Fascism
>a collectivist ideology centered around a strong national identity and a strong leader
>internally and externally led to the deaths of millions during the 20th century
Communism
>a collectivist ideology centered around a strong working class identity and (in practice) a strong leader
>internally and externally led to the deaths of millions during the 20th century
Why is one of these considered 'bad' and the other 'good' by contemporary Westerners?
Other urls found in this thread:
ub.edu
townhall.com
jstor.org
mises.org
youtu.be
mises.org
youtube.com
remember.org
twitter.com
your premise is not worthy of a response.
By the way communism is shit.
Neither is generally considered good in the West.
You're one very confused 13 year old kid, I'm not going to do your parent's work, go ask them why you're wrong and how they managed to make you this retarded. Good luck, you're oging to need it.
What is incorrect about the premise?
Fascism is about reinforcing traditional institutions while holding them accountable to the nation/proles. Communism is about destroying traditional institutions and replacing them with communist bureaucrats. Communist bureaucrats have been in control of Western academia, education, and media for about a half-century now. QED.
>time for the daily Left = Right shill thread
gay, saged
Just read Mein Kampf ch. 11, vol. 1
Or read the communist manifesto.
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
-- Adolf Hitler 1938
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu
>townhall.com
>jstor.org
>mises.org
youtu.be
Cos the nazis lost the war and couldn't frame the postwar debate about why it was fought you dumb fuck
Have the commies and left tards come up with an airtight, defensible explanation for the Stalin purges yet?
>Uncle Adolph redefining what socialism means to suit his own political purposes
>An argument
To win against the Jew, you appropriate his weapons.
>redefine socialism to = Germanism
It was the most genius semantic juijutsu the right wing has ever seen.
Cucked little faggot.
;^)
>collectivist
>collectivist
Ayn Rand is one hell of a drug, kid. But keep your head up, you'll be able to finish high school, even if it takes you 5 years.
No, they just ignore it, the way the right wing ignores any ties to Hitler (generally speaking)
Is there a audio reading of mein kampf around with a comfy voice such as this one ?
...
Nice try, putting Hitler next to Stalin.
Your negative conditioning isn't going to work, psyops bastards.
Here is some positive conditioning to undo the negative conditioning, you dumb fucks!
One killed a lot of people, but shouldn't have.
The other didn't kill a lot of people, but should have.
Posting this man against what I posted is the most ironic thing I have ever seen on Sup Forums. I used to be libertarian and now I am a nationalist. He used to be libertarian and now is nationalist. You posted him to attack my anti-libertarian post.
...
Fascists killed communists and jews. Communists did not. That's why.
> Fascists killed communists and jews. Communists did not. That's why.
A word puzzle. Nice.
Solution:
Communists killed fascists and jews. Fascists did not. That's why.
Who is that handsome man on the right?
The ideology of having a strong national identity does not warrant death.
"Right-wing totalitarian movements have generally drawn their popular support primarily from middle classes seeking to maintain the economic and social status quo. Left-wing totalitarianism has often developed from working class movements seeking, in theory, to eliminate, not preserve, class distinctions."
remember.org