Stefcuck Molymeme crying over dead mudslimes
youtube.com
>inb4 not an argument
STEFAN MOLYMEME CRYING OVER MUDSLIME BABIES
Other urls found in this thread:
bittube.co
youtube.com
twitter.com
Bedecke deinen Himmel, Zeus, mit Wolkendunst
Now that I think about it, if Muslims are angry because we are bombing their countries, then why on hell do they support the left?
Come home Stefan. Come home....
>then why on hell do they support the left
Funny thing is that they will most likely vote for Clinton in the US (i.e. the biggest war criminal that has ever lived).
Fuck off Malachi, Muslims are the true Aryans.
who cares about this jew fag
fuck off
No wonder he never made a buck as an actor.
And what's the deal with the roleplaying at the end?
Shoo roach
Shut the fuck up. Its the US's fault for destabilizing the middle east cos muh democracy and now we're getting flooded with muslims as a result.
Not a point
around 45:00
Killing woman and children is abhorrent. No Valhalla for pussy's I'm afraid.
>Not realizing that stefan is becoming more natsoc
Hes soon going to talk about Zionism, then satanic jews, and then the holohoax, and then hitler
Yeah I don't get his views on this at all.
He basically thinks that western wars in the middle east stirred up the hornet's nest because they have lower IQs and basically can't handle democracy. But the thing is, it was a shithole before we started bombing them.
>Iran
>shithole
>Its the US's fault for destabilizing the middle east cos muh democracy
You sound fairly new to the arena of politically incorrect information that nobody wants you to see so I'll just get the ball rolling for you a bit more; read up on a document called the "Project for the New American Century" and look into shit like Operation Northwoods.
Realize that the US government/establishment is in a full blown economic empire mode, invading one country after another so they can use the world bank to effectively enslave and manipulate these countries through debt.
The invasion of Iraq wasn't a mistake so to speak and neither was the result, it was a successful attempt to destabilize the region so that a malleable puppet may replace them years down the line. The US has been doing this for about a century now less and less shamelessly, just funding any group of fanatic maniacs who just so happen to have interests that line up with the long term strategic goals of the US, which is to secure complete and utter domination over the entire world economically and militarily.
I harbor no ill will towards the American people but their government has become an imperialist regime over the years and if Hillary gets in I'm sure she will perfect this art of aggressive economic subjugation of foreign countries.
>more and more shamelessly*
Fix'd
wew
we do ALL of that to maintain our status as a superpower
brits did the same
romans did the same
nazis did the same
americans just allow people in foreign countries the illusion that they are ruling themselves by promoting and installing puppet governments, not being invaded and conquered
that's the difference
some of it is necessary, some of it, probably not so much
>muh imperialism
>muh America is evil
Lel, fuck off Molyjew, Muslims suck cock, if they don't want to get bombed they shouldn't be terrorists, it's that fucking simple, fuck 'em.
Obviously Obama is shit, and his foreign policy is shit, but Dubya was justified.
Proof needed of his JOO bloodline.
Not an argument :^)
Sorry I just don't think globalism is a good idea no matter how apparent it is on a map and no matter how noble and civil the aggressor nation in question is. I don't care for your puppet leaders; it's still globalism to force the whole world to bend to the will of a single state.
>republicans: invaded and killed over a million Iraqis
>democrats: do two precision airstrikes a day that usually kill no civilians
Not an meme
>king of manlets
Feels good
I agree to an extent, but it's better than allowing Iran to become dominant in the middle east while russia tries to expand west
that basically means the US, and our allies (including you) are fucked and it's another cold war
I don't like globalism either, but this new american century scheme is too far along to stop now, especially with our currency essentially dependent on the petrodollar
daily reminder he is a filthy kike. spread the word!
youtube.com
44:00
wow he is not far from breakdown
This is nothing new. He was always a non-interventionist. His supposed transition into a nationalist was just wishful thinking & memery. Molyjew was, is, and always will be an ancap.
he starts actually crying at 46:00
>I agree to an extent, but it's better than allowing Iran to become dominant in the middle east
I strongly disagree, Iran gaining hegemony over the region probably wouldn't affect me in the slightest, literally not my problem and it's not yours either, you shouldn't care.
Meanwhile the US gaining hegemony over the entire fucking planet obviously will affect me, literally wherever I go.
I hate this "a one world government is okay if it's western" sentiment, it's just shamelessly hypocritical.
i agree.
germany is one of those.
they legally have power over germany until 2099
Thanks Obama!
I'm not gonna cry about it, but I can see how this would be really upsetting to someone, especially if you have kids and imagine what it would be like to see their brains hanging out of their skull.
99% of the time muds hang em by the door just as the drone gets ready to strike.
not that i care. in 15 years they would blow themselves up, so nothing of value is lost.
holy shit that's hard to look at. it's like seeing your dad cry. something must be really wrong when that happens.
he's clearly acting. he was an actor or something along those lines.
guy has some mental problems for sure.
What do they do that for? Trigger people into joining ISIS?
