Wew, are they gonna do it?
Trips decides where the missile actually lands.
Wew, are they gonna do it?
Other urls found in this thread:
Estados Unidos de America
Seoul
Hopefully, they'll nuke one redneck state
NUKE CALIFORNIA PLEASE
Singapore
Seoul please
Memes aside the only solution is to nuke Kim as soon as possible.
NUKE TEXAS
CALIFORNIA IS RIGHTFUL MEXICAN CLAY STAY AWAY FROM IT.
All you foreigners are disgusting
NUKE MEXICO CITY NOW
Moon
Alabama get
NUKE TOKYO
Tokyo
Alabama
i don't like your rude statement
please be a good catholic and apologize for your claims
>empty threats from trump and Kim
Yawn
NUKE MEXICO CITY RIGHT NOW. REEEEEE
norks already did a test over japan before though, it's on the us if they save or lose face from this because the koreans will def do it and the missile defense the us has to shoot down these types of missiles have a 10% success rate
>Nuke guam
>USA nukes pyongyang
That'll show them!
that's a south korean television.
lying as always trying to cause a war
koreans belong to hell
ENGLAND
NUKE SYDNEY
Kys stupid unironic literal communist faggot
LAS GUAM SON ARGENTINAS
up my asshole
YTN is like South Korea's equivalent of America's FOX, but lighter.
Anyways, moon again.
India for lulz
Beijing
Moon
Oh no what has Trump done???
Nuke Florida since Americans hate Florida
never trust the korean
rolling for Washington DC
Come on, Miami, Florida.
reroll
Jamaica
Rolling again
Stockholm
Nuke California pls
beijing
Pyongyang.
middle east
Hiroshima
Dresden
For old times sake
My ass since I have a muscle problem.
Why would they? The only purpose of NK is to keep the regime in power.
They have all their bunkers so they would be fine.
Again
sure they will
like every threat from norks.
please just nuke brunswick in melbourne and nothing else
Nuke Hiroshima again please
trips for Marseille
reroll
Great Marshall please nuke Portugal.
>into water
pussies
Albania because they have a lot of bunkers so they'll live and no one gets harmed :)
PLEASE NUKE MOSCOW
ONLY MOSKOW THE CAUSE OF ALL YOUR TROUBLES
Oslo.
Lel.
JAAAAA
we got a winner
I'm OK with this as long as it's on a day when parliament is in full session.
is this gook smiling?
NUKE SINGAPORE, sorry Malaysia and Indonesia ;_;
Nuke Seoul please
Second nuke on Toronto pls
seoul, tokyo, new york
reroll
JUST FUCKING NUKE THE MIDGET. FFS YOU PUSSIES
Nuke Mexico City so I don't have to go to school today.
but why my friend
Barcelona
...
in the water
after the us pacific fleet shoots it down
Chavs BTFO
Japan
RIP
Philadelphia, PA.
all of america
Seattle
Islamabad
they fuck up and lands in pyongyang
I think if they actually do launch those missles, we'll shoot them down.
Don't fuck with us Little kim
Aren't missile defense systems essentially untested in real settings though?
I mean, Israel has one which is used IRL, but it's only used against shitty homemade rockets, and even then it doesn't have a 100% success rate.
cali, my digits confirm it.
We've been testing our missile interceptors the past month or so.
The biggest question is. When we shoot down those missiles.. what will Kim do? Will he bitch out like the pussy he is, or will he start the war?
missile defense systems aren't really tested in a real life scenario.
the Americans haven't told us what parameters they used for their tests.
did they know where the missile was launching from? the time? what is was targeting? did the missile tumble? did it have decoys that you knew about? what if it was more then one missile?
Americans like to think they have a defense against ICBM's but even if it's 80% chance of interception, 5 nukes shot off, one will still land.
Washington DC
DC, Yokosuka. Yokota
>Americans like to think they have a defense against ICBM's but even if it's 80% chance of interception, 5 nukes shot off, one will still land.
Implying we'd only launch 1 interceptor missile per nuke..
We'd launch 5 per nuke
>DC
but... then I won't be able to post anymore
right, you launch 5 per nuke, to counter 5 nukes you need 25 interceptors. now you'll have to concentrate that many interceptors just to protect ONE region. what if they don't strike at that region where you've loaded up 25 interceptors for 5 nukes? it's a numbers game. you can't cover every area.
not even taking into account that it's never been tested by america to launch 25 interceptors at once and how that may screw with the technology.
Somewhere in Spain, it doesn't matter as long as its in Spain.
>implying we don't have missile defense systems all over the place
if your military was so confidant it's ability to intercept nuclear warheads with certainty, you guys wouldn't give two shits about NK's nukes.
your arrogance is the reason why nobody really takes you guys seriously anymore.
We do give a shit, because we care about South Korea and Japan. Just because we can shoot down an ICBM doesn't mean that our allies aren't at risk.
Sorry user, its the only way to get rid of the swamp.