14 seconds into this and they are already using Hedwig's theme

14 seconds into this and they are already using Hedwig's theme

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=55G5zyda7qg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I want to fuck the ass of the girl in the hufflepuff scarf

Wait, only Redmayne is wearing a Hufflepuff scarf. What did you mean by this?

Remember when the Nazgul theme was on the soundtrack listing for the Hobbit and in an interview Howard Shore promised that it wasn't just a lazy nostalgia grab and it made narrative sense and then when the movie came out it played in the final Thorin vs. Azog fight and it was just a lazy nostalgia grab and it made no narrative sense?

He means he's a massive faggot and Rednayne is butt ugly.

This movie was pretty shit.

Fantastic Beasts themselves were disappointing.

Characters were boring, didn't even catch most of their names.

Some of the lore was a bit rekt

Plot was nonsensical and hard to follow, which is ironic considering how basal it was.

also the theme literally only plays for the warner bros logo you fucking retard

Hedwig had a theme?

Who the hell is Hedwig?

>tfwyn have a threesome with wizard sisters

I looked up on YouTube, it didn't play during the Thorin vs Azog fight.

What did you expect from the mind that brought you one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody; just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

I thought you died you were sleepin tho huh

But it does

youtube.com/watch?v=55G5zyda7qg

Damn, I thought you were talking about THE final battle in BotFA.

Fantastic Beasts is the perfect example of the modern Hollywood movie. It casts the hit Hollywood star of the minute and it's loosely connected to a wildly successful franchise. This movie was made for the sole purpose of making money. There is no other reason. Rowling, Yates, the actors, everyone... all in it for the money.

It's easy to imagine the pre-production meetings... You know, that cute tree in Guardians of the Galaxy was really popular among audiences, let's have one of those. And people really liked that dive bar with lots of goofy creatures and fun music in Star Wars, let's have one of those too. It's frustrating when I hear people call this film imaginative. There's a reason all the fantastic beasts look so cute. Because toys.

Yet again we see Eddie Redmayne overact, taking the role of "autistic British wizard" to a level not needed. There was no chemistry between any of the actors, which made for awkward moments throughout the whole 2+ hours runtime. The relationship between Colin Ferrell and Ezra Miller especially seems unintentionally predatory.

There are two completely separate plots that are sloppily connected. One of the plots is pushed so hard and is used only to create a franchise of this thing. If they focused on only the fantastic beasts instead of the bizarre possessed horror aspect with a cheap twist, the film might not have been half bad.

In the end, yet again, almost a whole city gets destroyed in the climax. By now it is beyond tiring and by my count that is how FOUR big budget movies have ended in 2016. And by what, a fucking dark cloud. The whole film, each and every scene, is predictable, features terrible CGI, obvious blue screen, lifeless sound stages, and is riddled with plot holes.

ehh needs work.

Lol it's just a testament to these wonderful films that two out of three of them have the exact same climax. Lot of great plot progression here PJ.

AM I FITTING IN YET?

>Fantastic Beasts is the perfect example of the modern Hollywood movie. It casts the hit Hollywood star of the minute and it's loosely connected to a wildly successful franchise. This movie was made for the sole purpose of making money. There is no other reason. Rowling, Yates, the actors, everyone... all in it for the money.

Don't forget pushing racemixing propaganda.

I remember one line where Eddie Redmayne says "you have such uncivilized laws here, like how we're not allowed to breed or marry with them (muggles)", which served absolutely no purpose in the plot and the entire little scene was added for no other reason than pushing a (((certain agenda))).

The main Harry Potter movies had some of this too, but I don't recall ever being hit over the head with this out of the blue, preachy marxist horseshit.

No you should be on imdb or tumblr for liking such anti art trash.

Kys fedora pleb

>and Rednayne is butt ugly.

Take that back, faggot.

>we're not allowed to breed or marry with them (muggles)", which served absolutely no purpose in the plot

cept queenie wanted the no-maj dick and vicariously got it in the end. how was it not plot-related?

You're responding seriously to a post that centers around "racemixing propaganda" and features an MS Paint comic about LE JEWZ....

Go back to Sup Forums or YouTube, low iq

...

See
Fedora pasta autist

Kanye West

See Why are you still here? I told you to go back to Sup Forums or YouTube.

>faggot

no u

AUTISM

>cept queenie wanted the no-maj dick and vicariously got it in the end. how was it not plot-related?

This was before that part. They just through that in there for the sake of it. And even later on it doesn't actually help or advance the plot at all, it's not of value in telling the story, it's judaism.

>main love interest is not as feminine or pretty as the main character

Who is this chick and why is she getting so much work lately?

She's Jack McCoy's daughter and I have no problem with her. I agree she's not great looking but she was really likeable in Fantastic Beasts and played her part perfectly in Inherent Vice.

I'm excited to see what she does as the Ripley in the Alien

Harry's faggy owl I think.

There was that one scene where he shouts HEDWIG or something.

i'm not even into traps but this guy is a passable cute woman

I want to fuck her in the ass and whip her to submission.

>I want to fuck her in the ass

Not surprising since she already looks like a dude. It'd be less gay to fuck Redmayne than her senpai.

I want her to fuck me in the ass and whip me to submission

That's better.