Is Breitbart a worthy source of information?

Is Breitbart a worthy source of information?

no they're just pandering to you fags to make money

Almost as bad as Drudge and Huffpost

what about gawker

It's not bad for a mainstream site, but there is a reason why we call it Kikebart.

Which is?

This.

Way too biased. The true answers are somewhere between all of the news sources combined, which is why I check all somewhat credible news sources multiple times a day.

>drudge
>news site

Way too biased.

It is biased so no.

Gawker is ded

It's a good source for citations. Just check their citations. And use that. Same for anything else.

>kikebart

...

Breitbart is pretty biased but they have their stories.

...

I don't think so but I like Milo. Its more entertainment than information

...

Good for laughs that's about it

Yuge kosher bias

...

all before shapiro left

...

Seems like the conservative version of Buzzfeed.

Their stories seem legit, but there is NO objectivity.

and my favorite

Salon.com is the only worthy source of information for me

how can you possibly put drudge and Huffington in the same sentence? drudge is a million times better than Huffington

Yes, we're all glad shapiro left. But let's talk about the site of today.

salon.com is the only news source i find worthy

>today
it's Milo...and if you think Breibart is not Pro Jew you should kill yourself

Somewhat credible?

Like MSN/CBS/CNN?

What the fuck news source isn't biased these days?

I'd really like you cum gargling faggots to say what you read.

Know why you won't? You're too afraid that everyone will gang up on you and tell you what a little brainwashed homo you are.

Media is balkanized. Trying to find a truly honest publication is like trying to find a hooker that will actually love you.

>Says a dude who is circimsized.

It's called pulling back the foreskin. Fuck Milo. Chances are, you can lose your dick in a circumcision.

Its not bad. Just beware of clickbait.

>What the fuck news source isn't biased these days?

Sup Forums

:^)

Areitbart Creitdart Ereitfart Greithart Ireitjart Kreitlart Mreitnart Oreitpart Qreitrart Sreittart Ureitvart Wreitxart Yreitzart

everything but milo is pretty golden. some of the background noise articles are good. milo is an overbearing faggot and breitbart needs to tell him to be more businesslike if he wants to keep flying around the country giving speeches

Nobody is taking the bait

>((Breitbart))
What do you think?

fuck you andrew breitbart was based

*coughcough*
>FRAUD

Yes like 7-6/10
As a conservative/libertarian I have no much to complain about.

Drudge links news articles you stupid spook

Huff is literally cancer. I would give that shit like 3/10 and I am being merciful.

>tfw you have no feeling in literally half your dick from your circumcision
I dont think hair ought to be growing on my shaft either

>any form of news
>worthy source of information
These things are mutually exclusive.

>druggy man
>worthy source of information

Drudge has been my main news source since Bill "Fat Chick Magnet" Clinton was busted for Lewinsky.

Since Trump I have used Breitbart daily.

Andrew Breitbart actually helped set up Huffpost which was created to be a progressive Drudge.

I like to think "progressives" now see the HPo/TMP/Salon/MotherJones/Crooks&Liars for what they are now.

Yeah, throw in AJ+, Mic, Mother Jones, NowThis, Buzzfeed, and Gawker (Probably the worst of all, now gone thank god) with that.

I forgot Salon, good god, next to Gawker that was literally the worst sack of excrement for "news".