>first and second: the UK signature updates like normal from 354,634 to 365,483 in 5 hours >second and third: in less than 2 hours and the number exploded from 365,483 to 2,401,768 from the UK
>"but OP, this could be a conspiracy theory and 2.1 million really did sign in 2 hours."
Allowing the people another vote is true democracy.
Luke Cook
Bump, Anything I can do? I'm shit at front-end and cannot use my domains, but if you need any data science, do tell
Evan Phillips
Nah, it's not true democracy until you allow a third vote.
Leo Wright
Bump
Grayson Perry
It's true democracy when the outcome changes after at most 10 votes
Ryder Robinson
I think they should have a referendum every morning.
Daniel Carter
Bump
Lucas Collins
wait. wtf is going on?
I thought the brexit vote was to leave.
Are you saying now liberals are saying "oh wait, we need another vote to change this?"
what bullshit is this? Are we going to vote till they get what they want and then "sorry, the people voted"?
Connor Hughes
Cameron himself said, if the UK voted to remain, there would NOT be a second referendum, so why do the rules change if they vote leave?
Ryder Murphy
lmao is that the angry nyc violin midget or whatever
Chase Russell
Let's hope it exceeds the UK population.
Jack Walker
Yes it's doug
Liam Bennett
Exactly the EU will force them to vote again and again until they vote how the EU wants. Then it is settled for good, no need for another pointless vote.
Samuel Williams
Because feelings, user. Alot of people were very upset about not being under a corrupt superstate anymore.
Michael Bell
Here's my accounting for all time points and the most current data.
Personally I don't think the file was edited since Line 9 is consistently around 30000. This is important since it takes the displayed vote and compares it to the number of votes in both the constituent part and the by country part of the file.
If we were to see some editing, it should jump significantly somewhere, which it doesn't.
However, that does not discount the possibility of foreign IP's (bots).
Info about the JSON file: There are two parts: >Votes by country This does not seem to be updated as fast, possibly since they're trying to screen out possible fraudulent votes.
>Votes by constituency This part tends to be updated more frequently, probably because the constituency is determined by a zip code which is asked for in the petition signing page.
Are you kidding me guys? Its a shitty online petition a bunch of Too High to Vote Millennials wiped off their lazy cheetoe stained fingers off their cum rags then typed out and voted for.
Nobody is going to take this seriously.I mean God bless you for doing this as only Sup Forums would and keep it up but I am just saying.
Liam James
BUMP. Which channels are you using to spread this info?
Asher Jenkins
are you the guy from the other thread? also why would the minimal change in line 9 be a surprise? its total votes minus constiuency and non-uk, why would that prove editing false?
Hunter Lewis
This. The poll is normal behavior by people in denial that this happened, and will happen. Expect the full seven stages of acceptance to play out over the next couple weeks. This is anger & denial.
>"These results aren't legitimate, we need another vote!"
John Allen
This smells like Florida
Brody Foster
There were several threads on this already where people were posting a bot file here that someone made on infinity chan and people were using it in the threads and stacking votes. They put Vatican City, and other places with low populations to have like 30,000 votes when they only have populations of 4-500 people. Hundreds of thousands of votes were added with the bots throughout the course of one thread hitting post limit, and it went on for multiple threads and had been going on before I started watching the threads.
It's rigged as hell m8, thank the chans for doing it.
Ethan Diaz
I spent forever looking for this. You're welcome.
Colton Barnes
Requesting the image of the book page stating "Never take no as an answer" with the european countries which voted out of the EU but were ignored
>Who's got their hand in the cookie-jar Sup Forums?
I wonder
Joseph Parker
ANAL - YTICS
Angel Mitchell
There won't be a second vote, retards.
It's a referendum. Not a neverendum.
Bentley Butler
cucks are assblasted praise kek
Thomas Sanders
>Requesting the image of the book page stating "Never take no as an answer" with the european countries which voted out of the EU but were ignored Come oooon...
Charles Fisher
If you care about brexit, you probably shouldn't until you have an ironclad case. Perhaps it would be better to approach this from a "foreign voters" angle rather than an editing conspiracy.
Yes I was in that thread, but no I was not that poster.
I think a minimal change in line 9 proves it's not edited* because it it were edited, we should see a jump at some point since they would probably adjust the displayed vote count which would cause a step up after some timepoint.
On the other hand, if you compare Line 8 (Sum of all votes by country) and Line 3 (Total count displayed), you can see that there is a sudden drop after 21:21.
