$157 million worldwide

Haha wow.

Seriously though, why did it flop?

Same reason Trump got elected

>$157 million
>flop

Because Amy Adams is over the hill

>3x its budget
>flop

its a sci-fi movie that has an ounce of intelligence to it

the only sci-fi movies that do well these days are children's movies like star wars and guardians

It's an original property

>from the king of faux cinèma
wew, ville not sure if that's very flattering

It's not capeshit, Star Wars or an animation.

It has a pretty fucking retarded plot
If you've read Watchmen before, the whole point of this movie is basically already crystal clear for you and why someone would dedicate 2 hours explaining something that Alan Moore did in 10 pages in beyond ne.

Moana made well over 3 times its budget and it's still considered a massive flop.

Rule for retards

WW < Production budget -> BOMB
WW < 2x Production Bugdert -> cover costs but probably lost money on marketing
WW < 3x PB -> grey area, but mostly did OK
WW > 3 x PB -> hit

eat shit nigger

It was over sentimental garbage.

Disney spend money on marketing like it's the end of the world, this is different

Torrent when?

>Moana
>marketing

There were almost no ads for it.

>Disney
>no marketing

One hundred millions at least, unless you watch children morning cartoons you wouldn't know if there were ads or not

people are done watching movies when every other form of enternainment surpasses it, and for a bigger longevity

It only cost $47m to make.

I wouldn't call that a flop.

The electoral college?

No kids I talked to said they even knew it was out. And I talk to a lot of kids.

>fantasy is sci-fi

I saw Hacksaw Ridge (9/10), Rogue One (0/10), Passengers (5/10) instead.

Arrival didn't interest me at all. Linguistics and time is a flat circle makes for prime downloadkino.

>And I talk to a lot of kids.
What did he mean by this?