Should people be allowed to own billions when a good half of the population of this world struggle to put food on the...

Should people be allowed to own billions when a good half of the population of this world struggle to put food on the table ?

Call me a ditry communist but this doesn' feel right to me

Other urls found in this thread:

politicsinn.com/48-percent-of-u-s-billionaires-are-jewish/
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Kill yourself stupid Commie. When will you retards learn.

Yes, they should

>I dont like people that work harder than me and rewarded for it with money

You're free to give them as much of your own money as you like. No one will stop you.

It''s because you want to give them someone else's money that you should go fuck yourself.

>Posting on a computer in a first world country

Lesson number 1 of Communism:
If you speak English and own a computer, you are part of the Bourgeoisie.
You are richer than 90% of the world population. You are the enemy of communism.

You want to bitch about other peoples money?
How about you get rid of your own material wealth first.

That sounds like loser talk.

>feel
That's the problem

its not right, but every time someone does somethingto intervene it just makes things worse

give someone aid, they become dependent. put people to work they become exploited. try to teach people things and the feel patronized and insulted. the only thing to do is let people be and hope that there is at least enough oppurtunity for the change to occur

what makes you entitled to their success?

should good looking guys also have to send ugly guys women because a good half of the population struggle to get laid?

Is it okay to take food grown in nations with high IQ nations, give it to low IQ breeders, only to have them invade the high IQ nations and destroying the civilized world?

>dat pic

If she dropped the veil and told me she is Spanish (European) I would fuck her.

>feel

Why not?they let retards like you own internet access.

>Should people be allowed to own billions when a good half of the population of this world struggle to put food on the table ?

Yep

Only if they earned it legitimately.
If a inventor makes something that changes the world, who are you to say that you're entitled to speak for his wealth produced from his idea?

allowed?

well fuck you

Yes. If they played their cards right, made some good calls and had some luck they deserve to be that rich. I do think there should be a limit on inheritance though so that the descendants of these billionaires can't just live off the fortune without contributing anything new.

Maybe they should stop shitting out kids and expecting the west to take care of them.

Next you're going to say we shouldn't take Soros, Rockefella and Rothschild fortune from them

That's why taxes should be higher.

>africans are starving
>africa's population has tripled in less than 40 years

Which one is it? If they're starving to death they wouldn't be popping out babies at the rate they are, and if you actually traveled there you would find out that the claims are complete bullshit.

Why are westerners so fucking stupid?

There's no science that allows you to find ideal wealth difference between the poorest people on earth and the richest to create the best civilization


>IQ talk
......

>yes goyim yes oy vey I earned my billions how dare you imply otherwise now go back to working 16 hour shifts so I can loan you money so you can buy a house and a car and oh yes don't forget to finance the latest iPhone which is no different from last year's model you NEED to buy it goyim how else am I going to protect my profits?

Defenders of capitalism are the ultimate goodest of goys

No, it would only compound our problems by causing a mass population increase while not fixing any of the original problems in the parts of the worlds that were struggling

so it gets increasingly hard to run with that model until the cost to sustain the necrotic half will surpass the contributions then we're just fucked

tl;dr- no areas of the world that are doing poorly would only exacerbate problems to maintain themselves while also putting a huge cost to the planets sustainability

as it stands the world needs to lose india and china to become ecologically sustainable with our current practices

Let them beg to be colonized again.
Then laugh as we tell them to go fuck themselves.

"worked harder" isn't the same as being born into wealth and means with a sever advantage over the rest of the population, furthermore with means to prevent anyone else from reaching your station. No billionaire is that rich from 100% legal means.

I blame boomers and TV. Things will be much more pleasant when the last boomer is six feet under.

How dare you care about other human lives. How dare you think most billionaires shouldn't be able to throw stacks of hundred dollar bills into their fire places just to keep warm at night.

You make me sick.

No one posted that webm of the chink talking shit to an African about them fucking the country up?

>No, it would only compound our problems by causing a mass population increase

Yeah people start making money once they grow out of misery, that's a well known fact

we've seen that happen times and time again


(stop posting user)

Ceylon is an island nation off the coast of India. It has a tropical climate, plenty of rainfall and great soil. It was once said that telephone poles would take root there.

Then the peasants revolted. It became Sri Lanka. The workers and wealthy fled at gunpoint, leaving only the poor. They were too lazy to even plant crops and were starving.

In the world's most fertile nation, the people were starving.

The UN brought tons of seeds: corn, wheat, soy ... everything they could think of. The people ate the seeds and didn't plant anything and continued to starve.

Any questions?

so what u might as well use that same analogy for people born in the US vs being born in the Congo

compensating for the one born into shit isnt gonna fix the original problem anyway

Money != wealth
Food is put on tables when people are useful

If you believe all people are equal, you're living proof that they aren't.

really is that why soo many lottery winners stay rich

Allowed?
Allowed by whom, exactly?

