USA vs. China

Who will you side with in the upcoming Yank-Chink War?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OhEHB0a7Uyg
youtube.com/watch?v=M_ze1hZJA9Y&list=PLzp3f0Wp4KL-1D2aWuSuXVaz7OZwmt3r0&ytbChannel=ComradePopov
youtube.com/watch?v=seOsuJw3ucw&t=193s&ytbChannel=Godrules
nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/report-china-could-have-351-navy-ships-bigger-america-navy-18940
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Israel

USA because we are Westerners.

USA deserves total annihilation.

This

Winning side
Neutral side

Whichever side Russia is on.

when i was to china our guide said to us almost with an open text it would be nice if china managed to force russia to give it an access to the japanese sea on the other side of korean peninsula

i am with the usa here, pls burgers, save us from the yellow peril

communism never lost a world war, so PRC

For some reason, my intuition tells me that WW3 will be us and you against China. Then our countries will go back to hating each other again like normal.

There won't be a war because nukes.

America hands down

tipping us to shift allegiances to China

*gets nuked in the first second*

*nukes everyone else*

wow... this is modern warfare ...

We won't directly engage them or any other nuclear power.

well right now china has only one carrier that they bought from ukraine in 90ss (cheated the poor ukrainians having said that it was for building a floating casino btw) and considering that even russia struggles to actually use its carrier in practice, chinese carrier is of no particular threat... yet

As long as you're somehow caught in the cross fire, the world wins.

actually over large terrain nukes are less useful, its not the case in japan tho

i even had some idea that we technically can evacuate cities then american/allies nukes are useless because all of siberia cannot be nuked

its all tricky however

Formaly neutral. Would fight for any country in the Americas that is not those 3 cucked little fuckers next to Brazil

why does everyone assume china and us would go to war?

that's silly

USA
youtube.com/watch?v=OhEHB0a7Uyg

I select.

General Anvil

>The Iron Dragon Will March Through You Defenses

youtube.com/watch?v=M_ze1hZJA9Y&list=PLzp3f0Wp4KL-1D2aWuSuXVaz7OZwmt3r0&ytbChannel=ComradePopov

no it isn't

nukes literally won't work on highly decentralized large area, and we can evacuate/hide most valuable things

cities and infrastructure will be destroyed but its not a big deal

but as i said its a doomsday scenario, when you don't have anything better

>its possible to evacuate entire cities in a few minutes
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

>upcoming Yank-Chink War?

The tension between India and china is more realistic atm.

Which side would you guys support if they went war?

Why are both superpowers absolute shit culture with shitty people.

But at least China has some history while USA is a degenerate non-nation

General Anvil >>>>>>>>> General Poo in Loo

Like we'll have an option...

China nuked its "history"
the Chinese are literally just slant Yankees

you obviously should be prepared

also my original plan was: you first evacuate cities (to literally forests by trucks, you need minutes for this), then you fire nukes FIRST

then it works

but likely it wont be like this, you could do this trick in the 80s maybe, today its more complicated

says a midget using Internet 24 hours, who ate burger from MacDonalds at lunch

>, and we can evacuate/hide most valuable things
>cities and infrastructure will be destroyed but its not a big deal
Nigga what? The point of a nuclear strike isn't to kill a large number of people, that's just an unfortunate consequence, the point is to destroy en masse. It absolutely is a big deal if cities and infrastructure are destroyed.

>But at least China has some history while USA is a degenerate non-nation


This


I would never stand with Babylon 2.0

i know, but you can save some minimal infrastructure by this and most of people

also we pretty much did this in ww2 so....

our cities is not something really important its just commieblocks and shit

I think we'd be officially neutral. Who wants to buy some guns?

We are the new Rome.

I'd compare it more like, new USSR.

comrade

it's rome -> constantinople -> moscow succession, dude
we are the new rome ><

you can be "the great whore that sitteth upon many waters with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication", i don't mind

the description is very fitting btw

no one

>be journeyman electrician
>able to afford house on a few forested acres next to national forest
>new vehicle
>get to own and carry guns
>get to practice my religion freely
>have freedom to speak my mind without fear of government repression or legal civilian violence
>get income taxed at about 25% because live in high HDI, high tax state
If that's the case, the the USSR was pretty sweet.

Pic unrelated; just went fishing

>the the USSR was pretty sweet.


You'll find out just how sweet it was in your lifetime,. joe.

Neutrality as always.

Fuck both.

>kings of the earth have committed fornication
I think you misunderstand things, you e*stern pig. What else is to be expected of one who can't even properly understand the nature of the Trinity?

FILIOQUE
I
L
I
O
Q
U
E

come on, even your own poet walt whitman wrote "And you, Lady of Ships! you Mannahatta!" it's a clear allusion to the whore of babylon

You're being alarmist and hyperbolic. If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were trying to get a rise out of some folks. Of course, a good-natured fella such as yourself would never do something so banal.

Jesus christ you speak exceptional English. You probably know more about our poetry than most burgers.