>I strongly disagree, Iran gaining hegemony over the region probably wouldn't affect me in the slightest, literally not my problem and it's not yours either, you shouldn't care.
oil prices (among other things) would skyrocket, and we wouldn't be able to do shit about it unless we started a war with Iran, which, would trigger a Russian response
The only reason the United States made that nuclear deal is to balance Middle Eastern powers so that we can get out and be prepared to respond effectively should Russia invade Ukraine
If Russia can successfully invade Ukraine, she can deploy anti-icbm defense systems to protect Moscow from non-direct western intervention (aka nukes) and feel more confident invading further west into Europe
Human shields is the strategy. Don't know if the pic
>pure Roman blood
posted is legit though.
JUST
same thing as this. 1 million hajis are let in because of beach boy.
sad violins in the background.
"goy...have you no soul? open the gates"
more beach boy media time.
basically appealing to emotion (among women for the most part)
get the media to bitch and cry about them.
make the opponent seem some psycho that machine guns you for no reason.
play the victim card. expect free shit in return.
...
Strapping a body against concrete for shielding purposes? Well, I guess I wouldn't be shocked if they were actually that stupid.
You're not getting it mate, I don't agree with globalism full stop, I wont hear the excuses.
politics have nothing to do on how advanced the weapons are, put the democrats on the Iraq war and you have the same bloodbath
Airstrikes almost always kill at least some civvies according to military documentation of the operations. But not nearly as much as full on occupations.
When the time comes to destroy the enemy it takes strength of character to follow through. We must turn our backs on the weak crybabies and Jews that try to make us feel bad about destroying the enemy of the glorious white race.
I don't agree with it either, to a certain extent. But it is, in probably 50% of all cases, necessary for your safety and (generally speaking) prosperity.
Well it is now yeah since you demanded we dismantle the empire after world war 2. It's a bit like saying "Be thankful we didn't nuke you into giving up the empire like we did with Japan"
No, fuck you.
Even if you hated Saddam you have to admit that he was a stabilizing power in the Middle East. Deposing him caused a power vacuum that resulted in ISIS and the massacres and movement of populations.
US foreign policy is an integral part of the rapefugee crisis.
In what way has Iran become dominant, aren't they fighting ISIS? Iraq and Afghanistan are irrelevant shitholes anyways, Syria and Iran are the big players, the kikes will live for the future. Best case scenario, they band together and kill the Saudis, which is great for all mankind. Not sure if Schlomo pushing for another war for oil.
>a fucking hospital
pretty true tho
This took a bit of effort. Still not an argument
Iran hasn't become dominant
we've propped them up along with Turkey, Israel (bigtime), and Saudi Arabia so that while they are all at odds with each other (currently and historically), they must work together to prosper
I can't think of a good analogy to pair this with, but do you get my point at least?
Don't get feisty with me, dad, remember where you stand in the world.
And that's not in any way because of the US. You dismantled your empire because you risked the destruction of your industry and ultimately wealth during WWII when you declared war on Hitler.
I'm sorry, but Churchill bit off a little more than he could chew but you're lucky him and FDR were bff otherwise FDR wouldn't have embargoed oil shipments to Japan to bait them into attacking and to get us involved in WWII.
Remember how we sent you arms whilst officially neutral in both world wars?
I guess if we stayed full isolationist we wouldn't have ever sent you any arms.
Iran isn't Sunni, they aren't on the same level of shit as Saudi Arabia. They will literally never work with the Saudis or the kikes, very unlikely. You were able to install a puppet state, not really tough to control.
Not really getting your point about why we must war them, I don't think they'll form alliances with the Saudi fags, and the kikes are on your side already.
>And that's not in any way because of the US. You dismantled your empire because you risked the destruction of your industry and ultimately wealth
Quoted from Elliott Roosevelt's As he Saw It, Meredith Press, NY (1947) by L. Wolfe
>"The British Empire trade agreements,'' he [Churchill] began heavily, `are--'|'' ``Father broke in. "Yes. Those Empire trade agreements are a case in point. It is because of them that the people of India and Africa, of all the colonial Near East and Far East, are still as backward as they are.'
>Churchill's neck reddened and he crouched forward. `Mr. President, England does not propose for a moment to lose its favored position among the British Dominions. The trade that has made England great shall continue, and under these conditions prescribed by England's ministers.'
>Roosevelt "I am firmly of the belief that if we are to arrive at a stable peace, it must involve the development of backward countries. Backward peoples. How can this be done? It can't be done obviously by eighteenth-century methods."
>Churchill: "There can be no tampering with the Empire's economic agreements."
>Roosevelt: "They're artificial...."
>Churchill: "They are the foundation of our greatness."
>Roosevelt: "The peace,' said Father firmly, `cannot include any continued despotism. The structure of the peace demands and will get equality of peoples..."
You demanded we give it up just after becoming the world's first nuclear superpower. The US is solely responsible for the dismantling of our empire and therefore the artificial necessity for us to be a part of NATO.
When he started to cry I stopped watching. Embarrassing.
Fuck off, psychopath.
>breakdown
at the garage, Stefo handled every breakdown with aplomb
Stefan trying to use intellectual arguments with his dum audience. You have to know your target audience amateur cuck.
