Who would win? If both get commited to kill each other

Who would win? If both get commited to kill each other

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=naXEF8gr7EU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Either one.

Sherlock manages to have even more plot armor than Hannibal so Sherlock would probably win.

sherlock would try too hard to be clever and mads would just destroy him

After 3 seasons of one upping and barely surviving they end up fucking and Watson and Will kill themselves because they will never be with their soulmates.

sherlock would win. his mind palace is way more autistic than hannibals. hannibal just has a bunch of high art crap in it

definitely Hannibal, Sherlock is too autistic

It would depend on the circumstances. Like, if they just happened to be in the same town together and Sherlock discovered Hannibal was a killer, and Hannibal knew Sherlock knew about him, it could be a neverending series of mind games. But if Sherlock found a way to reeeally piss Hannibal off, make it personal somehow, I'm pretty sure Hannibal would wreck all his shit. Season 2's finale wasn't just a bloodbath, it was a blood MAELSTROM.

>Hannibal will never be the antagonist of a BBC Sherlock series

why live

Book Sherlock sweeps 10/10, BBC Sherlock gets his shit kicked in like the autistic assclown he is.

His brother was though.

This. Fuck BBC Sherlock, he's a fucking retard. The original Sherlock would wipe the floor with Hannibal and then get Watson to shoot him.

BBC Sherlock will win because they need ebin plot twists.

Hannibal.
sherlock may outsmart hannibal for a bit, but hannibal would eventually stop playing games. make sherlock eat his own legs, then let him go and continue playing games

Reminder that Jeremy Brett is the best Holmes.

>Jeremy Brett
>not Matt Fewer

Hannibal would just need to create a scheme to lure Sherlock toward a puzzle which ultimately results in his capture and dismemberment.

Hell, even in episode one of Sherlock, he nearly self injested a cyanide capsule because he wanted to know if he was smarter than a dying cab driver

Is Hannibal with Mikkelsen good?

this

also this

Sherlock because he the power of asspulls. You can shoot him in the face and he'll just pop up behind you explaining how that was actually just 3 small Haitian children he payed 5 bucks to wear his jacket because he figured out you were going to shoot him before you actually decided to do it.

>when John finds Sherlock's half eaten body

youtube.com/watch?v=naXEF8gr7EU

>Sherlock manages to have even more plot armor than Hannibal
That's highly debatable. Hannibal managed to bend time and space to his whim to avoid detection.

Sherlock is an omnipotent being, ergo, he'd win quite easily.

It's enjoyable but the show goes off the rails through sheer silliness. Hannibal is a cartoonish villain with absurd plot armor. At one point he literally renovates a man's home in the span of a few hours to frame him.

Book Sherlock got bamboozled by a woman and then multiple times by Moriarty

Forget it OP, you're never going to get a real debate in this meme board. Go to a real fictional character vs site like spacebattles

I think this is a problem with every show that involves characters far more intelligent than the writers, they end up having no way to demonstrate their competence other than making them pull off impossible feats.

It's implied that the show takes place in a more violent alternate universe, and that Hannibal is a supernatural being and quite possibly Satan. That or simply unreliable narration. I never had a problem with this show because it doesn't remotely try to be realistic. It was part of the appeal. Sherlock, however, tries to pass everything off as grounded in reality, which is laughable.

Who would win in a cooking contest though?

Can Sherlock even fry a goddamn egg? How is this even a question?

If Sherlock's so smart, how come he can't cook?
Checkmate, atheists.

Never liked eating liver, I suppose this makes a culinary pleb.

>It's implied that the show takes place in a more violent alternate universe, and that Hannibal is a supernatural being and quite possibly Satan
No it isn't.
>That or simply unreliable narration.
It's absolutely unreliable narration, dingus. The character who serves as the audience's view into the world is literally mentally ill and has hallucinations.
>I never had a problem with this show because it doesn't remotely try to be realistic. It was part of the appeal.
Except that's wrong. It objectively, inarguably tried to ground itself in reality with a CSI team and the stresses of the investigations taking huge tolls on the investigators. Just because the writing ended up being silly and cartoonish doesn't mean it was supposed to be that way.

probably this desu

yes

I always got so hungry watching Hannibal. Food Porn at it's finest.

If Watson beefed that chick on the bus, how come Garrett Jacob Hobbs was so windswept? Checkmate mushroom people.

I might even watch this

Watson might but Will was practically forced to be with Hannibal

...

Hannibal would easily thwart Sherlock, probably drug him up and keep him as a pet for a little while.

and sherlock jumped off a building to his death and still lived

No, Sherlock threw Moriarty's corpse off the building with an extremely realistic face mask on top of his only minutes after witnessing Moriarty's random suicide

No, you see the writers had no explanation whatsoever for his survival, and decided to go all meta in commentary on the original Holmes surviving the Reichenbach Falls when Doyle was forced to bring him back.

There was never meant to be an answer because all the solutions are fucking dumb, and the writers think their fans are idiots for trying to come up with one.

Sherlocks cockiness will be his doom

The solution for Holmes surviving Reichenbach was as simple as "he clung to a ledge" in the books. Simple. Relatively believable. Doesn't clutter up an entire story. Holmes and Watson can go back to solving mysteries a paragraph after the reveal.

But the show writers just had to go full tumblr pandering and """""""meta"""""".

Yet another reason I hate this show.

>implying the annual Dr Chilton JUSTing isn't one of the best things about the show

Why hasn't Chilton killed himself already?

Because it's impossible

He's even better than Anthony Hopkins.

>At one point he literally renovates a man's home in the span of a few hours to frame him.
what episode?

This isn't even a question. In no situation does the otter survive this.

Its not good, it's fucking great

It's like his role was written for Mads. The guy pulls that shit perfect - way better than the original

The rest of the cast is kinda meh. Will and Jack are alright as well

>literally Sup Forums tier thread

get the fuck out.

>still no anthological tv show where each season it's just famous detectives/characters pitted against each other

Aren't most of the characters pretty much public domain right now?

I just want my Sherlock vs Poirot

...

if you watch that episode again he never actually tells you how they did it but showed all the theories

because he will be buffalo bill

isn't human liver extremely toxic?

4U