Idgaf, just giving it to you raw and uncensored.

The statue of liberty is literally a goddess of fornication.

youtube.com/watch?v=seOsuJw3ucw&t=193s&ytbChannel=Godrules

Or he was talking about a coastal city that features features a giant statue of a woman as one of its most iconic landmarks. This city is especially important as a port city.
It sure is great having all of these ports that are usable year-round.
Then I think you're mistaken as to the realities of either the USA or the USSR.

you think shit

The obvious, clear winning side.

So the Yanks.

Why are you being so rude?

Annex Montana while all their troops are away at war.

Considering the size of the Canadian military, fucking US coast guard could just walk over, retake Montana, travel north and probably take BC, Alberta and Sasky with minimal casualties.

>implying we have a choice

>fucking US coast guard could just walk over

The US Coast Guard was mobilized in Vietnam, they would be against China too.

I'd side with China to destroy USA if my country wasn't so close to China. Best case scenario is they both utterly annihilate each other and some irrelavant fuck who is far away from everyone become the next warmonger. Like Australia, Canada or Saudi Arabia.

the US will likely be a fireball at that time, as well as its army

depends on how well nukes work

>Considering the size of the Canadian military

3 times the US Coast Guard? Did you actually have a point or just shooting in the dark to feel success-by-proxy by pretending you're American like most shit talking kangaroo fuckers?

>Like Australia, Canada or Saudi Arabia.

You forgot poland >:^)

Truly the Polish century ahead of us.

It'd be super interesting if you become a superpower really. (Based on FUN alone) Can only imagine what you'd do to Germany and Russia.

I'm surprised there hasn't been a leaf post about 1814 yet.

>Germany and Russia.

think...

eye for an eye

tooth for a tooth

>the planet will likely be a fireball at that time
I think the Coloradans best sum up a lot of attitudes in this country with their state motto, "Nil Sine Numine" ("Nothing Without Providence").

>The obvious, clear winning side.
>So the Yanks.
So obvious they couldn't win the Korean war once the Chinese intervened, even though back then China was far, far behind the US, economically and technologically.

The combined police force of the US states within 2 states of the Candian border in the middle of the US (not going any further East past Wisconsin) totals nearly 20,000. We've seen how quickly the US police force can resemble a military unit when killing nignogs.

Canadian regular military numbers 27,000 strong.
Combine US police force with irregulars with guns and the Canadian military is gonna have a hard time getting further than 1 state into the US.

U.S.A ! U.S.A!

Because they were fighting the Chinese on their doorstep. The capabilities of wars are entirely different when a country has to cross an ocean or pass through skies they dont own.

How do you suppose the Chinese even cross the pacific with their 2 aircraft carriers? The US more than likely has more ships protecting the Pacific shipping lanes than China could produce in 10 years.

>Because they were fighting the Chinese on their doorstep.
That's part of it, yes. But also the fact that quantity is a quality of it's own. We know. We lost two world wars even though in each of those wars we had the best k/d ratio, were man for man the best fighters etc. etc.

>How do you suppose the Chinese even cross the pacific with their 2 aircraft carriers?
nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/report-china-could-have-351-navy-ships-bigger-america-navy-18940
You're completely underestimating the growth of China. And I don't even blame you for that. Humans are very bad at judging/estimating the consequences of exponential growth.
They have far larger shipbuilding capacities already. In a long drawn out war (which it will inevitably become if it doesn't go nuclear) the production capacities and manpower decide the outcome.
The Chinese economy surpassed the American economy in size in 2014, if you take PPP as comparison metric, like CIA, IMF and the like do because it's the most accurate measure for comparing countries. By 2030 their economy will be twice as large of they keep growing at a rate 5% higher than the US.

Alright you win. You know more English than any of us.

Wait Canada has 27,000 in its military?

Jesus we spend so much fucking money subsidizing others... but it's worth it because it gives us a knife to their throat.

We'll see and laugh.

Assuming no nukes it will be a stalemate

>USA navally invades China

>gets kicked out by China's enormous army

>China tries to navally invade the USA

> the US navy destroys the chinese navy

中国。

Wouldn't even be a fair contest. Our submarines could just fire nuclear-tipped SLBMs and annihilate their entire coastline.

Will suck you off if you win

More like

>US bombers fly over chinese cities dropping explosives like no tomorrow
>Millions of chinks die until we run out of money and hippies protest and we leave

More like
>Nuclear strikes everywhere
>Literal fallout

You've also got to consider the effects of nuclear fallout from such large-scale use of nuclear weapons. Even if you did (somehow) evacuate most of the civilian population from the cities, the fallout could in fact make these cities and their surroundings uninhabitable. Then all you have is a bunch of Russians sitting in the woods dying of radiation poisoning and cancer.

There's also the effect mass detonations would have on global climate and weather patterns. Overall 'just evacuate' isn't a very sound plan, neither for the Ruskies, the Yankees or the world at large.

USA

you deserve a Somali cock up ur ass