South Africa was a mistake. The USA is a terrible example with new problems arising every day. Latin America...enough said. Western Europe is kinda declining too.
The only semi-successes might be Canada and Australia, but they're largely just living with Asians.
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Honestly, no.
Not when we're living in a world populated by supposedly sovereign nation states and have distict cultural and ethic differences, anyway.
The future is beautiful anyway, user, chill the fuck out with your bigotry.
this post made me hungary
>Thinking that all of the world problems come from multiculturalism
>Latin America
>multiculturalism
We are a homogenous population, we are all equally Amerindian, no wh*Te people here
no. maybe singapore, india, or iran but they still have lots of shitshows
Monaco... it works in Monaco
>multiculturalism
What? Do you mean "persons with different skin racial groups living together?" Because that isn't multiculturalism
This as dubs show or Singapore, HongKong, basically where everyone is rich
What the fuck are you taklking about? No society on earth is rid of large issues and Canada and Australia are well off only in relative terms, a lot of people lead desperate shit lifes in those countries. Going further is not like "mono-cultural" societies, like Japan or Iceland are doing all that much better.
We are not at the "end of history" were societies have become as wealthy and happy as they can be and we are certainly not going to get there with backwards idiots wanting to turn the clock back to some jerk off fantasy of a past that was never real. Xenophobia is the recourse of angry losers, yes, there's problems with migration, you don't solve them by avoiding reality.
>We are not at the "end of history" were societies have become as wealthy and happy as they can be and we are certainly not going to get there with backwards idiots wanting to turn the clock back to some jerk off fantasy of a past that was never real. Xenophobia is the recourse of angry losers, yes, there's problems with migration, you don't solve them by avoiding reality.
Oh come the fuck on.
Nobody "hates" foreigners, or if they do they're more "bluepilled" than most. But since I'm going full cliche, if you can't tidy your room how the fuck are you going to fix the world?
none.
everyone should live in their own countries based on their ancestry.
I have heard Malasya has a muslim population and that surprisingly they mix together well, is that true?
Their national identity supercedes their cultural ones (GB would be another example) - not really multiculturalism in the same way that "lol UK was always a raindow" now is it?
>tfw all anglos come home
>tfw all foreigners go home
W-well our labour crisis seems averted, but we appear to be MORE full, not less
We do, our issues have nothing to do with racial problems, it's just that we're all equally dumb
Russia
You can solve fucking migration issues without going full fucking biggot.
>Give full labor rights and protections to illegal workers, it means there's no upside to using them, only liability and potential losses. Punishing employers through strenghtening human rights is a win-win.
>Make trade fair, a system rigged in a way in which countries like the US consume 1/5th the world's resources but think they're getting ripped off because source nations also want to amnufacture is bullshit. There's ecological devastation in Madagascar so wealthy countries get cheap "organic" palm oil, slavery in Thailand so first worlders get cheap shrimp, sweatshops in Bangladesh where children aged 6 are working full time shifts making clothes for first worlders. You want to buy what your nation produces, then pay full fucking price and stop trying to import every goddamn luxury available.
>Stop making exceptions for dumb fuck Christian fundamentalists, you can't very well tell Muslims what they do is wrong when you're allowing the local psychos to pull the same shit. They're actually right to call discrimination, just do one set of rules for all, no special snowflake exceptions for homegrown idiots.
There's a large etcetera of things you could do without resorting to fucking fascism, it's all just basic fairness in the end. But no, you'd rather just vent your hatred in ineffectual solutions. My country would be rid off the drug war if Amerilards just fucking curbed their demand for drugs, they could either make them legal or actually fucking enforce their own prohibition, they choose to do neither.
You greedy fucking cunts can't have your cake and eat it too, so cry me a river if your sperm count dwindles and your women won't fuck you. One way or another things are changing, amybe your fucking countries would be better off if people bothered to raise families rather than fucking piss on the world's poor and the environment.
So assimilating the national identity doesnt count as multiculturalism? Now that I think of it then LatAm isnt really multicultural on the sense you and possibly OP give since we all assimilated into our own countries culture.
Multiculturalism works here with certain cultures, but not with all.
Dutch culture, Indonesian culture and Surinamese culture goes fine.
But adding in Muslim culture or American culture creates conflict.
But it took centuries here before even protestants and catholics could live together. Until WW2 we had different schools, different newspapers, different sport fields, different unions, different work places etc for them.
>blaming Americans because YOUR people are committing crimes
Really? Call me jaded, but they weren't making drugs, they'd find some other way to make a profit.
Please stop strawmanning. I'm not a bigot, nor would I propose facist solutions. Things are changing, but sadly nor for yours or my liking, keep doubling down on your retardation and fail to see the nuance and things will go full 14/88, that I promise you.
