>be Canada >be major participant in Great War to such a degree that Nazis protect your war memorials in occupied France >safeguard Atlantic Ocean >fly with Brits against Germans during Battle of Britain >supply Britain and Soviet Union with thousands of aircraft and tanks >liberate North Africa, Italy, France and Holland with Yanks and Brits >work on Manhattan Project with Brits and Yanks >finish the war with 4th largest air force and 5th largest navy in the entire world >slip into irrelevance and international cuckoldry decades later >vote in a drama teacher who promises free weed and a minority white population >legalize animal buggery and criminalize free speech >all because it's the CURRENT YEAR
Why do people give a shit about the irrelevant crap Trudeau does? Policy wise he is basically the same as Harper. But retards hear him say "something something diversity" and libshits cum their pants while cuckservatives heads explode with rage, meanwhile nobody pays attention to him fellating billionaires, poisoning our natural heritage and crushing the middle class just like Harper did.
Dominic Hughes
>its another whiny ass sore loser cuckservative episode
Jayden Walker
>everything's the same, didn't you hear about the horseshoe theory?
Charles Morales
>be major participant in Great War to such a degree that Nazis protect your war memorials in occupied France ????
Jackson Evans
Do you need this translated into Burgerese?
Hunter Perez
This isn't horseshoe theory m8, the fact is that most of Harper's economic and foreign policies have been continued by Trudeau. C-51, anti labour, and pro-oil etc. legislation is all still on the books. We are still fighting pointless oil wars overseas, and still sucking up to the banks. All he's done is trot out some feel good rainbow image and all the Tumblr shitheads are eating it up while inbred Albertans rage about a guy who is continuing most of the same policies as his predecessor.
Kevin Gray
this 2bh
saying a bunch of nonsensical SJW tripe on twitter doesn't actually change anything in terms of policy, it's simply a very effective distraction
Daniel Collins
>Policy wise he is basically the same as Harper. >But retards hear him say "something something diversity" and libshits cum their pants while cuckservatives heads explode with rage
Of course it is you retard. Show me where the policies of the Harper admin and Trudeau admin intersect.
Ryder Perry
>saying a bunch of nonsensical SJW tripe on twitter doesn't actually change anything in terms of policy Except when you know, they make criticism of Islam essentially a crime.
Austin Rivera
yes pls, hat.
Carson Russell
It means that after the conquest of France the Canadian Government was making up bullshit lies how the Nazis were destroying Allied war memorials for WWI (specifically the Vimy Ridge memorial) and Hitler made a point of showing the world that the memorial was intact and was actually being protected by German soldiers from destruction and vandalism.
They didn't fucking do that, they passed a non binding resolution condemning Islamaphobia. It was literally just parliament officially saying "Islamaphobia is bad mmkay".
Ayden Smith
>motion >bill jog on, underage Sup Forumsyp
Alexander Martin
I'd also add it was one Hitler's favourite war memorials because it honoured the fallen without the display or arms and military equipment.
Ethan Morgan
...
Landon White
>motions aren't indicative of policy You tried.
>How are they different? You need to tell me how they're the same first, faggot.
>again thinking a passed motion isn't indicative of policy >thinking false virtue signalling isn't indicative of Canadian liberals
Hunter Foster
Neat. How come no one ever talks about countries like Canada, Denmark, Romania, Albania, Slovenia or Finland about what they did in WW2.
Sebastian Thompson
>How come no one ever talks about countries like Canada, Denmark, Romania, Albania, Slovenia or Finland about what they did in WW2.
You have your ears plugged.
Nicholas Gonzalez
Is it true that you can be charged for misidentifying someone's """"gender"""?
>Take this country out back and shoot it. No thanks. I have a lot more respect for leafs off the back of posting here. It's nice to see some of you still wearing your (British) identity.
The leaves I've met IRL have been slavshits, chinks or SJW types who have ZERO respect for your identity and past, instead looking to America.
At least with republican antelopians you know they're just being tsundere. Leafs are a whole different breed. Multicultural crypto-yanks.
Nathaniel Sanchez
I genuinely feel sorry for you all.
