ITT: honesty in filmmaking

ITT: honesty in filmmaking

Wrong.

Right.

...

You posted the wrong pic

La La Land is easily the best example of Psuedo-Cinema this decade. Of course it will sweep awards like it was made to.

SPRING BREAKERS
ONLY GOD FORGIVES
UNDER THE SKIN

psuedo... soundin a lot more like you rite about now, shrimp-for-dick. talkin loud sayin nothing. come back when you've got an original thought or two. makes me laugh, how devoid of ideas you are. intellectually barren gut-reacting reject. no ones paying attention to your schoolyard shit-flinging in this debate, i'm afraid. sad shitbag, i shudder in disgust at your inferiority.

Multiple device samefag korinefag

Does he have the shittiest taste on the board?

Does he have curable autism?

>no leviathan
Go fuck yourself.

La la land is dishonest filmmaking.
Fpbp

Are you schizophrenic?

I don't even like Korine

What did the mentally ill child mean by this?

Of course you do nice pretending though. Everyone knows youe schtick

>La La Land
>Not an imdb pandering piece of shit.
I did NOT go to films I went to flicks

>korinefag gets called out for being a jew
>immediately damage controls as a detective
>please I'm not a jew
LOVING

Why are La La Land fags so salty?

I hate la la land

>diaz most casual pleb friendly flick
>ceylan at all
>not even hongs best film released this decade
Is that you Quentin?

Speing Breakers is shit.

Wow, anti-korine spammer has the worst autism i've seen in a while.

There's no Trash Humpers or Cosmopolis, that's not him

Cry more

>disses ceylan and includes spring breakers and silence

fuck this board is literally the worst

>tfw you coined the name Korinefag
>tfw people are misusing it now

He has a very specific posting style, for one he never posts any images
He's also an autistic NEET who apparently used the site for almost 10 years

>jerking armond white
you could probably change that one now since every retard is doing it again now

Also Korinefag doesn't have such massive hatred for Harry Potter, he gets most triggered by PTA, Tarantino, Nolan and Villeneuve

I understand that the movie was intended to be a throwback to movies from the 50s with the dancing and singing and classy outfits and that, but I thought it's goal was to modernize that genre.
It succeeded for me mostly on the front of showing the reality of the true love/following your dreams balance and how one seems to come up short if one pursues either of these fully.
Yet, if this was meant to be a modernist version of the 50s musical comedy film, why didn't they update the archetype of the female?
It seems like every step of the way, in order to succeed or truly follow her dreams, Mia needs Sebastian's help or advice. Sebastian is the one who reminds her of her roots in writing and encourages her to write the one-woman show. Then when she's given up all hope on her acting career, it's Sebastian in his vintage convertible (white horse) that rides up to her childhood home to convince her of her talent and worth. He's also the person that has to keep reaffirming her self-confidence. Throughout the whole movie, Mia is so delicate and fragile.
Anyway, knowing that there are little girls and teens out there that will see this movie and look up to Mia, I just don't think Hollywood needed to make another female character like this.
Can anyone shed light on any positive or progressive characteristics in Mia's character?

Prepare for the shitstorm

I loved Winter Sleep but i think Anatolia was better desu. It felt more satisfying at the end.


That scene with the girl bringing tea is GOAT KINO

What does that even mean?

Thays the user I was talking he uses that language all the time. He hasn't had a friend in ten years.

>every time I like something going in blind tv hates it

I want this meme too stop

You really shouldn't like this trash

la la land was just ok. the fact that it swept the globes just means there wasn't enough good movies this year

Explain why it's trash without using the word honesty or dishonesty

It isn't written well, has forgettable numbers and is the definition of a safe oscarbait. Lack originality and was tailored to make the masses who like crap think its sincere. No spice, soulless film

Sup Forums is full of morons. they hated hail, caesar! and unironically like Donnie Darko and most of them probably jerk off to anime porn

this place can be fun for the memes but you really should not take any opinions seriously

I took my girlfriend to this and she didn't like it. If that doesn't turn you away nothing will.

MASSIVE SPOILERS BELOW
Gosling does everything he can to make her famous. At the end, Gosling is the reason Stone becomes a superstar, and they tell eachother they will love one another forever, but Stone has to go to France for a few months. Cut to 5 years later, and Stone is married to someone else with a child. She sees him playing in his club and gets a bit sad. That's the fucking ending of this film. What in the actual fuck.

The reason it sucked so bad is that they made the characters to nice and romantic, so when it came for conflict to be added to the movie, their actions just didn't make sense. SPOILERS AGAIN
like when Gosling misses Stones theatre performance to do a photo shoot, it completely goes against his character and the actions only happened because they needed to add conflict

And the fact that whenever he did something good, she seemed to treat him like shit. Girls don't need that kind of character as a role model.

>complains he has no job - becomes famous musician overnight making fat stacks
>complains he doesn't see her enough - makes every effort in the world to see her
>complains that he isn't following his dreams - he follows his dreams
>dumps him and marries another dude

worst character of 2016 confirmed

Emma watson was chosed by chazelle and dropped out of it likely after she read the script. Truly based in my eyes

Explain this meem plz

...

Thank God we were spared from Emma Watson ruining this movie

Based as fuck. Emma Stone was shit in it as well.

Dishonest filmmaking/filmmakers (Tarantino, Wes Anderson, Christopher Nolan, Alex Garland, Paul Thomas Anderson, Nicholas Refn, Tyler Perry, Rian Johnson, Alfonso Cuaron, Noah Baumbach, Edgar Wright, Andrea Arnold, David Yates, Denis Vilenueve, Duncan Jones, James Franco, Steve McQueen) a these intellectually bankrupt moral whores and charlatans; their films often appeal to the modern phenomenon of the 'Pretend Epic' resulting in people claim "It was a movie that thought it was a film" they have no ideas of their own and are filmed purely to have fancy essays made about them. They obfuscate their lack of insight under a smug impenetrable irony and often contain scenes with laughable bad attempts at depth with characters spouting platitudes that the director takes VERY seriously.
They leech the greater works that preceded it; for example The Enemy basically being a rip off of Eraser head, but have nothing else to say, yet so often act under the guise of deconstruction, they often have very weak 'social commentary' and features a quirky forgetteable score to be 'innovative'.
These directors are hacks and will be forgotten to time.

Some of Earnest Filmmaking include, but are not limited to

>Mike Leigh
>Charlie Kaufman
>The Coen Brothers
>Werner Herzog
>James Cameron
>Mel Gibson
>Terrence Malick
>Gaspar Noe
>George Miller

>Best emma drops poorly written oscarbait
>people are forced to sit though the torture of the frogs same acting and the films praise exposes redditors
/ourgirl/

>pseudo-cinema

is this what autism look like

Good call

seems odd to me that a musical is getting this much praise when the lead actors cant sing for shit

FORCED MEME

@78306133
how many terrible pastas can this man make

People have shit taste especially stonefags considering they put up with an uggo

>They obfuscate their lack of insight under a smug impenetrable irony
So like you and every other Armond White wannabe on here?

Thats what makes it so good and upsets the guy constantly samefagging about Emma Watson being "based" right now.

>Mike Leigh
Naked is one of the most dishonest films ever made.

nice, I wouldnt want her to be in this shitflick

Am i honest Sup Forums ?

A poor mans Tarkovsky

Emma Stone was so bad in this and the las twoody film

Is that a Yes or a No?

Sorry, how is Edgar Wright dishonest? Pretty heart on the sleeve movies

no.

Autism pasta man is always right

Edgar Wright is the classic example of Sup Forums 'turn everything into a meme' sensibility