>War on Drugs
Yeah, you can't really change human nature sadly. What we can do is legalise, regulate and use the tax money to further prevention and detox schemes. Would take the cash out of the cartels hands immediately and place it back into the States (peoples.)
Fugg man, just read what you wrote. Negativity breeds negatively. We need to work on solutions (globally) but turning every first world country into Brazil 2.0 is clearly not the way forward.
I guess what I was trying to point out is the difference between languages raw definition and the baggage certain phrases carry. The New World is an odd one I admit, but can any of you really say you've made it a success of it, truly?
>blaming Americans because YOUR people are committing crimes
So because they dont directly do the drug business they arent responsible? Thats like saying dictators arent responsible for deaths occured on their goverment because said dictator didnt go and personally killed them.
>but can any of you really say you've made it a success of it, truly?
It could be WAY more better but its not the fault of multiculturalism or being "dumb brown people". The country since its independence has had different factions trying to rule but since most governing jobs where occupied by spaniards rather than criollos (spanish born in Mexico, didnt have the same rights even though they were exactly the same) when the spanish left they didnt know how to govern and left the country with stagnated development
It used to be Colombia's problem, then they militarized the country into a police state and were able to shut down air/sea routes for smuggling, it became our problem. So we surrender our own civil rights for the sake of creating another police state? Nah amn, this isn't idle people deciding to turn criminals.
I proposed ways to make you not Brazil 2.0 and stop migration. I'm not fucking for it man, it's wreaked havoc in my country by allowing the corrupt to remain in power as those who found the system unbearable had the choice to leave rather than fight. Now youth and talent which was costly for my country to raise is being used in the benefit of another society, same thing as the brain drain, we are not investing on producing fucking MDs so they can move LEGALLY to America.
Large migration rates are fucking toxic for developing countries but hey, they help keep advanced economes growing, someone's gotta work once the population in countries like yours ages to the point pensioners become a significant portion of society.
I think you got me wrong if you think I'm advocating open borders for migration.
Democracy + Multiculturalism(Multiracialism) just doesn't work.
>South Africa was a mistake.
FUCKOFF 3RD WORLD SHITHOLE
It's exactly the fault of multiculturalism then. I wouldn't dare blame it on the (""dumb brown"" -- internalised racism much) natives.
Listen, we have sectarian/cultural/ethnical issues on THE FUCKING BRITISH ISLES in 2017. We ruled Ireland for HUNDREDS OF YEARS AND IT'S STILL A PROBLEM. See for another example.
People gonna people. Let's tidy our rooms first, then we can play together.
Sorry didn't realise I was replying to two seperate people without ID, timestamp made this clear even if the contents of your post didn't! (They do)
International COOPERATION, but we have to recognise our differences. Diversity is our strength, after all!
If we give advantage to migrant more will come. We should just put them in concentration camp before sending back to their countries .
If you want to read about it.
>These pillars all have their own social institutions: their own newspapers, broadcasting organisations, political parties, trade unions and farmers' associations, banks, schools, hospitals, universities, Scouting organisations and sports clubs. Some companies even hire only personnel of a specific religion or ideology[dubious – discuss]. This leads to a situation where many people have no personal contact with people from another pillar
en.wikipedia.org
Now that's what I call multiculturalism. :^)
Even Canada & Australia won't be successful because you will see more and more tribalism and identity politics. You can only have a meritocracy in a non-multicultural society.
Yes Julian is spot on.
It doesn't matter, honestly. Canada is multi-ethnic, and works fine. The US, France and especially many African countires are also multi-ethnic, and are shitholes. Japan is mono-ethnic, and is a great country, while Somalia and North Korea are also 100% mono-ethnic, and are complete disasters.
Economy, politics, natural resources, stability, there are so many factors that determine whether a country is good or not. Having a lot of immigrants only becomes a problem when they won't integrate properly, as can be seen in the US vs. Canada where they integrate fine.
tl;dr: Immigration only becomes a problem if integration fails, and a large immigrant population is not a recipe for disaster, nor is no immigrants a recipe for success.
>So because they dont directly do the drug business they arent responsible?
They play a part, but it's not entirely their fault. Mexico is a different country, it's not the Americans' job to police your country. It just shows how incompetent the Mexican government is when they can't even control their own people. The criminals at least I mean. Massacres and mass graves. Shameful.
You guys need to solve your own problems, because nobody else is going to do it for you. I know it sounds harsh but it's the truth. Blaming the yanks won't solve anything. It's not like you can put pressure on them anyway to change their practices. I mean, you're certainly welcome to try, but I think you know deep down it's not the solution.
>It used to be Colombia's problem, then they militarized the country into a police state and were able to shut down air/sea routes for smuggling, it became our problem. So we surrender our own civil rights for the sake of creating another police state?
I'm sure there are other ways to solve this, without curtailing the rights of innocent people.