JUST

JUST
In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a double-digit lead
washingtonpost.com/politics/in-new-poll-support-for-trump-plunges-giving-clinton-a-double-digit-lead/2016/06/25/0565bef6-3a31-11e6-a254-2b336e293a3c_story.html

Other urls found in this thread:

thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/trump-trumps-wins-historic-race-record-fashion
jihadwatch.org/2016/06/idaho-muslim-migrant-sex-assault-case-obama-appointed-prosecutor-threatens-community
heatst.com/uk/exclusive-brexit-2nd-referendum-petition-a-4-chan-prank-bbc-report-it-as-real/
archive.is/FhvRb
twitter.com/AnonBabble

trucks on suicide watch

TrumDumpsters hair on fire!

#PilloryforHillary

>support just disappearing with no news or controversy

absolutely no one is buying this shit

This is the natural course for all forced memes.

thank goodness the polls are so reliable, just like they accurately predicted Brexit failing

...

I'm fine with all this polling, however, it just seems extremely biased as in some constructed mass media narrative to (in one way that has YET to completely fail) crash his campaign. (with limited survivors)

If you look at the sampling methodology on aggregate sites like RCP that also give raw/source data, they all disproportionately poll democrats and independents by a large margin, I mean.......maybe it's reality or something close to it, I'm just skeptical.

Brexit showed us how valuable polling is.

At the very least, I'm sure we can all agree nothing really means anything until the debates, they will be a fuckin bloodbath.

EL JUSTO

Shitty poll.

Polling offers near trash levels of insight in many instances, however, "polling" is a very effective thought control tool.

>Trump
>No controversy
Okay you literally have to be joking.

not an argument

manafort will come up with some atwater styled polls soon

Not argueing.
Just stating that saying Trump isn't controversial is either a joke or whoever said it is a complete fucking retard and should literally kill them self today. Like within the hour.

Numbers will go back up once he starts bringing the bantz again. He's recharging.

Just need a debate with both of them up there and she's toast

THERE

ARE

MORE

DEMOCRATS

THAN

REPUBLICANS

LOOK UP VOTER REGISTRATION

>Washington post

>believing the Washington Post

there are more independents than any one as well m8 yet their under sampling them aswell?

want to try again?

Turnout has been significantly lower at the democratic primaries, while turnout has been higher at the republican primaries. No doubt this election will see a record turnout for republicans while democrats stay home assuming Hillary has it in the bag. I also can't wait for the debates.

even more telling republican voter turn out beat democratic turn out m8

(((Washington Post)))

People aren't stupid, Trump don't know what to do....

washington post

wew and s a g e

When is the first debate supposed to happen? I don't give a shit about any polls until the debates start happening.

What a losing hand.

>Mexican judge comments
>Trump gloating that he knew Orlando would happen right after the attack
>Campaign ousts Cory
>Trump is spending $0 on ads or any sort of campaign in swing states
>He's pouring money into his own businesses
>Do I even need to continue

>1 post by this ID

>""""""""""""""""""""Washington""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Post""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
they are banned though

Boy, it's almost like he doesn't even want to be president and is just using this campaign for attention and exposure.

There's no need to continue, we already can see you're a shill or troll.

>leftists in charge of polls
>polls slanted towards their candidate
>leftists worriedly say, "l-look goyim, we're w-winning"

I just honestly don't understand why anyone wants Hillary to be President.

Her entire career has been nothing but a mediocre performance as a politician and near endless scandals and suspicious activity that even her most fervent supporters can't deny.

Her only two accomplishments are being the wife of Bill Clinton and being a woman. That's it. She has no charisma, no intellect, no experience, no anything. She's literally a thug and dynasty politician aiming for more influence.

I just don't get it. Trump is squeaky clean compared to her. Trump has a hundred times as much experience and charisma. Trump has to be a genius or at least close to being one. Trump has proven leadership skills and an actual resume of success.

It's absolutely unbelievable to think she could still win an election.

>point out facts
>JIDF PLS GO

sandersfags won't vote for HRC

He's been politically involved since the 80's, fuck off

>yfw he never hits rock bottom
>yfw clinton comes away with 100% of the vote

And Romney winning in 2012

daily reminder that this poll asked a whopping
>836 registered voters

>(((WASHINGTON POST)))
Meanwhile in reality....

thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/trump-trumps-wins-historic-race-record-fashion
>On Tuesday Donald Trump closed the door on the Republican nomination for President

Trump has 1,536 delegates and counting.

T>he Republican Party started the year with 17 bona fide candidates for President. This was more candidates than any major party in history. 6-7 wins

>Trump has more wins than any other Republican or Democrat candidate in this year’s race with 36. He also has more primary wins with 33 and leads all candidates in percent of overall wins and in percent of primary wins.

>This may be more delegates than any other Republican candidate and a higher percentage of delegates than any Republican or Democrat candidate in the race.

>Trump received 13,406,108 votes to date in the elections according to www.thegreenpapers.com.

As a result Trump has more votes than any candidate in Republican history.

>Trump shattered the previous record by 1.4 million votes — and that was with 17 candidates in the race

George W. Bush had 12 million votes in 2000. The Republican Party also set a party record this year in pre-convention state election turnout with over 28 million votes to date which is 139% of the record high voter turnout in 2008. This increase in votes can be attributed to Donald Trump.

