>search for "(movie) plotholes"
There, whatever your 9/10 masterpiece is, it's now 3/10 at best.
>search for "(movie) plotholes"
There, whatever your 9/10 masterpiece is, it's now 3/10 at best.
>nitpicking
>actual criticism
Pick one.
why does he have three hands?
because the "artist" is shit at drawing motion and had to cop out
If you watch films where "plotholes" actually matter you have not evolved to watching KINO yet
>watch a historical movie
>like it
>watch a review by an actual historian that tears it to shreds
>I didn't like it after all
Your existence is 3/10 at best.
Which is it
white house down
>Search [Movie] plotholes
>nothing but continuity errors
>thinly veiled PLEASE LIKE ROGUE ONE THREAD
nope, still a shit flick
Name a plothole in Batman v Superman.
Protip: you can't
lex luther has the city's admiration but is a pasty little weirdo with a weird haircut
rejected.
next.
What?
MARTHA
>Having a functional plot is nitpicking
Watched Oceans 11 yesterday and thought this pretty often. It was entertaining and had some great cast and "fun" but you really have to turn your brain off. Too many questions and the movie sort of just falls apart.
you're just stupid
I bet you enjoy the films of Wes Anderson
the problem with plotholes is everybody who tries to find them always assumes that the characters are meant to be soulless automatons acting purely based on strict logic and statistics
Braveheart?
I watched oceans 12 this morning and Jesus what a fucking trainwreck