I remember I met this Canadian girl who ended up really liking me. She seemed pretty cool. But.. after our presidential election she asked me who I voted for. I said Trump. Man did she get pissed. She literally said "WOW.. I didn't know you hate women"
Christopher Ross
>The leaves I've met IRL have been slavshits, chinks or SJW types who have ZERO respect for your identity and past, instead looking to America. Where was this exactly? I live on the East Coast and rarely have to endure any of these people.
Nolan Scott
>4th largest air force and 5th largest navy in the entire world hehe canadians are so cute!
Austin Jenkins
why do you hate women you dirty trump-voter :^)
Sebastian Jones
I don't know lad.
She was really mad. She literally said "I I can't believe I like you. How can you be such a negative person... how can you be so hateful"
Dylan Young
Canucks belong in gas chambers.
Nathaniel Diaz
Really sounds like you dodged a bullet with that dumb bitch.
Christian Thompson
rich chinks and shit travelling to the UK
monarchist sentiment is still strong here
Kevin Hill
Yeah, I broke things off soon after.
What pissed me off the most was I'm 25, she's 20 and she acted like I don't know shit about my own country's politics
Justin Mitchell
Here mostly mate. (((L O N D O N.))) It didn't stike me as jestful, but maybe I'm 2 autistic 2 into canak humour (I doubt it) I'll give you ONE example: a slavshit legit baller who used to shit on the UK AND (made me see red more desu) Canada. He got baited by yank war films I think, but it made me SICK that you invited this guy and his senpai in you cunt, and he disrepects you like that. "lol canada didnt do shit in the war" kind of bollox. Canaks were badass mofos back in the day, and still likely are in the provences.
He pays no tax in Canada and makes more than most btw. I don't know how you lads deal with C&C on a corptax level, but I'm tempted to doxx lmao
Lucas Hill
libtard canadians hate trump even conservatives generally don't like him you wont find much suppor there for him
Cooper Gomez
I don't like Trudeau. But I'm not going to bitch to a Canadian about how they are so terrible for voting for him. It's not my place, im not a Canadian
Levi Turner
The problem is we have 3 shit parties instead of 2. NDP is used to siphon votes.
Hunter Sanchez
OOOOOO CAAAANAADDAAA
Sebastian Edwards
That sounds awful
Julian Roberts
2 parties, 3 parties, and these countries call themselves democratic when even russia has 4 major parties in the parliament :^)
Michael Allen
I want Canada to annex us, only because I want Trudeau to be my president
Eli Sullivan
Your country is essentially a corrupt gangster state. Not a whole lot to be proud of given the last 100 years of your history.
Angel Howard
>I don't know how you lads deal with C&C on a corptax level I have his offshore accounts...
Austin Phillips
Nah, we'd rather have Turks and Caicos.
Jordan Collins
pshaw
we wuz kangz we wuz superpowah!
and now we have more parties in the parliament than you :3
Levi Green
but we actually change leaders occasionally
Brody Morris
Make Russia Tsarist Again
Charles Roberts
I liked that he allowed scientists to speak to the press again, and getting assisted dying squared away. Legalization is fine as it means people will finally shut the fuck up about how it needs to happen. Alberta shouldn't really complain given how pro-oil Trudeau is.
Daniel Campbell
Hate propaganda against transexuals is illegal- hate propaganda being trying to advocate genocide to the public. In private conservation between individuals or with family its still legal to discuss genocide or teach children that it is immoral. Its also illegal to discriminate against transsexuals, which means you can't hire or fire based on the condition of their genitals.
it is _very_ tame, but people are very melodramatic about it because Canadians have so few things to bitch about.
Justin Kelly
Yes. You also gave birth to Dr. Jordan Peterson. For every reaction.. We might lol when it's the BBC making their "typical representations" of Roman Britain, or when Canada outlaws "misgendering" individuals, but ultimately, if you don't cut cancer out it spreads.
Owen Brown
I think you misunderstand. Misgenerding has nothing to do with the amendment to section 318, it strictly covers hate propaganda (which is language specifically pertaining to genocide) and discrimination (which is ground for companies to hire/fire). Nothing in the law says anything about pronouns.
