Sup Forums considers this a human being

> Sup Forums considers this a human being

Other urls found in this thread:

spuc.org.uk/abortion/human-development-of-the-unborn-child
nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002398.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I consider you a living thing too you faggot.

>implying you can tell if a zygote is white or black

>americans
>not shitskin monkeys

Kek

Oh shiet

> Sup Forums considers spics and nigs human beings

a human being is 23 chromosome pairs that make up its DNA blueprint

that blueprint exists in that clump of cells as it exists in the trillions of cells that make up a fully grown adult

at the most basic molecular level, there is no difference

wew lads

/thread

you can

there are certain genes that code for skin color, skull shape, intelligence, etc., all traits that define the races

you can sequence the genome of zygote and and determine it's genotype and the phenotype it will code fore.

You were once this. And you are arguing that you are not human because of it.
This guy has a valid point.
Life is what it is, you cannot deny it because it does not look or speak or think like you.

>People hate their unborn children enough to murder them before they even meet them

So the other half are performed on white "majority" women with our stellar 1.3 children per couple.

>implying I would ever mate with an american

I'm sorry it's a bad shitpost but I have to follow through with it.

Fine, it's life. Now kill it.

Didnt mean to quote u senpai

He's making a nigger joke. If you can tell it is black you wouldn't consider it human.

>a human being is 23 chromosome pairs that make up its DNA blueprint

Nice definition you just pulled from your ass. Th fact of the matter is that clump of cells has not developed into a human and has no more rights than a plant.

what is your definition then?

It is considered life, but it's not considered sentient or a human you dumb nigger. A leaf is more complex form of life than that.

Close to yours. I would probably just add "must have consciousness", and probably "must be homo sapiens" so you don't say

>so intelligent aliens are human huh

Basically at any point before the baby can hear or think it is not really human and can be terminated without remorse.

>1 post by this ID

>must have consciousness
ooh cute.

a human doesn't become self aware until at least 18 months of age.

do you think it's justified to kill an infant if you don't want it, then?

>Basically at any point before the baby can hear or think it is not really human
also wrong

>By 30 days, just two weeks past mother's first missed period, the baby - one quarter of an inch long - has a brain of unmistakable human proportions, eyes, ears, mouth, kidneys, liver, an umbilical cord and a heart pumping blood he has made himself

>From the sixteenth week the foetus responds to light. If a blinking light is shone on to the mother's abdomen, the foetal heartbeat fluctuates.

I did not say self aware. I said consciousness. Sentience. It's the only thing that separates us from animals.

>I said consciousness. Sentience.

that's what being self aware is, you dumbfuck

Don't know if trolling or victim of American education system.

>There is evidence that from four months the foetus responds to sound. Doctors testing unborn children for deafness, while monitoring their reactions to noise with ultrasound (a technique for visualising the children in utero), have observed eye movements and "blink-startle" responses in foetuses of 16 to 32 weeks gestation.

spuc.org.uk/abortion/human-development-of-the-unborn-child

you've convinced me that abortion is not all bad

if you had been aborted we'd all be better off

According to user reacting to environmental triggers barely the animal (you have to use the singular because apparently there is just one, the animal and the human, which have nothing in common whatsoever).
I say abortion should be ok until it haves a driver license.

If abortion is done before any signs of brain activity, I don't view it as ethically wrong.

Kind of a shitty argument. An adult elephant is a more advanced form of life than an infant, humans don't even become self aware until about 2 years of age. Yet which one's life would society assign more value to?

I'm really just playing devil's advocate, though, I support abortion up to a reasonable point. I just think the "it's not life!" argument liberals like to use is hypocritical and baseless. Just admit it's murder but for the greater good (most babies who are aborted would end up being raised by poor/unqualified teenage or black mothers, would suffer from congenital diseases and never live a normal life, etc.).

*makes you barely
I should drink coffee before shitposting.

Teenage mothership is only bad if you believe the leftist meme that women belong to the workplace instead of staying at home and caring for the children.

>vegans don't eat eggs
checkmate

This is correct.

about five weeks after conception

nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002398.htm

The best part of you ran down your mamas leg

What, you don't? That's a real human bean right there.

Life on a distant planet would be incredible news because as far as we know, Earth is the only planet to support life.

Human pregnancy is process that is well documented and understood and is much less miraculous. Cells found in a woman's womb are also pretty common as nearly female on the planet is capable of getting pregnant.

Only if its white.