressive" system.
Of course we all know that the only rigging of the system in the modern US is crony capitalists rigging it in favor of the already super wealthy at the expense of EVERYONE, and IF whites do better at this point it's because a lot of us still try hard and take responsibility for ourselves and our actions and are able to maintain some semblance of success and prosperity rather than sit and stew in poverty and blame others for everything, trying to take what others have earned rather than try to earn it ourselves. You know, like black people tend to do.
That's not working for me Frenchie! You must supply video footage of this most demonic succubus
Uh, probably because whites have had power since forever. Don't act like you're too retarded to understand that.
>all whites are born silver spoon in hand, have everything handed to them regardless of effort or merit et cetera
Because most of the people pushing for this stuff seem to be white academics and students who actually were born with silver spoons. They can't conceptualise things like black on white racism because their own lives have been so sheltered from these things.
Kind of like how Sup Forums believes that all Jews are in on the NWO, huh?
What a blowhard
I wasted five minutes reading a vapid preface to nothing
Africans enslave other Africans for hundreds of years
Thousands mate
>vimeo.com
Do it without the astrik.
You will not regret it. That 1 second of nipple was the happiest I have been in months.
It doesn't include Europeans. It doesn't even include Brazilians.
Because you're a fucking pussy who cries about people calling you racist instead of knocking them to the ground and crushing their shitskin/race-traitor skulls.
>why is it ok for every ethnic group - aside from whites - to approach politics racially?
>whites
>founded fascism
>perfected the caste system
>Nationalism
>why is it ok for every ethnic group - aside from whites - to approach politics racially?
Considering as how its was 100% O.K. for white people to use genetic traits, birth rites, and xenophobic law as their main advantages over other, darker colored races up until 20 years ago, I'd like to wonder why its not ok that other races abuse the same "if it looks like X then its pure" politics the way white people have for the past millennium?
Because nonwhites have a reasonable basis to combine as a political group. They have shared experiences that link them all, unlike white people. White politics and white dominance is the default.
None of these things that you listed are exclusive to white people
Conservatives make their policies for the good of everyone. Liberals do what they do for minorities only
So maybe you could explain why you disagree with the 25 page article you read in five minutes.
just imagine this women being penetrated by stong big black man. His penis with shape and size of evian bottle slowly penetrating that beutiful blonde creature. both get all sweaty and came at the same time.
When a higher entity is in touch with lower entities it adapts its behavior to the danger the lower entity exudes. This leads to tolerance, the higher entity lets its guards down since the lower entity appears to be of no great harm.
The lower entity does act differently. It keeps its guards up knowing the potential of the higher entity, not giving up the slightest percentage of power.
Both trends lead to the moment, in which the tolerance, the lack of self-assertion finally kicks in, the tolerant entity is on the losing side.
The lower entity now is more powerful, but without the tolerance concerning the once superior peer. This leads to the destruction of the higher entity.
The higher the entity the shorter the leash must be.
Because of what has happened in the past when whites have been so politically assertive.
It's whites themselves that stifle any in-group preference amongst other whites. The issue is that our tribe is infested with fifth columns and we will never have solidarity until there is only one kind of white person: the kind that doesn't put up with shit from other tribes.