Why is it that leftists always wish to have others in power over them?

>"Doesn't feel right"

Why don't we also cut limbs off those of us who were fortunate to be born with all appendages intact? Why not poke out an eye to be in line with those who don't have two?

Seriously, life isn't equal, never has been and never will be, and we don't need to keep attempting to make the unequal come to the same point for a level playing field since it's impossible anyway.

Because it's the idealogy of children.

But ow, the edge.

No nigger, there's a difference. We already accepted that Jews own the world.
You keep thinking there's something you can do to change it.

Nailed it.

The left are babies. They want the police to protect them and nobody else can own guns.
They want the state to feed and house them and nobody else can own anything.

Babies.

Subsaharan Africa is a Malthusian nightmare, the niggers are destroying themselves ... and they will all come to Europe, while the Jews say "well it's only right, whites caused global warming" (overpopulation and land redistribution is killing them, climate is a drop in the bucket).

Their IQ is the problem.

yet if the tables were turned and you were the one with billions you would probably have a different view

I'm part of the 1%.

What should happen to me?

muh feelings

>incorrectly using ellipses

...

>>>/reddit/

>"worked harder" isn't the same as being born into wealth

No, it means that someone else worked harder to ensure that their descendants don't have to work as hard, you stupid burger. You do realize people care about their children and their children's children?

... So are you saying Communism doesnt work?
Cause I'm pretty sure thats the goal of communism, is equality and wealth distribution...

No. The problem with your line of thinking is that you probably believe the leftist, socialist scumbags when they say forcible wealth redistribution, market regulation and currency manipulation are the solution rather than the problem.

>good half of the population of this world struggle to put food on the table ?
They're all worthless niggers,poodians and chinks,they can starve and give the world back the oxygen they're wasting.

If they also want to be rich,start fucking working and being smart.
Wealth comes from work,richness comes from generations of smart people making smart choices at the right moment.
Commie tier nanny states are for lazy niggers and marxist westerners.

If we have to leave the stage, then lets play a game of global nuclear war before we do.

If you don't like billionaires, don't buy the shit they hustle. The only reason they have that much money is because stupid people are giving them that much money for shitty consumer goods.

Mmmm fuck, Coca Cola is so fucking delicious. Here take an entire hours worth of wages for a case.

Prove why you shouldn't be murdered, then I can make judgement.

Get a job

"that doesn't feel right" - shlomo de schecklestine right before raising rent on someone who does work that benefits society.

I believe there should be a restriction on personal wealth.

There were many smart economists who supported this, but it never got implemented, because of "muh freedom". It's just retarded really. No matter how wealthy you are, you rely on society to guard it and trade with you.

Allowed by the governments


You shouldn't protest when the government use taxes they collect from you to help poorer countries to develop

Someone owning more than you isn't morally wrong.

>most forms of free speech

>struggle to put food on the table
in first world countries, poverty is having an iphone 6 instead of 6s. who gives a fuck about 3rd world shitholes

Western nations have been throwing money and goods at poor areas for decades and they're still just as shitty as ever.

This user has the right of it. There are dozens of stories like this. The reality is that people have to help themselves, and making them your dependent does not do that.

African farmers can't compete with free UN food and are being driven out of business. Getting the GIB ME DATS out of there will be a boon to local entrepreneurs and intelligent people who can swoop in and start building a real society.

>I believe there should be a restriction on personal wealth.
>No matter how wealthy you are, you rely on society to guard it and trade with you.

If you want to restrict them, quit buying their shit.

communism obivouslty doesn't work, not everything left of unregulated free market is commmunism wtf is wrong with americans ?

>who gives a fuck about 3rd world shitholes

even if you're a racist shithead you should worry about the well being of 3rd world shitoles

namely africa, if no one helps them leave the state they're in they'll conitnue to have 6 babies per woman

The problem is that at a certain point wealth snowballs. Wealth begets power and power begets wealth.

You need to keep it sufficiently spread out such that no person gains too much power, otherwise we're back at feudalism/peonage/slavery.

Of course some want it that way.

You're aware that your "reasoning" didn't deserve more that the one post no one replied to ? you can stop now

3/4ths of billionaires are self made, faggot

Half of the population of this world struggle because they're not worthy. How fucking hard is it to build infrastructure and farm? A good deal of them have been living in less than poverty for generation upon generation going back hundreds of thousands of years. A better question is why anyone born in a nation whose ancestors established and maintained decent infrastructure should have to give a rat's ass about failed societies elsewhere?

>You shouldn't protest when the government use taxes they collect from you to help poorer countries to develop

Why should his money be used for something that will never benefit him?

