Which is better

I choose OKC as well but it is quite close though. Both are overrated mellow indie pop rock albums from the 90s. It's just that one is considered better because it's a tiny bit more alternative.

>mellow
It's considered better because it's the best, pham

What's the Story is once generic rock with the same basic 4chord verse-chorus structure. OKC at least attempts to do a lot of interesting things in terms of sound and songwriting. It's really not even close. OKC is a much more solid album which still manages to sound somewhat fresh but the Oasis album sounds dated as fuck.

Since both bands became completely irrelevant after those albums, I'd say they're equal.

Left is one of the best albums ever made. Right is boring mid-to-slow tempo shit with no memorable melodies.
>mellow indie pop rock albums
t. only heard Wonderwall and Champagne Supernova

>boring
>tempo even being a criticism
>no memorable melodies
yowzer

oasis is just radiohead if they only released creep lmao. aside from wonderwall (a literal meme), they're completely irrelevant outside the uk

>they're completely irrelevant outside the uk
ok

Colossal anthems for blokes versus soycore for cucks. Idk op, you tell me.

typical fucking soyboy reddithead fan with zero knowledge of music. i'd take the arpeggio in wonderwall over radioshart's entire discogrphy tbqh

>""""""interesting""""""
a word for clueless faggots

Better how?

OKC is more enjoyable personally but that isn't objective at all I'll grant. It certainly still holds up, it's timeless whereas anything by Oasis sounds pretty distinctively like the time and place it came from.

OKC is somewhat experimental, it's not completely out there and still has a lot of "catchy" tracks but at least they're trying things out.
I get that you know all this and are just trying to bait people, but I'm bored and there may be people who have never given radiohead a try becasue of these stupid threads we have hourly it seems now, and they're missing out.