Wew, are they gonna do it?

Wew, are they gonna do it?
Trips decides where the missile actually lands.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dg_MIysNGIU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Estados Unidos de America

Seoul

Hopefully, they'll nuke one redneck state

NUKE CALIFORNIA PLEASE

Singapore

Seoul please

Memes aside the only solution is to nuke Kim as soon as possible.

NUKE TEXAS

CALIFORNIA IS RIGHTFUL MEXICAN CLAY STAY AWAY FROM IT.

All you foreigners are disgusting

NUKE MEXICO CITY NOW

Moon

Alabama get

NUKE TOKYO

Tokyo

Alabama

i don't like your rude statement
please be a good catholic and apologize for your claims

>empty threats from trump and Kim
Yawn

NUKE MEXICO CITY RIGHT NOW. REEEEEE

norks already did a test over japan before though, it's on the us if they save or lose face from this because the koreans will def do it and the missile defense the us has to shoot down these types of missiles have a 10% success rate

>Nuke guam
>USA nukes pyongyang
That'll show them!

that's a south korean television.

lying as always trying to cause a war

koreans belong to hell

ENGLAND

NUKE SYDNEY

Kys stupid unironic literal communist faggot

LAS GUAM SON ARGENTINAS

up my asshole

YTN is like South Korea's equivalent of America's FOX, but lighter.

Anyways, moon again.

India for lulz

Beijing

Moon

Oh no what has Trump done???

Nuke Florida since Americans hate Florida

never trust the korean

rolling for Washington DC

Come on, Miami, Florida.

reroll

Jamaica

Rolling again

Stockholm

Nuke California pls

beijing

Pyongyang.

middle east

Hiroshima

Dresden
For old times sake

My ass since I have a muscle problem.

Why would they? The only purpose of NK is to keep the regime in power.

They have all their bunkers so they would be fine.

Again

sure they will
like every threat from norks.

please just nuke brunswick in melbourne and nothing else

Nuke Hiroshima again please

trips for Marseille

reroll

Great Marshall please nuke Portugal.

>into water
pussies

Albania because they have a lot of bunkers so they'll live and no one gets harmed :)

PLEASE NUKE MOSCOW

ONLY MOSKOW THE CAUSE OF ALL YOUR TROUBLES

Oslo.

Lel.

JAAAAA

we got a winner

I'm OK with this as long as it's on a day when parliament is in full session.

is this gook smiling?

NUKE SINGAPORE, sorry Malaysia and Indonesia ;_;

Nuke Seoul please

RIP USA

youtube.com/watch?v=dg_MIysNGIU

Second nuke on Toronto pls

seoul, tokyo, new york

reroll

JUST FUCKING NUKE THE MIDGET. FFS YOU PUSSIES

Nuke Mexico City so I don't have to go to school today.

but why my friend

Barcelona

...

in the water

after the us pacific fleet shoots it down

Chavs BTFO

Japan

RIP

Philadelphia, PA.

all of america

Seattle

Islamabad

they fuck up and lands in pyongyang

I think if they actually do launch those missles, we'll shoot them down.

Don't fuck with us Little kim

Aren't missile defense systems essentially untested in real settings though?

I mean, Israel has one which is used IRL, but it's only used against shitty homemade rockets, and even then it doesn't have a 100% success rate.

cali, my digits confirm it.

We've been testing our missile interceptors the past month or so.

The biggest question is. When we shoot down those missiles.. what will Kim do? Will he bitch out like the pussy he is, or will he start the war?

missile defense systems aren't really tested in a real life scenario.

the Americans haven't told us what parameters they used for their tests.

did they know where the missile was launching from? the time? what is was targeting? did the missile tumble? did it have decoys that you knew about? what if it was more then one missile?

Americans like to think they have a defense against ICBM's but even if it's 80% chance of interception, 5 nukes shot off, one will still land.

Washington DC

DC, Yokosuka. Yokota

>Americans like to think they have a defense against ICBM's but even if it's 80% chance of interception, 5 nukes shot off, one will still land.

Implying we'd only launch 1 interceptor missile per nuke..

We'd launch 5 per nuke

>DC

but... then I won't be able to post anymore

right, you launch 5 per nuke, to counter 5 nukes you need 25 interceptors. now you'll have to concentrate that many interceptors just to protect ONE region. what if they don't strike at that region where you've loaded up 25 interceptors for 5 nukes? it's a numbers game. you can't cover every area.

not even taking into account that it's never been tested by america to launch 25 interceptors at once and how that may screw with the technology.

Somewhere in Spain, it doesn't matter as long as its in Spain.

>implying we don't have missile defense systems all over the place

if your military was so confidant it's ability to intercept nuclear warheads with certainty, you guys wouldn't give two shits about NK's nukes.

your arrogance is the reason why nobody really takes you guys seriously anymore.

We do give a shit, because we care about South Korea and Japan. Just because we can shoot down an ICBM doesn't mean that our allies aren't at risk.

Sorry user, its the only way to get rid of the swamp.