>Trump won a higher percentage of votes than any candidate ever when considering the number of contenders in the race. He also has the highest percent of delegates when considering the competition than any candidate ever.

Trump may also be the first candidate in the modern era to have funded his campaign by himself during the primary season.

Although his results are much more impressive, he only spent a quarter the amount of money as Democrats Clinton and Sanders. He proved to be the real capitalist in the primary while Clinton and Sanders proved to be the socialists freely spending other people’s money.

If you dig a little deeper you find this "poll" to be a farce.

This is what happens when you get all your news from Sup Forums.

There are more registered Democrats than Republicans in America, that's to be expected. The big red flag is that independents don't have a plurality

>2 posts by this id

Someone I work with was talking about her experience (doing what exactly other than being a corrupt cunt I don't know) and how her husband was the greatest thing ever.

>Want to determine what percentage of the American population drinks alcohol
>Obviously can't ask every single American so have to take a sample
>Go to local bar
>There are about 10 people in there, not including the bartender
>Decide that every customer in there will be my sample
>Ask all of them whether or not they drink alcohol
>Out of all the answers I received, 90% of them were "yes"
>The guy who said "no" seemed to be heavily intoxicated, and that could have affected the honesty of his answer, so I have to discard that one to not risk corrupting the data
>Post the results of my poll online, stating that I have proof that 100% of American citizens drink alcohol
>Decide not to state my sample size, how I conducted the poll, or where I gathered my sample from because no one will care enough to check those details
>??????
>Profit

>Obama announces that all investigations in Hillary will be stopped as they have determined she is innocent
>Clinton wins the presidency by a landslide
>she appoints Obama as the vp
>Trump is found dead in his office
>cause of death is suicide by gunshot to the back of the head
>more Clinton aides mysteriously die in accidents
>she gets elected for a second term

>800 people polled
>probably 60% of them registered democrats

wew lads, lugenpresse is at is again

>the only trump based news since the last poll was that he was right about Brexit (something most americans don't care about)
>his poll numbers go down

sure seems reasonable hahahaha

Clinton is smart to hide out though, its how she beat Sanders

No new* controversy. Old controversies do nothing to swing a vote because people have already made up their minds on him or have gotten used to them.

jihadwatch.org/2016/06/idaho-muslim-migrant-sex-assault-case-obama-appointed-prosecutor-threatens-community

Yes he is a Clinton plant, just like perot.
Ridiculously obvious

>Undersample independents
>Oversample dems even more than their national registration despite their drastically lowered turnout
>Nothing but bad news for shillary over the past week
>HER NUMBERS KEEP GROWING GUYS! TRUMP IS FINISHED! TRUMP BETTER GET OUT OF THE RACE NOW! THE GOP BETTER PUSH HIM OUT.

My bet: It's a tie or a slight Trump lead in reality.

Despite her attempt to bury her last name, a great many people still associate the Clinton name with 90s and his relatively successful presidency. Meanwhile the Trump name and brand has come to be associated with racism and race baiting.

>washington post
The same people who hate Trump are putting out skewed polls.
In any other poll her lead is no more than 5.

THey said the same thing last week about brexit after they killed that woman

The population of the U.S. is 836, don't cha'know

I don't take polls seriously from pollsters who don't even know all the candidates on the ballot.
Johnson is on the ballot in all 50 states, and the gap is smaller with him in it.

>washingtonpost

steady on old chap. 5 months to go.

The point is OVERsampling you soft-headed downie. There are more Democrats, but not 50 fucking percent more.

>wapo

>Muh polls!!!!!

Polls showed that Brexit would lose and how did that turn out?

heatst.com/uk/exclusive-brexit-2nd-referendum-petition-a-4-chan-prank-bbc-report-it-as-real/

Sup Forums plays 4d chess brah
How will polls ever recover?
How will normies ever trust polls again?

Its actually neck and neck in the battleground states, where the election matters.

Live in shitcago voted in primary for trump but not gonna bother voting in general for trump. illinois will never turn red my vote is literally meaningless

HOW CAN TRUMP RECOVER????

>Washington post
OUT OUT OUT OUT

Did someone mention polls?

if you've ever taken a college level statistics course then you should know polls are basically bullshit and can be designed to say whatever you want it to say.

Trump will win, meme magic has already predicted it.

>washington post

Can you not?

media and elites are desperate to push a narrative that Trump is losing popularity. The opposite is true, his support has never been stronger. Even berniefags are supporting trump instead of hitlary.

>ancient history is still relevant

R E A C H I N G

you faggots don't get it

there has been nothing out of the ordinary happening and the polls are acting like Trump just threw a bucket of puppies into a river

it's a giant load of bullshit

archive.is/FhvRb

don't trust the polls right now senpai, it's political theater, wait until the debates between our man Trump and the criminal, that's when the contrast will be made and the polls will start reflecting what people want.

Political polls are political tools like all others, it's what the left always uses to legitimize their side without forming a logical argument. The idea is that if you tell people that everyone is going to vote for Hillary then people will vote for Hillary.

It's unclear if it works at all. It could work the other way around.

Just look at Brexit. It's not unlikely that many leave voters decided to vote just because they thought it was a chance they would loose.