Ryder Jones
Define discrimination. Is misgendering someone on purpose technically discrimination?
Noah Diaz
...
Xavier Gomez
I'll give you what the law considers discrimination " he law amends the Canadian Human Rights Act by adding "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination. That makes it illegal to deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits to individuals based on their gender identity or gender expression within a federal regulated industry. A person who denies benefits because of the gender identity or gender expression of another person could be liable to provide monetary reimbursement. This prohibition would only apply to matters within federal jurisdiction."
Notice how there's not mention of private citizens calling trans people by the wrong pronoun.
Jason Brooks
I don't recall the last time she made a decision on our behalf.
Don't confuse a figurehead for a ruler.
t. leaf that sings god save the queen on remembrance day
Anthony Cox
She doesn't have long to go.
Oliver Perez
>he law amends the Canadian Human Rights Act by adding "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination Yeah but what the fuck does that mean? They don't define what discrimination is because it's too broad and they can't.
>That makes it illegal to deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits to individuals based on their gender identity or gender expression within a federal regulated industry Shouldn't be illegal.
So far the law has only deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits to individuals based on their gender identity, but again what the fuck is discrimination? Can I protest aganist transexuals in the public square?
Christopher White
that dog is already dead...
Ian Russell
What do you mean 'discrimination' is to broad of term? Maybe based on how lefties use it to mean 'generally make someone special feel bad'- but it has a pretty clear cut definition, which is 'the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.'
Protesting for violence (genocide) against transsexuals is now illegal, just like in any other circumstance. If protesting in a public square about people mangling their genitals is that important to you, I'm genuinely sorry that your freedom of speech is being impaired, but then again I really fucking hate people who protest in public against social issues.
Tyler Robinson
>the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. If you don't think that opens a barrel of monkeys you're an idiot, don't know what to tell ya.
>If protesting in a public square about people mangling their genitals is that important to you, I'm genuinely sorry that your freedom of speech is being impaired, but then again I really fucking hate people who protest in public against social issues. That's such a passive-aggressive Canadian thing to say.
Jonathan James
Those two don't seem alike user, are you being disingenious?
Protesting for violence was surely already illegal. Fuck it is in America where freedom of speech (aka freedom to call a nog a nog) is a constitutional right.
This """law""" legitimises (enables.. fugg even CHAMPIONS) spiritually abhorrent behavior.
Nathaniel Ross
It's pretty clear what it means to a court 'Did you deny this person a promotion on the grounds that they had mutilated genitals'. pretty cut and dry. I really don't see how its morally defensible for someone to stand on a street corner with a megaphone and try to incite violence- not even the Westboro baptist church does that shit. Aside from that its just really annoying to people walking by.
Isaac Walker
>It's pretty clear what it means to a court 'Did you deny this person a promotion on the grounds that they had mutilated genitals'. pretty cut and dry. It's pretty clear you're strawmanning my argument into "muh denied promotions for trannies."
>I really don't see how its morally defensible for someone to stand on a street corner with a megaphone and try to incite violence- not even the Westboro baptist church does that shit. Aside from that its just really annoying to people walking by. Wow, you're doing it again. You're good at this.
Thomas Johnson
You're correct. That's because bill C-51 makes two amendments. One is to add 'gender identity' as a term (just like race, age, sex, religion) to laws that protect against discrimination (calling someone an old fart is not discrimination, firing them because they're old is). The other protects against hate propaganda (just like with race, age, sex, religion) so that calls to incite violence can be met with a fine. The only time the criminal code has been enforced with respect to hate propaganda was against some Jew brasher that went on a rant about how they should have been made extinct. He was fined, but it was then latter overturned.
Again this law is very tame, and is just there to placate people who actually are concerned about being fired due to their dickless status.
Kayden Morales
I'm not strawmaning your argument. The criminal code just uses precise language to describe when discrimination has taken place. >'deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits'
Chase Wilson
Again, you're being disingenious. RE whatever the fuck I had in my head when I fired you, you best believe that I've recorded something non-discriminatory regardless of legality. Opens you up to all sorts of lawsuits and negative PR buzz. Not that I'd have hired you in the first place mind.