AAHAHHAHA...
kek okay you sound like a nigger right now
>it's your fault that we're oppressed!!1
>I don't think they'll form alliances with the Saudi fags
Under normal circumstances they wouldn't, but when you pit 4 regional powers with 4 completely different ethnic backgrounds, in order to survive they must make deals with each other.
Think of it as college. If a smelly Indian or shitskin (from my experience) understands content from one of your classes, but one of the white kids is obviously a liberal who is obsessed with vidya and is loud af in class with his friends, who would you rather work with?
That's the best I can come up with atm
Is he doing a performance piece?
What do you guys think of based Bill Whittle?
Is he redpilled?
I dont't even understand what that means.
You don't understand. They're using them as human shields by trying to prevent strikes from happening. They're hoping that the superior powers will decide not to bomb them so as to avoid hitting the kids. This is the same reason that Hamas launches missiles from within civilian areas rather than from isolated fields.
I can't possibly sound like a nigger because I just disproved you with facts using sound reason and logic. The so called special relationship between our nations is nothing more than the relationship between vassal and ruler. You turned on us right after world war 2, not nice mate.
The US didn't kill anywhere near that many Iraqis. The vast majority of casualties from the war were mudslimes killing each other.
Seriously? Everyone know Stefan "Sand-nigger grave digger" Molyneux is as hard line as any of us Sup Forumsacks when it comes to mudslimes... His criticism is basically that these fucking inbred mud people arent worth the bullets their shot with or a dime of tax payer money and that if the US is fully committed to genocide of the sand people there are far more cost efficient means. Stop defaming the one man Klan on his home ground.
Molyneux is too retarded even for Sup Forums
>sound reason and logic
You complain that it's our fault that you bit off more than you could chew in WWII?
England was dead at that point in terms of being a global superpower. We propped you up so you could still be a European superpower, which you still are.
>I feel like I got a predator species on the planet
>they could literally get us all killed
>I don't know what they think they're doing
>I don't know what the goal is
>there is this weird inability to just say "ok we're going home"
It's painful to see how close he is... If only he could embrace the truth.
What part of the quotes from the discussion between FDR and Churchill didn't you understand? Churchill was happy to continue maintaining the empire, yet the US president quite clearly set out post-war stipulations in treaties which would effectively kill the empire and he did this knowingly. Britain by and large did quite well for ourselves in world war 2 and after all that fighting the US turns around and makes it all for naught, just so we would become their vassal instead of Germany's.
Sly as fuck.
> after all that fighting the US turns around and makes it all for naught
You were a fucking wrecked country and we paid big bucks to rebuild you!
That said, there cannot be two global superpowers on the same side.
Especially when one owns the seas.
>it's good to bomb Muslim countries, make them hate us, and cause terrorism
Edgy as fuck dude B)
Also
>England was dead at that point in terms of being a global superpower
Sure we weren't at max strength but it was hardly fucking worthless. Pic related, British empire in 1945, it's WW1 that made us give up the most of the empire then FDR wanted to finish us off after WW2 I guess.
Thanks.
I just said that your manufacturing was destroyed because you picked a fight with the Germans.
You ever wonder why London City is the banking center of the world?
Why do you keep pretending FDR didn't officially order the dismantling of our empire? Just get over it dude I don't hold it against you personally but just know this; the US betrayed the UK after WW2.
FDR was a cripplecuck (literally) and I find it hard to believe that he was able to convince Churchill to surrender the empire.
Churchill must've been a pussy.
They've always hated us you idiot
Well just after watching two Japanese cities get fucking wiped off the face of the earth I don't think anyone was really in a position to argue if they didn't want to same treatment. FDR also romanticized the idea of taking down the British as an American.
Maybe, but they weren't suicide bombing us until we put thousands of soldiers over there.
WW1 killed the British empire. It may have ended in WW2 (Suez), but it basically died and was left limping after ww1.
You are disgusting my flag, Reynders.
It wasn't completely dead though, we still had quite a bit of land left and controlled a population of about 450 million. You can't convince me that would have ever been worth giving up if it wasn't for the new pressure from the US enjoying its status as the new world nuclear superpower.
Who is this guy and why does Sup Forums follow his dumb ass so closely?
He is every one of us just before we became Sup Forums.
>FDR
>atomic bombs
My bad, FDR started with these demands towards the end of the war and then Truman went through with them.
kek do some research before you try and start shit with america, kiddo
Have a nice day
1.08.55 It's been a succes She's qutie happy with how things are working out
I have higher expections.
>that pic
Stefan is fucking jewish
He's pretty fucking cucked in this video. Worst one in a while. Imagine what the middle east would do if they had the power of America. They would have literally genocided the entire planet.
Was hat der Dichter damit gemeint?
I've clearly done far more research into the subject than you have since you seem completely unaware that there was any anti-british sentiment in American politics towards the end of WW2.
when the fuck does he start crying?
omg i'm just manlet, my brain must be affected
he got paid off. not the first internet personality to be bought and probably not the last. but this hasnt helped liberals 1 bit. they have been doing this for years and it actually works against them