The instruments drop in and out, there are solos, and outside of solo cadenzas the keyboard basically provides rhythm for the strings and wind.
Asher Lee
How come some composers just SOUND so good?
Any normie can tell you that Albinoni is more aesthetically pleasing than Bach, Mozart than Haydn, Mahler than Bruckner, Puccini than Verdi. But why is this? Aesthetic appeal seems to rarely overlap with the kinds of elements composers and theoreticians study.
Is there any decent writing on aesthetics?
John Edwards
Theodor Adorno wrote hundreds of musical essays on almost all classical composers. These writings are beyond decent, beyond brilliant even. Here is an essay on Schubert he wrote. Have fun and good luck scribd.com/document/66885695/Adorno-Schubert-1926
Communist countries contributed disproportionately to the 20th century musical canon. Since the fall of communism, nothing noteworthy has come out of Eastern Europe except Penderecki and Gubaidulina, both of whom peaked before 1990.
>is heavily into marxist literature >is a commie >loves modernist composers and disdain common pratice composers >gets buttblasted when niggers are put in their place
chevalier is, i've heard coleridge-taylor is good from ppl i respect but i don't like this
David Harris
Yes, he's definately a sperg but the upside is that you know you can send him as well as countless more modernist drones into a raging autistic fit just one well-inserted abasement of Soystakovich.