Why do you feel the right to tell people what should be done with THEIR money?

It's isn't right, user. However there's nothing you can do about it, and I don't mean bad. Literally there's nothing anyone can do.

If we give money to poor people you'll just make more and more poor people.

It might sound edgy but in this world you either get good at working or you die. Anyone in hardship can come out if they think, work and take they right opportunities. That's freedom, you don't want rich people to take the poor by the hand and you don't want the poor to be dependent on the rich.

That's just how it is.

>Of course some want it that way.

Yo.

African farmers can't feed their own nation, their nation can't afford our food. We either give it to them and fuck their shitty farmers or starve them.

just because the individual didnt personally make all of his wealth doesnt invalidate the work his parents, grand parents did. They worked harder so their offspring wouldnt have to. Gonna complain about people whos parents paid for college now?

note: The idea here is to force people to invest, and redistribute wealth in the shape of higher wages, etc.

With the current system in place, a person can just hoard wealth and invest in low-risk assets, thus contributing nothing to society or the economy (which is what many people do).

Compare the ventures of a 150 mio. post-Paypal Elon Musk, and the current 150 bio. Apple ones, and you'll easily see what I mean. It's one of the many flaws of capitalism that could be circumvented by a simple law.

You don't understand economics. There's not a single owner to any major company. People are so diversified by now, anything you buy goes into the pockets of a some 3+ bio. net worth guy.

So if there's no science to do such a thing then your argument is pretty worthless aint it

Shalom.

Just remember kids, they already won.
politicsinn.com/48-percent-of-u-s-billionaires-are-jewish/

Rage against the machine. But they already own you regardless.

Just because I can.
SeeBRB, going to go shoot my AR15 in my backyard.

I think if we got the government out of business altogether these billionaires would be much more rare, many of them get that way because of how much they pay our government off so they can get unfair advantages in markets, if there was no middle man like a strong governments billionaires would be much more rare.

Perhaps starvation is ultimately less cruel. They breed wantonly and care little for the future. They are the source of their children's suffering.

Was going to let this slide, but quite frankly, this is my board.

that billionaire worked for that cash, that's what capitalism is, you work, you earn, you relax in the luxury you created -- that's what capitalism is.

what you want is socialism.

it isn't our job to give poor people money because they're too dumb/stupid to make money, those people are human filth, if they died they'd be better to society than if they lived and were parasites on the system.

go fuck yourself OP.

>invest
>contributing nothing to society or the economy
You just went full verzögern

Why should the money I earn be stolen from me?

I employ ~50 people

Ownership easily changes hands at the barrel of a gun. Until the have an army of ED-209s all they have is a measure of control, which could be wiped away at a moment's notice.

Half of the world is struggling to put food on its table because they killed all the whites in Rhodesia. Let them starve.

>its well known

[citation needed]

why should the government be concerned with aiding shit tier countries
ontop of that why should they use tax payers money for things that dont concern them

>own billions
it's all billions 'on paper'

you start a revolution, trying to take it, and all those billions will evaporate. What's left is a north korea like society.

If you earned your money through normal means then I cant fault you. Thieving money like the Jews deserves all their shekels stolen.

The way to a Jew is through his wallet.

>be retarded

>fuck girls left and right and have a ton of retarded kids

"Wow racist white people don't take care muh keeds WOWWWW"

...

Yes they should be, but as soon as they die a huge part of it should go to the state.

Their retarded spawn did nothing to earn it.

How does investing into low risk-assets contribute to society? It's basically just buying into already successful businesses so your money doesn't get eaten by inflation.

And those businesses themselves are again hoarding cash. It contributes nothing, really.

If his hard work consisted of buying politicians and civil servants to go from 8 to 9 digits on the dime of the taxpayer while providing no economic value, did he earn it then still?

>caring about niggers
>not understanding that being a billionaire is the promise of a hardworking capitalist citizen

If you're smart and you work hard you will eventually become a billionaire. Why would we remove this incentive so a few worthless niggers and arabs can eat a little better?

>jpg compressed at 0% quality
>117 KB
>starecat.com logo is perfect
This image is bantz

I guess those billions just came from nowhere.
Not owned by previous family,
not created by them,
not donated to them by supporters.

nah, guess it just fell of a plane flying to Afghanistan.

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

>because governments are so competent

Yeah, and your country has some of the highest unemployment rates and your people protest when anyone tries to bring it down.

Are you saying it's wrong for an Adult who works hard for himself to want to spend it on his offspring?

seriously, did you think about this at all?

>sorry son, you're 18 now which mean I'm kicking you out of the house until you find your own path in life. Come back when you want to make a business deal

And communism was created by kikes. Your point?