I don't think this is evidence of malicious editing since last thread someone said that whatever service is editing the by country counts is updating the UK number slower than for other countries since they saw places like Vatican increase in realtime while the UK count lagged. Not to mention the fact that this number keeps declining shows that the service is in fact catching up to current data.
Jeremiah Brooks
...
Cooper Flores
What did you use to make that?
Juan Gray
bump
Mason Edwards
Well hopefully they keep it up until it exceeds the population of the UK.
Cooper Edwards
...
Jordan Reyes
This is good, have you sent it to anyone/ news site?
Nicholas Jenkins
But we have the proof for the editing, don't we? And now the JSONs have been corrected, that would be the main point to bring on
Nolan Gray
This is excellent news. We've caught the shills red handed and they absolutely know it.
Charles Taylor
Thank you and RARE. How's the weather there, little virgin? How did people take the brexit?
James Lee
Didn't they already have a petition where millions voted leave?
Jaxson Carter
Make a video on it.
Charles Gonzalez
ehehehe
Louise Mensch, by the way, is a vocal Leave campaigner.
Dominic Gray
What do you define "editing" as?
I thought it meant either outright changing a number on the JSON file (which would be obvious and difficult to keep consistent due to the many categories) or adding an arbitrary constant to the counting program which should show a huge spike at some point.
If you mean just pointing a bunch of bots at the page, then that's its own thing altogether.
Eli Davis
I can't seem to find the source of the book. Any clue?
Adam Reed
to note, the line 8 - line 1 count seems to be fairly consistent. The only number that jumps significant is the gb votes in country, but I assume only the constituency votes are counted, right?
>The total of this column does not equal the total number of votes in the e-petition. Not sure if this is issue #437 ( #437 ) coming back again.
replied
>Hi @xjpeter,
>We've temporarily disabled the signatures by country for the UK because of the high load we're experiencing on that petition. That said, the number was woefully out of date so I've run a one off calculation for that petition to update it and the figures are closer to the truth now. It'll continue to drift as time goes on, but we hope to re-enable the live count when load dies down.
>Cheers,
>Murray
And then Murray commits some changes. Since OP didn't include time zone information it's hard to line this information up
Brandon Smith
I may be stupid enough to not understand the unconsistency on the JSON case. Care to explain? You mean like making some excuse up about "latency"?
The counter for British votes on the UK section always lagged behind the sum of votes in the constituency section (and by extension the number of votes displayed).
In the last thread we thought that it was because they were scrutinizing the UK votes since they were the most "important", but this seems to explain why.
The constituency count vote seems to be updated in real time since the numbers are split into district by postal codes which are self-reported so they are instantly available and not filtered for now.
Jordan Rivera
WHO CARES H O
C A R E S
Brexit won, it's over.
Hudson Garcia
Bump with merchants
Adam Cooper
Thank you a bunch. 2$ for info that should have been free at day 1. What a prick this Hannan is...
I understand. I'm off to work, but will give a look here from time to time
Josiah Mitchell
Wait, I just thought of something: If the constituency count is updated in real time (self-reported) while the by country count is not, then it would be nearly impossible to tell how many foreign/bot votes there are since there is no good reference point to compare each count to.
Colton Jackson
Bump
Nathan Thomas
What? Petition fraud you say? Impossibru
Oliver Anderson
share script lad
Nathaniel Reed
>it would be nearly impossible to tell how many foreign/bot votes there are no, it should be manifestly obvious in many cases.
Just replace the url with any .JSON from any UK parliament petition
Right now the stats are as follows: Total number of signatures: 3017197 Sum of all signatures by country: 2587514 Number of signatures from United Kingdom: 2401768
So 92% of signatures have come from the UK based on the sum of all signatures by country.
Nathaniel Cook
kek
Isaac Green
Make it six... million.
Carson Taylor
Actually I made this, hello bro
Adam Jones
>Nooo, the first time doesn't count, doesn't count!! >Another referendum please, we don't like the results of this one.
Is this how referendums supposed to work?
Liam Allen
So basically they just turned all foreign bot votes into UK votes?
Cameron Williams
...
Parker Martin
No, they just updated the number of votes per country.
Luis Gray
Why people don't read the thread... People should read the thread don't you agree NhMFfciV?
Dominic Fisher
We know it's a fraud guy. Faggots have been here on Sup Forums openly boasting about using bots to add votes.