Nope, this is straight up social engineering.
Robert Foster
You're retarded and are deliberately misrepresenting what I'm saying because you're too insecure to actually face criticism.
The firing process is already like that though. Companies keep records on their employees and spend weeks going through them to make sure that they're free of liability. This isn't social engineering, its really placating minorities.
Colton Hughes
I already read it, piss off. You're a faggot.
Joshua Hill
And thanks to our laws- its perfectly legal for you to call me a faggot. God keep our land.
Julian Perry
>The Constitution of Canada incorporates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.Section 2 of the Charter grants to everyone, among other things, freedom of conscience and religion, and freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media. Section 1 restricts the granted freedoms by making them subject "only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society >only to such reasonable limits
And thanks to your retarded sensibilities and spreading of misinformation our country is sinking more and more into the gutter. Consider doctor assisted euthanasia.
Jaxon Gomez
>The firing process is already like that though Exactly. You could never discriminate on the basis of somebodies gender/race/whatever the fuck. Again, if these things bother you, why hire them in the first place, lol. You don't exactly send them a rejection email reading: "dear xir, you have to go back, best regards user" -- not that modern recruiters bother with that level of interaction anyway lolz, but you get the idea. Basically anything discriminatory is bad news. Legally, or certainly in terms of optics.
Am I just spouted Sup Forums memes if I thought this law will take children into care if their parents "misgender" them?
Is that true? Cos that sounds awfully like hate speech to me, user. I respect freedom of expression, but your right to express yourself stops the minute my black-trans-lesbian-muslim gf (male) takes offense to your bigoted comments.
William Rivera
>Am I just spouted Sup Forums memes if I thought this law will take children into care if their parents "misgender" them? This is 100% meme tier, as I said one of the members of the senate asked if this bill protected families that though that transsexuality was immoral from educating their children about how wrong it was. The bill protects that right.
>Hate speech EXACTLY! Which is really what this is about; people confusing the words 'discrimination' and 'hate propaganda' with 'hate speech' and making assumptions about what each of those things are without reading the criminal code, or assuming they're all the same thing.
Oliver Lewis
Define hate speech.
Christian Roberts
Canada should become a monolingual French-speaking country.
Thomas Russell
>was immoral from educating their children about how wrong it was. that's not what I meant. my understanding was if my child identifies as trans, and I don't support that, they can be taken into care. It's meme tier because we're ALL going that way.
Gavin Bell
Exactly.. Where's the line drawn between speech and propaganda.
Nathaniel Williams
Well the bill has nothing to do with redefining 'child abuse' as it deals with discrimination and hate propaganda. The closest the bill comes to families is in that example, talking about if its okay to teach your children to resent trans people. So to answer your question, to my knowledge that is not a crime- that would be something to actually get pissy over.
Sebastian Adams
Sections 318, 319, and 320 of the Code forbid hate propaganda.[3] "Hate propaganda" means "any writing, sign or visible representation that advocates or promotes genocide or the communication of which by any person would constitute an offence under section 319."
Under section 319, an accused is not guilty: (a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true; (b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text; (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or (d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.
Asher Murphy
Whoops. forget section 319
Section 319 prescribes penalties from a fine to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years for anyone who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace.
Andrew Wilson
>that would be something to actually get pissy over. Heh. Well that's where I find myself scratching my head over legislation. Mostly I identify as a 'don't tred on me' snek, but retards probably need their kids taken off them & forced sterilisation.
If da joos are an outgroup: isn't Sup Forums also.
Isaac Brown
I mean its a tricky path to tread. I'm okay with the law because its something I figured already existed (preventing demonstrations to incite violence and HR junk). the only issue I have with it is not being able to deny service- but I can see why individuals would want that right.
Sebastian Taylor
this, justin shows himself to be conservative through actual political action and only panders to the liberals. It's a perfect system
Xavier Williams
>tfw canadian
Mason Carter
because canada painted itself a new history and we don't talk about such things
Caleb Garcia
Centrist done right, imo. Retain a conservative economic policy and deficit spend on liberal social policies. Doubt it will pay off in the end, though. Chase two hares, and you'll catch neither.