Why did punk/post punk age so much better than everything else from the 70s? It still sounds modern while stuff like disco, hard rock, etc. sounds extremely dated
Why did punk/post punk age so much better than everything else from the 70s...
Easton Lewis
Other urls found in this thread:
Gavin Lewis
you like post punk because post punk was white dudes with guitars who shamelessly stole dub and disco from PoC and Queers while rebranding it as omg so experimental
Tyler Sanders
Quiet now, young one.
John Taylor
wasted trips
Eli Torres
I'd agree with you if what they stole from didn't age so poorly. And by the looks of the AIDS epidemic those poc and queers didn't age too well either
Hunter Hill
bait
I wouldn't say it sounds "modern" but post-punk and punk bands were rejecting the 70s tropes in the process of creating their genres, so their music feels less tied to a certain era than the rest of the stuff that was part of trends does.
Leo Anderson
A lot of disco sounds fine still
>race makes the music good or bad
Hudson Scott
bitch shut up
based
Dylan Young
BAIT
Easton Gonzalez
This isn't true at all. In fact i would argue that the majority of post-punk didn't age well at all because the more experimental shit ended up just being a stepping stone for other forms of music to be made later while the main stuff all wasn't very consistent on an album level, usually having one or two great tracks with a lot of filler. The only real exception to all this, if it even counts as post-punk (it doesn't,) is Marquee Moon. Based on relevancy alone I would easily say that Zeppelin and Floyd's 70s material aged better.